Skip to main content
Log in

Management of patients presenting with haemoptysis to a Tertiary Care Italian Emergency Department: the Florence Haemoptysis Score (FLHASc)

  • EM - ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analysed the clinical features and diagnostic workup of patients presenting with haemoptysis to an Italian teaching hospital to derive an easy-to-use clinical score to guide risk stratification and initial management in the emergency department (ED). We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of consecutive patients with haemoptysis over 1 year. A pre-specified set of variables, including demographic data, vital signs, type of expectorate (pure blood vs. blood-streaked sputum), comorbidities, and diagnostic tests and treatments was originally registered. The primary outcome was a composite of any of the following: death from any cause, invasive or non-invasive ventilation, Intensive Care Unit admission, blood transfusions or invasive haemostatic procedures. We investigated associations between the pre-specified clinical variables and the primary outcome using a logistic regression analysis. Finally, we derived a score (the Florence Haemoptysis Score, FLHASc) giving a proportional weight to each variable according to the Odds Ratios (OR). We included 197 patients with a median age of 60 years. The first radiological study was a plain chest X-ray in 128 patients (65%). For 33 (17%) patients, a chest computer tomography (CT scan) was the first radiological study. The most common diagnosis was lung malignancy (19% of cases). The diagnosis remained undetermined in one-third of patients. The primary outcome was met by 11.2% of the study population. Systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg (OR 9.7), a history of malignancy (OR 3), the expectoration of pure blood (OR 2.8), and more than 2 episodes of haemoptysis in the prior 24 h (OR 2.5) are found as independent predictors of the primary outcome. The FLHASc ranges from 0 to 6 with a prognostic accuracy of 78% (IC 95%, 68–88%). The primary outcome incidence is 2.4% (IC 95%, 0.2–8.2%) in patients with a FLHASc equal to zero (n = 85, 43%) versus 13.4% (IC 95% 7.8–21.1%) in patients with a FLHASc > 0 (p < 0.01). Among patients with a FLHASc equal to zero, a negative chest X-ray study identifies patients who may be safely discharged. Patients who presented to the ED with haemoptysis experience a heterogeneous management. We derive a simple clinical prognostic score that may rationalize their diagnostic workup.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sakr L, Dutau H (2010) Massive hemoptysis: an update on the role of bronchoscopy in diagnosis and management. Respiration 80(1):38–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jean-Baptiste E (2005) Management of haemoptysis in emergency department. Hospital Physician, pp 53–59

  3. Milani GF, Pivirotto F., Leporini C (2013) Emottisi: il ruolo della broncoscopia nella diagnosi e terapia. Standard operativi e linee guida in endoscopia toracica. 2° Consensus Conference Nazionale. Bologna (16 April 2013)

  4. Larici AR, Franchi P, Occhipinti M, Contegiacomo A, del Ciello A, Calandriello L et al (2014) Diagnosis and management of hemoptysis. Diagn Interv Radiol 20(4):299–309

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jean-Baptiste E (2000) Clinical assessment and management of massive hemoptysis. Crit Care Med 28(5):1642–1647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thirumaran M, Sundar R, Sutcliffe IM, Currie DC (2009) Is investigation of patients with haemoptysis and normal chest radiograph justified? Thorax 64(10):854–856

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fartoukh M (2010) Severe haemoptysis: indications for triage and admission to hospital or intensive care unit. Rev Mal Respir 27(10):1243–1253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ketai LH, Mohammed TL, Kirsch J, Kanne JP, Chung JH, Donnelly EF et al (2014) ACR appropriateness criteria(R) hemoptysis. J Thorac Imaging 29(3):W19–W22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ibrahim WH (2008) Massive haemoptysis: the definition should be revised. Eur Respir J 32(4):1131–1132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rugarli C (2015) Medicina interna sistematica. Edizione 7. 2015

  11. Ministero della Salute (2016) Ministero della Salute—Assistenza, ospedale e territorio—118 e Pronto Soccorso—I codici colore gravità (triage)

  12. Fabbian Fabio, Melandri Roberto, Borsetti Gabriella, Micaglio Emanuele, Pala Marco, De Giorgi Alfredo, Menegatti Alessandra Mellozzi, Boccafogli Arrigo, Manfredini Roberto (2012) Color-coding triage and allergic reactions in an Italian ED. Am J Emerg Med 30(5):826–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lipley N (2005) Updated Manchester triage system published this month. Emerg Nurse 13(7):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dweik RA, Stoller JK (1999) Role of bronchoscopy in massive hemoptysis. Clin Chest Med 20(1):89–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Flume PA, Yankaskas JR, Ebeling M, Hulsey T, Clark LL (2005) Massive hemoptysis in cystic fibrosis. Chest 128(2):729–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ong TH, Eng P (2003) Massive hemoptysis requiring intensive care. Intensive Care Med 29(2):317–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Khalil A, Soussan M, Mangiapan G, Fartoukh M, Parrot A, Carette MF (2007) Utility of high-resolution chest CT scan in the emergency management of haemoptysis in the intensive care unit: severity, localization and aetiology. Br J Radiol 80(949):21–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garzon AA, Cerruti MM, Golding ME (1982) Exsanguinating hemoptysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 84(6):829–833

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Valipour A, Kreuzer A, Koller H, Koessler W, Burghuber OC (2005) Bronchoscopy-guided topical hemostatic tamponade therapy for the management of life-threatening hemoptysis. Chest 127(6):2113–2118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holsclaw DS, Grand RJ, Shwachman H (1970) Massive hemoptysis in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr 76(6):829–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bobrowitz ID, Ramakrishna S, Shim YS (1983) Comparison of medical v surgical treatment of major hemoptysis. Arch Intern Med 143(7):1343–1346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vanni S, Jimenez D, Nazerian P, Morello F, Parisi M, Daghini E et al (2015) Short-term clinical outcome of normotensive patients with acute PE and high plasma lactate. Thorax 70(4):333–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Adriell RS, Jaqueline LS, Fábio FA (2013) SaO2/FiO2 ratio as risk stratification for patients with sepsis. Crit Care 17(suppl 14):51

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson AB, Teschler H, Rennard SI (1992) Pathogenesis, evaluation, and therapy for massive hemoptysis. Clin Chest Med 13(1):69–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bidwell JL, Pachner RW (2005) Hemoptysis: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Phys 72(7):1253–1260

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fartoukh M, Khoshnood B, Parrot A, Khalil A, Carette MF, Stoclin A et al (2012) Early prediction of in-hospital mortality of patients with hemoptysis: an approach to defining severe hemoptysis. Respiration 83(2):106–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Sarah McLean in correcting the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Vanni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vanni, S., Bianchi, S., Bigiarini, S. et al. Management of patients presenting with haemoptysis to a Tertiary Care Italian Emergency Department: the Florence Haemoptysis Score (FLHASc). Intern Emerg Med 13, 397–404 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-017-1618-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-017-1618-8

Keywords

Navigation