Higher phenotypic plasticity does not confer higher salt resistance to Robinia pseudoacacia than Amorpha fruticosa

  • Xiao Guo
  • Xiao-Huang Ren
  • Franziska Eller
  • Ming-Yan Li
  • Ren-Qing Wang
  • Ning Du
  • Wei-Hua Guo
Original Article
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

A greenhouse experiment was conducted in which two leguminous species commonly used in the Yellow River Delta for vegetation restoration, Robinia pseudoacacia and Amorpha fruticosa, were subjected to five salt treatments: 0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 mmol L−1. We aimed to determine which of the two species would be better suited for growth in a saline environment, and whether the acclimation capacity to salinity resulted from an inherently higher phenotypic plasticity. The results showed that salinity affected most growth and biomass parameters but had no effects on most leaf traits and physiological parameters of the two species. Height, relative growth rate of crown area, root biomass, and leaf mass ratio of R. pseudoacacia were reduced by higher salinity, while A. fruticosa was not affected. Chlorophyll a-to-chlorophyll b ratio and total antioxidative capacity of A. fruticosa increased with higher salinity, whereas those of R. pseudoacacia remained unchanged. Root mass ratio and vitamin C concentration of both species were not affected by salinity, whereas vitamin C concentration of A. fruticosa was higher than that of R. pseudoacacia. The root-to-shoot ratio of A. fruticosa was higher than that of R. pseudoacacia in most salt treatments. Of all leaf traits, only leaf area differed between treatments. R. pseudoacacia generally exhibited a greater plasticity than A. fruticosa in response to salinity, but A. fruticosa was more resistant to the higher salinities than R. pseudoacacia, and was thus a better candidate for vegetation restoration in saline areas.

Keywords

Salt stress Black locust Indigo bush Phenotypic plasticity Morphological, biochemical, and physiological parameters 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by Grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31470402; 31770361; 31500264) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (No. BS2015HZ020). We thank Alex Boon, Ph.D., from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (http://www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript. We express our deep gratitude to Dr. Yifu Yuan and Dr. Zhen Feng for assistance in this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11738_2018_2654_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. Achenbach L, Brix H (2014) Can differences in salinity tolerance explain the distribution of four genetically distinct lineages of Phragmites australis in the Mississippi River Delta? Hydrobiologia 737:5–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1601-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alongi DM (2008) Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 76:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.08.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashraf M (2009) Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers. Biotechnol Adv 27:84–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Björkman O, Demmig B (1987) Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origin. Planta 170:489–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Borsani O, Valpuesta V, Botella M (2001) Evidence for a role of salicylic acid in the oxidative damage generated by NaCl and osmotic stress in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Physiol 126:1024–1030CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Caño L, Fuertes-Mendizabal T, García-Baquero G, Herrera M, González-Moro MB (2016) Plasticity to salinity and transgenerational effects in the nonnative shrub Baccharis halimifolia: insights into an estuarine invasion. Am J Bot 103:808–820CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. IPCC Climate Change (2014) Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C (2009) Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot 103:551–560.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn125 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cierjacks A, Kowarik I, Joshi J, Hempel S, Ristow M, von der Lippe M, Weber E (2013) Biological Flora of the British Isles: Robinia pseudoacacia. J Ecol 101:1623–1640.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clements DR, Ditommaso A (2011) Climate change and weed adaptation: can evolution of invasive plants lead to greater range expansion than forecasted? Weed Res 51:227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colom MR, Prato EP, Giannini R (2003) Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic response to light in 1-year-old needles during spring and early summer in Pinus leucodermis. Trees 17:207–210.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-002-0222-2 Google Scholar
  12. Csiszár Á, Korda M, Schmidt D, Šporcic D, Süle P, Teleki B, Tiborcz V, Zagyvai G, Bartha D (2013) Allelopathic potential of some invasive plant species occurring in Hungary. Allelopath J 31:309–318Google Scholar
  13. Cui B, Zhang X, Han G, Li K (2016) Antioxidant defense response and growth reaction of Amorpha fruticosa seedlings in petroleum-contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Das A, Parida A, Basak U, Das P (2002) Studies on pigments, proteins and photosynthetic rates in some mangroves and mangrove associates from Bhitarkanika, Orissa. Mar Biol 141:415–422.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-002-0847-0
  15. de Souza ER, dos Santos Freire MBG, da Cunha KPV, do Nascimento CWA, Ruiz HA, Teixeira Lins CM (2012) Biomass, anatomical changes and osmotic potential in Atriplex nummularia Lindl. cultivated in sodic saline soil under water stress. Environ Exp Bot 82:20–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dragota C-SG, InesDumitrascu MEA (2015) Climate variables for the assessment of the invasive terrestrial plant species in the mures floodplain natural park, Romania. In: International multidisciplinary scientific geoconference. SGEM: Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, pp 103–110Google Scholar
  17. Du Z-Y, Wang Q-H, Xing S-J, Liu F-C, Ma B-Y, Ma H-L, Liu D-X (2013) Fine root distribution, characteristics and rhizosphere soil properties in a mixed stand of Robinia pseudoacacia and Fraxinus velutina in a saline soil. Silva Fenn.  https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.970 Google Scholar
  18. Fan X, Pedroli B, Liu G, Liu H, Song C, Shu L (2011) Potential plant species distribution in the Yellow River Delta under the influence of groundwater level and soil salinity. Ecohydrology 4:744–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fan X, Pedroli B, Liu G, Liu Q, Liu H, Shu L (2012) Soil salinity development in the yellow river delta in relation to groundwater dynamics. Land Degrad Dev 23:175–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geel C, Versluis W, Snel JFH (1997) Estimation of oxygen evolution by marine phytoplankton from measurement of the efficiency of photosystem II electron flow. Photosynth Res 51:61–70.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005779112140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 990:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo X, Guo W, Luo Y, Tan X, Du N, Wang R (2013) Morphological and biomass characteristic acclimation of trident maple (Acer buergerianum Miq.) in response to light and water stress. Acta Physiol Plant 35:1149–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu L, Chen L, Liu L, Lou Y, Amombo E, Fu J (2015) Metabolic acclimation of source and sink tissues to salinity stress in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Physiol Plant 155:166–179.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang C, Wei G, Jie Y, Wang L, Zhou H, Ran C, Huang Z, Jia H, Anjum SA (2014) Effects of concentrations of sodium chloride on photosynthesis, antioxidative enzymes, growth and fiber yield of hybrid ramie. Plant Physiol Biochem 76:86–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.12.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Imlay JA (2003) Pathways of oxidative damage. Annu Rev Microbiol 57(1):395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. King JS, Albaugh TJ, Allen HL, Buford M, Strain BR, Dougherty P (2002) Below-ground carbon input to soil is controlled by nutrient availability and fine root dynamics in loblolly pine. New Phytol 154:389–398.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00393.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lessmann JM, Brix H, Bauer V (2001) Effect of climatic gradients on the photosynthetic responses of four Phragmites australis populations. Aquat Bot 69:109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li J (1991) Studies on drought tolerance of some main tree species used in afforestation in Taihang Montain area—general water eco-physiological characteristics (in Chinese with English abstract). J Beijing For Univ 13:10–24Google Scholar
  29. Li B, Wang Y, Xie JX (2008) Primary research on exotic species for garden greening in Changchun (in Chinese with English abstract). J Changchun Normal Univ (Nat Sci) 27:73–77Google Scholar
  30. Li G, Wan S, Zhou J, Yang Z, Qin P (2010) Leaf chlorophyll fluorescence, hyperspectral reflectance, pigments content, malondialdehyde and proline accumulation responses of castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) seedlings to salt stress levels. Ind Crop Prod 31:13–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.07.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lissner J, Schierup H-H, Comı́n FA, Astorga V (1999) Effect of climate on the salt tolerance of two Phragmites australis populations: I. Growth, inorganic solutes, nitrogen relations and osmoregulation. Aquat Bot 64:317–333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(99)00060-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu F, Stützel H (2004) Biomass partitioning, specific leaf area, and water use efficiency of vegetable amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) in response to drought stress. Sci Hortic 102:15–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2003.11.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mehta P, Jajoo A, Mathur S, Bharti S (2010) Chlorophyll a fluorescence study revealing effects of high salt stress on photosystem II in wheat leaves. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:16–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.10.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Meloni DA, Oliva MA, Martinez CA, Cambraia J (2003) Photosynthesis and activity of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and glutathione reductase in cotton under salt stress. Environ Exp Bot 49:69–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00058-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Müller P, Li X-P, Niyogi KK (2001) Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy. Plant Physiol 125:1558–1566CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Munns R (2002) Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ 25:239–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:651–681CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Petrović J, Ćurčić S, Stavretović N (2016) Invasive plant species and ecological factors influencing the spreading in the area of the Obrenovački Zabran Nature Monument (Central Serbia). Šumarski listGoogle Scholar
  39. Praxedes SC, Lacerda CFd, DaMatta FM, Prisco JT, Gomes-Filho E (2010) Salt tolerance is associated with differences in Ion accumulation, biomass allocation and photosynthesis in cowpea cultivars. J Agron Crop Sci 196:193–204.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00412.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Renaulta S, Laita C, Zwiazeka JJ, MacKinnonb M (1998) Effect of high salinity tailings waters produced from gypsum treatment of oil sands tailings on plants of the boreal forest. Environ Pollut 102:177–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(98)00099-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodrı́guez P, Torrecillas A, Morales MA, Ortuño MF, Sánchez-Blanco MJ (2005) Effects of NaCl salinity and water stress on growth and leaf water relations of Asteriscus maritimus plants. Environ Exp Bot 53:113–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schreiber U, Schliwa U, Bilger W (1986) Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photosynth Res 10:51–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Silva EN, Ribeiro RV, Ferreira-Silva SL, Viégas RA, Silveira JAG (2010) Comparative effects of salinity and water stress on photosynthesis, water relations and growth of Jatropha curcas plants. J Arid Environ 74:1130–1137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.05.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skálová H, Havlícková V, Pysek P (2012) Seedling traits, plasticity and local differentiation as strategies of invasive species of Impatiens in central Europe. Ann Bot Lond 110:1429–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sultan SE (2000) Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends Plant Sci 5:537–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Valladares F, Sanchez-Gomez D, Zavala MA (2006) Quantitative estimation of phenotypic plasticity: bridging the gap between the evolutionary concept and its ecological applications. J Ecol 94:1103–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01176.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang RQ, Zhou GY (2000) The vegetation of Shandong province. Shandong Science and Technology Publisher, JinanGoogle Scholar
  48. Wellburn AR, Lichtenthaler H (1984) Formulae and program to determine total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. In: Sybesma C (ed) Advances in photosynthesis research: proceedings of the VIth international congress on photosynthesis, Brussels, August 1–6, 1983. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 9–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6368-4_3
  49. Wu D, Cao B-H, Liu X-L, Zhang D-P (2007) Effect of salt-alkalic stress on content of chlorophyll in leaves of Robinia pseudoacacia and Fraxinus velutina seedling (in Chinese with English abstract). J Northwest For Univ 22:51–54Google Scholar
  50. Yin D, Du N, Xu F, Wang R (2014) Research progress of alien species of Robinia pseudoacacia L. in China (in Chinese with English abstract). Shandong For Sci Technol 6:92–99Google Scholar
  51. Yu W-W, Cao B-H, Cao F-L (2007) Growth, ionic absorption and ionic distribution responses to soil drought and drought-salt stresses in two Robinia pseudoacacia clones (in Chinese with English abstract). J Zhejiang For Coll 24:290–296Google Scholar
  52. Yu J, Li Y, Han G, Zhou D, Fu Y, Guan B, Wang G, Ning K, Wu H, Wang J (2014) The spatial distribution characteristics of soil salinity in coastal zone of the Yellow River Delta. Environ Earth Sci 72:589–599.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2980-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Youssef T, Awad MA (2008) Mechanisms of enhancing photosynthetic gas exchange in date palm seedlings (Phoenix dactylifera L.) under salinity stress by a 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-based fertilizer. J Plant Growth Regul 27:1–9Google Scholar
  54. Zhang J (2014) Strategies for reclaiming and ameliorating saline soil in the Yellow River Delta Region. In: Coastal saline soil rehabilitation and utilization based on forestry approaches in China. Springer, Berlin, pp 55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39915-2_7
  55. Zhang J-F, Xing S-J (2009) Research on soil degradation of Robinia pseudoacacia plantation under environmental stress (in Chinese with English abstract). Chin J Soil Sci 40:1086–1090Google Scholar
  56. Zhang X-Q, Liu J, Welham CVJ, Liu C-C, Li D-N, Chen L, Wang R-Q (2006) The effects of clonal integration on morphological plasticity and placement of daughter ramets in black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia). Flora Morphol Distrib Funct Ecol Plants 201:547–554.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2005.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang CH, Zheng YQ, Liu N, Zong YC, Jiang M, Guo HL (2008) Invasion of Robinia pseudoacacia and impacts on native vegetations (in Chinese with English abstract). J Beijing For Univ 30:18–23Google Scholar
  58. Zou L-N, Zhou Z-Y, Yan S-Y, Qin Y (2011) Effect of salt stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics of Amorpha fruticosa seedlings (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Prataculturae Sin 20:84–90Google Scholar
  59. Zunzunegui M, Ain-Lhout F, Barradas MCD, Álvarez-Cansino L, Esquivias MP, García Novo F (2009) Physiological, morphological and allocation plasticity of a semi-deciduous shrub. Acta Oecol 35:370–379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2009.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiao Guo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiao-Huang Ren
    • 2
  • Franziska Eller
    • 3
  • Ming-Yan Li
    • 2
  • Ren-Qing Wang
    • 2
  • Ning Du
    • 2
  • Wei-Hua Guo
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Landscape Architecture and ForestryQingdao Agricultural UniversityQingdaoPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Life SciencesShandong UniversityJinanPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Bioscience, Aquatic BiologyAarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations