Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Italian Society of Internal Medicine choosing wisely campaign

  • CE - ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Appropriateness is one of the critical aspects of medicine. For this reason, the Italian Society of Internal Medicine (SIMI) decided to adhere to the Choosing Wisely Campaign. A bottom-up approach was chosen. All the recommendations published in the US and Canadian Choosing Wisely campaign have been screened, and an e-mail was sent to all the SIMI members for new suggestions. The thirty interventions that were judged as the highest priority by a committee were sent to all the SIMI members for voting. The first procedures selected were then revised, and constituted the five points of the SIMI choosing wisely campaign. The identified procedures were: (1) avoid prescribing bed rest unless an acceptable indication exists. Promote early mobilization; (2) Do not perform a D-dimer test without a precise indication; (3) Do not prescribe long term intravenous antibiotic therapy in the absence of symptoms; (4) Do not indefinitely prescribe proton pump inhibitors in the absence of specific indications; (5) Do not place, or leave in place, peripherally inserted central catheters for patient’s or provider’s convenience. Four of these points were not present in any other campaign, while one, the fifth, was already present. The bottom-up approach of the SIMI “Choosing Wisely” campaign favored the identification of different priorities compared to other campaigns. Future studies should now evaluate if the application of these “not-to-do” recommendations will be associated with an improvement of clinical outcome and a subsequent direct and indirect health care cost reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. http://www.bmj.com/too-much-medicine

  2. Choosing wisely: an initiative of the ABIM Foundation. 2013 (http://www.choosingwisely.org/). Accessed 1 July 2016

  3. Morden ME, Colla CH, Sequist TD, Rosenthal MB (2014) Choosing wisely—the politics and economics of labeling low-value services. NEJM. 370:589–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Future Hospital Commission (2013) The future hospital: caring for the medical patient. Royal College of Physicians, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gaspoz JM (2015) Smarter medicine: do physicians need political pressure to eliminate useless interventions? Swiss Med Wkly. 26(145):w14125

    Google Scholar 

  6. www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists

  7. www.choosingwiselycanada.org

  8. Brown CJ, Friedkin RJ, Inouye SK (2004) Prevalence and outcomes of low mobility in hospitalized older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:1263–1270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Convertino VA, Doerr DF, Eckberg DL, Fritsch JM, Verikos-Danellis J (1990) Bedrest impairs human baroreflex responses and provokes orthostatic hypotension. J Appl Physiol 8:1458–1464

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gaffney FA, Nixon JV, Karlsson ES, Campbell W, Dowdey ABC, Blomqvist CG (1985) Cardiovascular deconditioning produced by 20 hours of bed rest with head-down tilt (-5) in middle-aged healthy men. Am J Cardiol 56:634–638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Covinsky K, Pierluissi E, Johnson BE (2011) Hospitalization-associated disability. JAMA 306:1782–1793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Krumholz HM (2013) Post-hospital syndrome—an acquired, transient condition of generalized risk. NEJM. 368:100–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalisch BJ, Lee S, Dabney BW (2013) Outcomes of inpatient mobilization: a literature review. J Clin Nurs 23:1486–1501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Herkner H, Arrich J, Havel C, Müllner M (2007) Bed rest for acute uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 2. Art. No: CD003836

  15. Aissaoui N, Martins E, Mouly S, Weber S, Meune C (2009) A meta-analysis of bed rest versus early ambulation in the management of pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, or both. Int J Card. 137:37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hunter A, Johnson L, Coustasse A (2014) Reduction of intensive care unit length of stay: the case of early mobilization. Health Care Manag. 33:128–135

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lynch E, Hillier S, Cadilhac D (2014) When should physical rehabilitation commence after stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 9:468–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Allen C, Glasziou P, Del Mar C (1999) Bed rest: a potentially harmful treatment needing more careful evaluation. Lancet 354:1229–1233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Konstantinides S, Torbicki A, Agnelli G et al (2014) 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 35:3033–3069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fridkin S, Baggs J, Fagan R et al (2014) Vital signs: improving antibiotic use among hospitalized patients. MMWR. 63:9

    Google Scholar 

  21. Magill SS, Edwards JR, Beldavs ZG et al (2014) Prevalence of antimicrobial use in US acute care hospitals, May–September 2011. JAMA 312:1438–1446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A et al (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 39:165–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pugh R, Grant C, Cooke RPD, Dempsey G (2015) Short-course versus prolonged-course antibiotic therapy for hospital acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 8. Art. No: CD007577

  24. El Moussaoui R, de Borgie C, van den Broek P et al (2006) Effectiveness of discontinuing antibiotic treatment after three days versus eight days in mild to moderate-severe community acquired pneumonia: randomised, double blind study. BMJ 332(7554):1355

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Havey TC, Fowler RA, Daneman N (2011) Duration of antibiotic therapy for bacteremia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 15:R267

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Grube RR, May DB (2007) Stress ulcer prophylaxis in hospitalized patients not in intensive care units. Am J Health Syst Pharm 64:1396–1400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Heidelbaugh JJ, Goldberg KL, Inadomi JM (2009) Overutilization of proton pump inhibitors: a review of cost-effectiveness and risk. Am J Gastroenterol 104:S27–S32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Issa IA, Soubra O, Nakkash H, Soubra L (2012) Variables associated with stress ulcer prophylaxis misuse: a retrospective analysis. Dig Dis Sci 57:2633–2641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Koczka CP, Geraldino-Pardilla L, Goodman AJ (2013) Physicians’ opinions of stress ulcer prophylaxis: survey results from a large urban medical center. Dig Dis Sci 58:777–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou B, Huang Y, Li H, Sun W, Liu J (2016) Proton-pump inhibitors and risk of fractures: an update meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 27:339–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Song H, Zhu J, Lu D (2014) Long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and the development of gastric pre-malignant lesions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 12. Art. No: CD010623

  32. Lambert AA, Lam JO, Paik JJ, Ugarte-Gil C, Drummond B, Crowell TA (2015) Risk of community-acquired pneumonia with outpatient proton-pump inhibitor therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 10:e0128004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu T, Tang Y, Jiang L, Zheng Y, Xiong W, Lin L (2016) Proton pump inhibitor therapy and its association with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 48:353–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Heidelbaugh JJ, IInadomi JM (2006) Magnitude and economic impact of inappropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-ICU hospitalized patients. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2200–2205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chopra V, Anand S, Krein SL, Chenoweth C, Saint S (2012) Bloodstream infection, venous thrombosis, and peripherally inserted central catheters: reappraising the evidence. Am J Med 125:733–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chopra V, Anand S, Hickner A, Buist M, Rogers MA, Saint S, Flanders SA (2013) Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 382:311–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Johansson E, Hammarskjöld F, Lundberg D, Heibert M (2013) Advantages and disadvantages of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) compared to other central venous lines: a systematic review of the literature. Acta Oncol 52:886–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Safdar N, Maki DG (2005) Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with peripherally inserted central venous catheters used in hospitalized patients. Chest 128:489–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chopra V, Flanders SA, Saint S et al (2015) The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): Results From a Multispecialty Panel Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Ann Intern Med 163:S1–S39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Montano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montano, N., Costantino, G., Casazza, G. et al. The Italian Society of Internal Medicine choosing wisely campaign. Intern Emerg Med 11, 1125–1130 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-016-1560-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-016-1560-1

Keywords

Navigation