Skip to main content
Log in

Empathy for Non-Kin, the Faraway, the Unfamiliar, and the Abstract––An Interdisciplinary Study on Mencian Moral Cultivation and a Response to Prinz

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article challenges the pessimistic view that empathy and other fellow feelings are biased and erratic motivation for morality. By discussing Mencius’ account on how to develop empathy from its biased and erratic beginnings, I argue that empathy can be extended to less common objects, such as non-kin, the faraway, the unfamiliar, and the abstract. The extension facilitated by empathy in turn enhances one’s moral cognition toward the sufferings of less common objects; the extension also helps to include less common objects into one’s circle of care. I respond to critics of empathy such as Prinz by highlighting the dynamic cultivational process of empathy that they overlook, and further point out that empathy can be cultivated so as to provide a remedy for the biases that no emotion is immune to. This article contributes to the ongoing discussion on moral cultivation in the Chinese philosophy community and the dispute over empathy’s role in morality in contemporary ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1963/1990. On Revolution. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, Charles Daniel. 2009. “These Things Called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomena.” In The Social Neuroscience of Empathy, edited by Jean Decety and William Ickes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2011. Altruism in Humans. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Clore, Gerald L., and Andrew Ortony. 2000. “Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion.” In Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion, edited by Richard D. R. Lane, L. Nadel, G. L. Ahern, J. Allen, and Alfred W. Kaszniak. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coplan, Amy. 2011. “Understanding Empathy.” In Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, edited by Amy Coplan and Peter Goldie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, Jean, and Keith J. Yoder. 2016. “Empathy and Motivation for Justice: Cognitive Empathy and Concern, but Not Emotional Empathy, Predict Sensitivity to Injustice for Others.” Social Neuroscience 11.1: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, Owen. 2014. Moral Sprouts and Natural Teleologies: 21st Century Moral Psychology Meets Classical Chinese Philosophy. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, Owen, and Robert Anthony Williams. 2010. “What Does the Modularity of Morals Have to Do with Ethics? Four Moral Sprouts Plus or Minus a Few.” Topics in Cognitive Science 2.3: 430–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi, and G. Rizzolatti. 1996. “Action Recognition in the Premotor Cortex.” Brain: A Journal of Neurology 119.Pt 2: 593–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, Margaret Olivia. 1995. “Seeing and Caring: The Role of Affect in Feminist Moral Epistemology.” Hypatia 10.3: 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masto, Meghan. 2015. “Empathy and Its Role in Morality.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 53.1: 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, Jesse. 2011a. “Against Empathy.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 49.s1: 214–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2011b. “Is Empathy Necessary for Morality?” In Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, edited by Amy Coplan and Peter Goldie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, Michael. 2007. The Ethics of Care and Empathy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, Paul. 2007. “‘If I Look at the Mass I Will Never Act’: Psychic Numbing and Genocide.” Judgment and Decision Making 2.2: 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoudis, Olga. 2002. “The Influence of Empathy in Mock Jury Criminal Cases: Adding to the Affect Control Model.” Western Criminology Review. 4: 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan W., trans. 2008. Mengzi: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

  • Wong, David B. 2015. “Growing Virtue: The Theory and Science of Developing Compassion from a Mencian Perspective.” In The Philosophical Challenge from China, edited by Brian Bruya. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Bojun 楊伯峻. 1962. The Mengzi: Translation and Commentaries 孟子譯注. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, J. Empathy for Non-Kin, the Faraway, the Unfamiliar, and the Abstract––An Interdisciplinary Study on Mencian Moral Cultivation and a Response to Prinz. Dao 17, 349–362 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-018-9614-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-018-9614-x

Keywords

Navigation