Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 123–129 | Cite as

Significance of using isolated footing technique for residential construction on expansive soils

Research Article

Abstract

Expansive soils cause problems with the founding of lightly loaded structures in many parts of the world. Foundation design for expansive soils is one of the most discussed and problematic issues in Australia as expansive soils were responsible for billions of dollars’ worth of damage to man-made structures such as buildings and roads. Several studies and reports indicate that one of the most common and least recognized problems causing severe structural damage to houses lies in expansive soils. In this study, a critical review has been carried out on the current Australian standards for building on expansive soils and they are compared with some techniques that are not included in the current Australian standards for residential slabs and footings. Based on the results of this review, the most effective and economical method has been proposed for construction of footings on all site classifications without restriction to 75mm of characteristic movement. In addition, it has become apparent that as design procedures for footings resting on sites with extreme characteristic movements are not included in the current Australian standards, there is a strong need for well-developed and simplified standard design procedures for characteristic soil movement of greater than 75mm to be included into the Australian Standards.

Keywords

expansive soils residential slabs isolated footings Australian Standards 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jones L D, Jefferson I. Expansive soils. ICE Manual of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 1: 413–441Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Holland J E. The Design, Performance and Repair of Housing Foundations. Swinburne Institute of Technology, Victoria, Australia, 1981Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Massumi A, Tabatabaiefar H R. Effects of soil-structure interaction on seismic behaviour of ductile reinforced concrete moment resisting frames. In: Proceedings of World Housing Congress on Affordable Quality Housing (WHC2007). Putra, Malaysia, 2007Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fatahi B, Tabatabaiefar H R, Samali B. Performance based assessment of dynamic soil-structure interaction effects on seismic response of building frame. In: Proceedings of Georisk 2011-Geotechnical Risk Assessment & Management (Geotechnical Special Publication No. 224). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2011, 344–351Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Samali B, Fatahi B, Tabatabaiefar H R. Seismic behaviour of Concrete Moment Resisting Buildings on soft soil considering soilstructure Interaction. In: Proceedings of the 21st Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials (ACMSM21), 2011, 407–412Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tabatabaiefar H R, Fatahi B, Samali B. Numerical and experimental investigations on seismic response of building frames under influence of soil-structure interaction. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2014, 17(1): 109–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tabatabaiefar H R, Fatahi B, Samali B. Idealisation of soil-structure system to determine inelastic seismic response of mid-rise building frames. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2014, 66(11): 339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tabatabaiefar H R, Mansoury B, Khadivi Zand M J, Potter D. Mechanical properties of sandwich panels constructed from polystyrene/cement mixed cores and thin cement sheet facings. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, Sage Publications, 2015Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tabatabaiefar H R. Development of synthetic soil mixture for experimental shaking table tests on building frames resting on soft soils. Geomechanics and Geoengineering: An International Journal, 2016 (in Press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tabatabaiefar H R. Detail design and construction procedure of laminar soil containers for experimental shaking table tests. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 10(4): 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tabatabaiefar H R, Mansoury B. Detail design, building and commissioning of tall building structural models for experimental shaking table tests. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2016, 25(8): 357–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cameron D A, Walsh P F. Damage to buildings on clay soils. Australian Council of National Trusts, Victoria, Australia, 1984Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tabatabaiefar H R, Clifton T. Significance of considering soilstructure interaction effects on seismic design of unbraced building frames resting on soft. Australian Geomechnics Journal, 2016, 51(1): 55–64Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mansoury B, Tabatabaiefar H R. Application of sustainable design principles to increase energy efficiency of existing buildings. Building Research Journal, 2016, 6(3): 167–178Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown R. Failure of Houseing Due to Reactivity Can Be Minimised. Australian Structural Engineering Conference (ASEC). Melbourne, 2008Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Richards B G, Peter P, Emerson W W. The effects of vegetation on the swelling and shrinking of soils in Australia. Geotechnique, 1983, 33(2): 127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fityus S G, Smith D W, Allman M A. Expansive soil test site near Newcastle. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2004, 130(7): 686–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McAndrew J. The geological Map of Victoria in Geology of Australia ore deposits. The Eighth Commonwealth Mining and Metallurgical Congress Australia and New Zealand, The Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1965Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dahlhaus P G. Chapter 7: Engineering and Environmental Geology. The Geological Society of Australia Incorporated (Victorian Division), Melbourne, Australia, 1999Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Archicentre Ltd. Cracking in Brickwork. Melbourne, 2000Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    AS2870. Residential Slabs and Footings. Standards Australia, NSW, Australia, 2011Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dafalla M, Al-Shamrani M, Puppala A, Ali H. Design guide for rigid foundation systems on expansive soils. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2012, 12(5): 528–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang H, Lin L, Xiao J, Zhan W. Analysis of the Improvement Effect of Expansive Soil through the Soil-water Characteristic Curve. J. Highway Transp. Res. Dev, 2012, 6: 36–41Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aitchison G D, Holmes J W. Aspects of swelling in the soil profile. Australian Journal of Applied Science, 1953, 4: 244Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cameron D A. Parameters for the design of residential slabs and strip footing. MEng, Victoria Institutes of Colleges (Swinburne College of Technology), 1977Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pitt W G. Correlation Between the Real Behaviour and the Theoretical Design of Residential Raft Slabs, MEng, Swinburne Institute of Technology, 1982Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aitchison G D. Soil Engineering in Australia, in Soils-An Australian Viewpoint. CSIRO, Melbourne, 1993Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    AS2870. Supp1- Residential Slabs and Footings Construction Commentary, Standards Australia, NSW, Australia, 1996Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cameron D A, Yttrup P J. Footings for light structure on the reactive soils of Melbourne. In: Proceedings of the seminar on engineering geology of Melbourne. Melbourne, Australia, 16 September, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1992, 345–354Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kropp A. Survey of residential foundation design practice on expansive soils in the San Francisco Bay. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2011, 25(1): 24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li J, Cameron D A, Ren G. Case study and back analysis of a residential building damaged by expansive soils. Computers and Geotechnics, 2013, 56: 89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Houston S L, Dye H B, Zapata C E, Walsh K D, Houston W N. Study of expansive soils and residential foundations on expansive soils in Arizona. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2011, 25(1): 31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brown B J, Goldsmith P R, Shorten J P M, Henderson L. Soil Expansively in Auckland Region. Study Report, No. 120, Building Research Levy, 2003Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Seco A, Ramírez F, Miqueleiz L, García B. Stabilization of expansive soils for use in construction. Applied Clay Science, 2011, 51(3): 348–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jones M. NHBC Technical Extra, Issue 15, 2014Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen F H. Foundations on Expansive Soils. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co, Ltd, 1979Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nelson J D, Miller D J. Expansive Soils: Problems and Practice in Foundation, Department of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University, Wiley, New York, 1992Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Standards NHBC. National House Building Council. Chapter 4, 2011Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    AS3600. Concrete Structures. Standards Australia, NSW, Australia, 2009Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cameron D A, Walsh P F. The Pile Experiment. CSRIO, Division of Building Research Report, 1983Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Built Infrastructure Research, School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Technology Sydney (UTS)SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations