Skip to main content
Log in

Is it reasonable to use a lower DOAC dose in some patients with VTE? NO

  • DEBATE
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The international guidelines recommend the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists for anticoagulation long-term therapy in patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism (VTE), and for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Efficacy and safety of DOACS have been extensively evaluated in large phase III trials. According to the product label, dose reductions of DOACs are recommended for patients with AF and renal impairment, low body weight and concomitant use of interfering medications. Except for Edoxaban, dose reductions of DOACs are not recommended in patients with VTE based on the same indications for AF patients. The aim of this article is to discuss the indication of a lower DOAC dose in some patients with VTE. Observational studies and randomized control trials (RCTs) show that patients with AF are usually older, more often have chronic diseases, and more often are treated with several concomitant medications, potentially increasing their haemorrhagic risk. Furthermore, many VTE patients need a shorter period of anticoagulation therapy than AF patients. In real-life studies, VTE patients treated with inappropriate DOAC doses present a higher rate of VTE recurrence, and the same risk of bleeding compared to those treated with the correct dose. In light of this evidence, the use of lower DOAC dose in patients with VTE does not appear reasonable and may be potentially dangerous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J et al (2016) Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease. Chest guideline and expert panel report. Chest 149:315–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Es N, Coppens M, Schulman S et al (2014) Direct oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin K antagonists for acute venous thromboembolism: evidence from phase 3 trials. Blood 124(12):1968–1975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D et al (2016) 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Europace. 18(11):1609–1678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prisco D, Ageno W, Becattini C et al (2017) Italian intersociety consensus on DOAC use in internal medicine. Intern Emerg Med 12(3):387–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tran E, Duckett A, Fisher S et al (2017) Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing for venous thromboembolism treatment. J Thromb Thrombolysis

  6. Tellor KB, Patel S, Armbruster AL et al (2015) Evaluation of the appropriateness of dosing, indication and safety of rivaroxaban in a community hospital. J Clin Pharm Ther 40(4):447–451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Pasquale G, Mathieu G, Maggioni AP et al (2013) Current presentation and management of 7148 patients with atrial fibrillation in cardiology and internal medicine hospital centers: the ATA AF study. Int J Cardiol 167(6):2895–2903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kakkar AK, Mueller I, Bassand JP et al (2013) Risk profiles and antithrombotic treatment of patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: perspectives from the international, observational, prospective GARFIELD registry. PLoS ONE 8(5):e63479

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dentali F, Di Micco G, Giorgi Pierfranceschi M et al (2015) Rate and duration of hospitalization for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in real-world clinical practice. Ann Med 47(7):546–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Verdecchia P, Angeli F, Bartolini C et al (2015) Safety and efficacy of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a Bayesian meta-analysis approach. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 14(1):7–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kline JA, Jimenez D, Courtney DM et al (2016) Comparison of four bleeding risk scores to identify Rivaroxaban-treated patients with venous thromboembolism at low risk for major bleeding. Acad Emerg Med 23(2):144–150

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schulman S, Kakkar AK, Goldhaber SZ et al (2014) RE-COVER II Trial Investigators. Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism with dabigatran or warfarin and pooled analysis. Circulation 129(7):764–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davidson BL, Verheijen S, Lensing AW et al (2014) Bleeding risk of patients with acute venous thromboembolism taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin. JAMA Intern Med 174(6):947–953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ageno W, Samperiz A, Caballero R et al (2015) Duration of anticoagulation after venous thromboembolism in real world clinical practice. Thromb Res 135(4):666–672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Blanco-Molina A, Enea I, Gadelha T et al (2014) Sex differences in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism. Medicine (Baltimore) 93(17):309–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Trujillo-Santos J, Di Micco P, Dentali F et al (2017) Real-life treatment of venous thromboembolism with direct oral anticoagulants: the influence of recommended dosing and regimens. Thromb Haemost 117(2):382–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr Francesco Dentali has acted as paid lecturer or board member and received grants and honoraria from Bayer, Sanofi, BMS/Pfizer, Boheringer, Alfa Wasserman and IL in the last 36 months for researches unrelated to the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Dentali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dentali, F., Fantoni, C. Is it reasonable to use a lower DOAC dose in some patients with VTE? NO. Intern Emerg Med 12, 565–567 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-017-1695-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-017-1695-8

Keywords

Navigation