Advertisement

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 481–487 | Cite as

Model test of stone columns as liquefaction countermeasure in sandy soils

  • Mengfei Qu
  • Qiang Xie
  • Xinwen Cao
  • Wen Zhao
  • Jianjun He
  • Jiang Jin
Research Article

Abstract

The shaking table model test was conducted to investigate earthquake resistant behavior of stone columns under the intensity of an earthquake resistance of buildings is VIII. The test results show that when acceleration is less than 0.20 g, composite foundation is not liquefied, settlement is also small and pile dislocation is not observed; when acceleration is 0.3g, ground outside embankment’s slope toe is liquefied and ground within stone column composite foundation is not. It is suggesting that reinforcement scale of stone column foundation should be widened properly. The designed stone column composite foundation meets the requirements for seismic resistance.

Keywords

stone column composite foundation seismic liquefaction shaking table test 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yang G Q. Construction technique for treating vibrating liquefied foundation of high-speed railway line by dry vibrating crushed stone pile. Journal of railway engineering society, 2004, (2): 31–34Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Englehardt K, Golding H C. Field testing to evaluate stone column performance in a seismic area. Geotechnique, 1975, 25(1): 61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sasaki Y, Taniguchi E. Shaking table tests on gravel drains to prevent liquefaction of sand deposits. Soil and Foundation, 1982, 22(3): 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baez J I, Martin G R. Permeability and shear wave velocity of vibroreplacement stone columns. Soil Improvement for Earthquake Hazard Mitigation. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, 1995, 49: 66–81Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boulanger R W, Idriss I M, Stewart D P, Hashash Y, Schmidt B. Draigage capacity of stone columns or gravel drains for mitigating liquefaction. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, 1998, 1: 678–690Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adalier K, Elgamal A, Meneses J, Baez J I. Stone columns as liquefaction countermeasure in non-plastic silty soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2003, 23(7): 571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang C X, Zhang H Y, Sui Z L, Jin J J. Shaking table test on liquefaction properties of saturated sand ground. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(12): 2098–2103Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiang G L, Liu X F, Zhang J W, Zhao R Y. Shaking table test of composite foundation reinforcement of saturated silty soil ground for high speed railway. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006, 41(2): 190–196Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhattacharya S, Hyodo M, Goda K, Tazoh T, Taylor C A. Liquefaction of soil in the Tokyo Bay area from the 2011 Tohoku (Japan) earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(11): 1618–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li J Y. Application of foundation treatment with vibro-replacement stone piles to Yinping hydropower station. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(S): 2968–2976Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Asgari A, Oliaei M, Bagheri M. Numerical simulation of improvement of a liquefiable soil layer using stone column and pile-pinning techniques. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 51: 77–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhan Y X, Jiang G L, Yao H L. Dynamic characteristics of saturated silty soil ground treated by stone column composite foundation. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2014, 3: 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forcellini D, Tarantino A M. Assessment of stone columns as a mitigation technique of liquefaction-induced effects during Italian earthquakes (May 2012). The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 2014(1): 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liang T, Cong S Y, Ling X Z, Lu J C, Elgamal A. Numerical study on ground improvement for liquefaction mitigation using stone columns encased with geosynthetics. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2015, 43(2): 190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Finn WD L, Fujita N. Piles in liquefiable soils: seismic analysis and design issues. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, 22 (9-12): 731–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhuang X, Augarde C, Mathisen K. Fracture modelling using meshless methods and level sets in 3D: framework and modelling. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2012, 92(11): 969–998MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zheng W B, Zhuang X Y, Dwayne D. Tannant, Cai Y C, Samuel Nunoo. A continuous/discontinuous deformation analysis (CDDA) method based on deformable blocks for fracture modeling. Frontiers of Structural & Civil Engineering, 2013, 7(4): 369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Budarapu P R, Javvaji B, Sutrakar V K, Roy Mahapatra D, Zi G, Rabczuk T. Crack propagation in graphene. Journal of Applied Physics, 2015, 118(6): 064307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sudhir Sastry Y B, Budarapu P R, Madhavi N, Krishna Y. Buckling analysis of thin wall stiffened composite panels. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 96B: 459–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Budarapu P R, Narayana T S S, Rammohan B, Rabczuk T. Directionality of sound radiation from rectangular panels. Applied Acoustics, 2015, 89: 128–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang S W, Budarapu P R, Mahapatra D R, Bordas S P A, Zi G, Rabczuk T. A meshless adaptive multiscale method for fracture. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 96(B): 382–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sudhir Sastry Y B, Budarapu P R, Krishna Y, Devaraj S. Studies on ballistic impact of the composite panels. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 72: 2–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Budarapu P R, Sudhir Sastry Y B, Javvaji B, Mahapatra D R. Vibration analysis of multi-walled carbon nanotubes embedded in elastic medium. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2014, 8(2): 151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Budarapu P R, Gracie R, Yang SW, Zhaung X, Rabczuk T. Efficient coarse graining in multiscale modeling of fracture. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 69: 126–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Budarapu P R, Gracie R, Bordas S P A, Rabczuk T. An adaptive multiscale method for quasi-static crack growth. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(6): 1129–1148CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mengfei Qu
    • 1
  • Qiang Xie
    • 1
  • Xinwen Cao
    • 2
  • Wen Zhao
    • 1
  • Jianjun He
    • 1
  • Jiang Jin
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.School of Civil EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations