Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Controversies in the “pill in the pocket” approach to atrial fibrillation

  • CE - Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Boriani G, Capucci A, Lenzi T, Sanguinetti M, Magnani B (1995) Propafenone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. A controlled comparison between oral loading dose and intravenous administration. Chest 108:355–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boriani G, Biffi M, Capucci A, Botto GL, Broffoni T, Rubino I et al (1997) Oral propafenone to convert recent-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with and without underlying heart disease. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 126(8):621–625

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Azpitarte J, Alvarez M, Baun O, Garcia R, Moreno E, Martin F et al (1997) Value of single oral loading dose of propafenone in converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Eur Heart J 18(10):1649–1654

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Botto GL, Capucci A, Bonini W, Boriani G, Broffoni T, Barone P et al (1997) Conversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm using a single oral loading dose of propafenone: comparison of two regimens. Int J Cardiol 58(1):55–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Capucci A, Lenzi T, Boriani G, Trisolino G, Binetti N, Cavazza M et al (1992) Effectiveness of loading oral flecainide for converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm in patients without organic heart disease or with only systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 70(1):69–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alboni P, Botto GL, Baldi N, Luzi M, Russo V, Gianfranchi L et al (2004) Outpatient treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation with the “pill-in-the-pocket” approach. N Engl J Med 351(23):2384–2391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Capucci A, Villani GQ, Piepoli MF (2003) Reproducible efficacy of loading oral propafenone in restoring sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 92(11):1345–1347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boriani G, Martignani C, Biffi M, Capucci A, Branzi A (2002) Oral loading with propafenone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a review on in-hospital treatment. Drugs 62(3):415–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Capucci A, Villani GQ, Aschieri D, Piepoli M (1999) Safety of oral propafenone in the conversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: a prospective parallel placebo-controlled multicentre study. Int J Cardiol 68(2):187–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crijns HJ (2005) Rate versus rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation: what the trials really say. Drugs 65(12):1651–1667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. de Denus S, Sanoski CA, Carlsson J, Opolski G, Spinler SA (2005) Rate vs. rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 165(3):258–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McNamara RL, Tamariz LJ, Segal JB, Bass EB (2003) Management of atrial fibrillation: review of the evidence for the role of pharmacologic therapy, electrical cardioversion, and echocardiography. Ann Intern Med 139(12):1018–1033

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ray IB, Heist EK (2005) Treating atrial fibrillation. What is the consensus now? Postgrad Med 118(4):47–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Page RL (2004) Clinical practice. Newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 351(23):2408–2416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Falk RH (2005) Is rate control or rhythm control preferable in patients with atrial fibrillation? Rate control is preferable to rhythm control in the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 111(23):3141–3150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zimetbaum P (2005) Is rate control or rhythm control preferable in patients with atrial fibrillation? An argument for maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 111(23):3150–3156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y, Schron EB et al (2002) Atrial fibrillation follow-up investigation of rhythm management (AFFIRM) investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 347(23):1825–1833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA, Kingma JH, Kamp O, Kingma T et al (2002) Rate control versus electrical cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation study group. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 347(23):1834–1840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Lilienthal J (2000) Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation–pharmacological intervention in atrial fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trial. Lancet 356(9244):1789–1794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Carlsson J, Miketic S, Windeler J, Cuneo A, Haun S, Micus S et al (2003) STAF investigators. Randomized trial of rate-control versus rhythm-control in persistent atrial fibrillation the strategies of treatment of atrial fibrillation (STAF) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 41(10):1690–1696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Opolski G, Torbicki A, Kosior DA, Szulc M, Wozakowska-Kaplon B, Kolodziej P et al (2004) Investigators of the Polish how to treat chronic atrial fibrillation study. Rate control vs. rhythm control in patients with nonvalvular persistent atrial fibrillation: the results of the Polish how to treat chronic atrial fibrillation (HOT CAFE) study. Chest 126(2):476–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pronto Soccorso, Ospedale San Paolo, Via Genova, 30, 17100, Savona, Italy

    Alessandro Riccardi & Roberto Lerza

Authors
  1. Alessandro Riccardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roberto Lerza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Riccardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riccardi, A., Lerza, R. Controversies in the “pill in the pocket” approach to atrial fibrillation. Intern Emerg Med 3, 187–189 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-008-0108-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-008-0108-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation