Abstract
Objective
The Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) is a commonly used assessment of cognitive status; however, it has been considered somewhat unwieldy for use in the emergency department (ED). An alternate test, the Quick Confusion Scale (QCS), has been compared against the MMSE in a single centre. We hypothesised that the QCS would strongly correlate with the MMSE in the ED, but could be administered more quickly.
Methods
Trained research assistants administered both the QCS and the MMSE to a convenience sample of 666 patients and visitors in an urban academic ED. Patients were randomised as to which test would be administered first.
Results
The QCS required less time to complete than the MMSE (2.7±1.3 vs. 5.1±1.9 min, p<0.0001). Nine patients could not complete the MMSE because they could not use their hands to write and four because of vision impairment. Correlation of QCS and MMSE scores was fair, with Pearson’s r=0.61 (95% CI, 0.56–0.66).
Conclusions
The QCS can be administered more quickly than the MMSE, and is easier to administer in the ED because it does not require the subject to read, write or draw. There is a fair correlation between QCS and MMSE scores.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-Mental State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psych Res 12:189–198
Huff JS, Farace E, Brady WJ et al (2001) The Quick Confusion Scale in the ED: comparison with the Mini-Mental State Examination. Am J Emerg Med 19:461–464
Irons MJ, Farace E, Brady WJ et al (2002) Mental status screening of emergency department patients: normative study of the quick confusion scale. Acad Emerg Med 9:989–994
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stair, T.O., Morrissey, J., Jaradeh, I. et al. Validation of the Quick Confusion Scale for mental status screening in the emergency department. Int Emergency Med 2, 130–132 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-007-0034-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-007-0034-x