Skip to main content
Log in

Do medical patients need to receive pharmacologic prophylaxis for the prevention of venous thromboembolism?

  • WARD MEDICINE
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acutely ill medical patients with reduced mobility are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism, which can occur during hospitalization or after discharge. A number of clinical trials and meta-analyses have shown that pharmacologic prophylaxis with anticoagulant drugs in these patients significantly reduces the risk of fatal pulmonary embolism as compared to placebo or no treatment, without significant increase in the risk of major bleeding. Thus, the use of anticoagulant prophylaxis is recommended for all high risk medical patients during hospitalization. To identify these high risk patients, clinicians may use the inclusion criteria applied in the trials, with a selection that is mostly qualitative, or risk assessment models, with a selection that is both qualitative and quantitative. With both approaches, about 40 % of medical patients would be at increased risk of venous thrombosis. Because in the real world medical patients tend to be much older and with more comorbidities than in clinical trials, patient selection needs to also take into account risk factors for bleeding. Among others, estimation of creatinine clearance appears to be particularly important to prevent excessive exposure to anticoagulant drugs. Finally, although the risk of venous thrombosis may persist in some patients after hospital discharge, clinical trials assessing extended prophylaxis in this setting have failed to show a convincing clinical benefit with this approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldhaber SZ, Tapson VF (2004) A prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound-confirmed deep vein thrombosis. Am J Cardiol 93:259–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spencer FA, Lessard D, Emery C, Reed G, Goldberg RJ (2007) Venous thromboembolism in the outpatient setting. Arch Intern Med 167:1471–1475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mismetti P, Laporte-Simitsidis S, Tardy B, Cucherat M, Buchmuller A, Juillard-Delsard D, Decousus H (2000) Prevention of venous thromboembolism in internal medicine with unfractionated or low molecular weight heparins: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Thromb Haemost 83:14–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Samama MM, Cohen AT, Darmon JY et al (1999) A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med 341:793–800

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leizorovicz A, Cohen AT, Turpie AGG, Olsson CG, Vaitkus PT, Goldhaber SZ (2004) Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of dalteparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Circulation 110:874–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen AT, Davidson BI, Gallus AS et al (2006) Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for the prevention of VTE in older acute medical patients. BMJ 332:325–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dentali F, Douketis JD, Gianni M, Lim W, Crowther M (2007) Meta-analysis: anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Ann Inter Med 146:278–288

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kahn S, Lim W, Dunn AS et al (2012) Prevention of VTE in non surgical patients. Chest 141(2):Suppl:e195S–e226S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF et al (2008) Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet 371:387–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tapson VF, Decousus H, Pini M et al (2007) Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: findings from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism. Chest 132:936–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gussoni G, Campanini M, Silingardi M, Scannapieco G, Mazzone A, Magni G, Valerio A, Iori I, Ageno W (2009) In hospital symptomatic venous thromboembolism and antithrombotic prophylaxis in Internal Medicine. Findings from a multicenter, prospective study. Thromb Haemost 101:893–901

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ageno W, Squizzato A, Ambrosini F, Dentali F, Marchesi C, Mera V, Steidl L, Venco A (2002) Thrombosis prophylaxis in medical patients: a retrospective review of clinical practice patterns. Haematologica 87:746–750

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF et al (2008) Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based-clinical practice guidelines (8th edition). Chest 133:381–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V et al (2010) A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. J Thromb Haemost 8:2450–2457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lloyd NS, Douketis JD, Moinuddin I, Lim W, Crowther MA (2008) Anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized medical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 6:405–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Decousus H, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF et al (2011) Factors at admission associated with bleeding risk in medical patients. Findings from the IMPROVE Investigators. Chest 139:69–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hull RD, Schellong SM, Tapson VF et al (2010) Extended-duration venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with recently reduced mobility: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 153:8–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen AT, Spiro TE, Büller HR et al (2011) Rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. American College of Cardiology Congress 60th Annual Scientific Session, New Orleans, USA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goldhaber SZ, Leizorovicz A, Kakkar AK et al (2011) Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients. N Engl J Med 365:2167–2177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Ageno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ageno, W. Do medical patients need to receive pharmacologic prophylaxis for the prevention of venous thromboembolism?. Intern Emerg Med 7 (Suppl 3), 189–192 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-012-0800-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-012-0800-2

Keywords

Navigation