Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 499–505 | Cite as

Effects of inner sleeves on the inner frictional resistance of open-ended piles driven into sand

  • Janaka J. Kumara
  • Yoshiaki Kikuchi
  • Takashi Kurashina
  • Takahiro Yajima
Research Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

In open-ended piles, inner friction is developed between inner pile shaft and the inner soil. Inner frictional resistance depends largely on the degree of soil plugging, which is influenced by many factors including pile diameter, relative density and end conditions of piles. In this paper, effects of inner sleeves on inner frictional resistance are discussed. The experiments were conducted on a medium-dense sandy ground using laboratory-scale piles. It was observed that the piles penetrated under partially-plugged or unplugged state. The results suggest that inner frictional resistance, Qin increases with sleeve height, l linearly and requires 2D (D is pile outer diameter) of l to produce a large as 50% of Qt by Qin (Qt is total resistance). The results also indicate that bearing capacity increases with wall thickness at the pile tip, which can be attributed to the increase in annular area. The results also indicate that soil plug height is independent of sleeve height. The results also reveal that the penetration of straight piles is closer to unplugged state than the sleeved piles. The results of incremental filling ratio and plug length ratio also indicate that the degree of soil plugging is affected by the sleeve height.

Keywords

bearing capacity inner frictional resistance inner sleeve open-ended piles soil plugging 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Szechy C H. The effect of vibration and driving upon the voids in granular soil surrounding a pile. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Paris, France, 1961, 2: 161–164Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Randolph M F, Steinfelt J S, Wroth C P. The effect of pile type on design parameters for driven piles. In: Proceedings of 7th European Conference on Soil Mechanics. London, England, 1979, 2: 107–114Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paikowsky S G, Whitman R V. The effects of plugging on pile performance and design. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1990, 27 (4): 429–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nauroy J F, Tirant L P. Model tests of piles in calcareous sands. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Geotechnical Practice in Offshore Engineering. Texas, United States, 1983, 356–369.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lehane B M, Randolph M F. Evaluation of a minimum base resistance for driven pipe piles in siliceous sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2002, 128(3): 198–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tomlinson MJ. Pile Design and Construction Practice. London: E & FN Spon, 2004Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kikuchi Y. Mechanism of inner friction of an open-ended pile. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IPA International Workshop (Press-in Engineering 2011). Shanghai, China, 2011, 65–83Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paik K, Salgado R. Effect of pile installation method on pipe pile behavior in sands. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2004, 27(1): 11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paik K, Salgado R. Determination of bearing capacity of openended piles in sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(1): 46–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paik K, Salgado R, Lee J, Kim B. Behavior of open-and closedended piles driven into sands. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(4): 296–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    JRA. Specifications for highway bridges. Japan Road Association (JRA), Tokyo, Japan, 2002 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jardine R J, Chow F C. New Design Methods for Offshore Piles. London: MTD publication, 1996Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    API. Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms–Working Stress Design. American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA, 2005Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lehane B M, Schneider J A, Xu X. A review of design methods for offshore driven piles in siliceous sand. Perth, Australia, UWA Report No. GEO, 2005, 05358: 683–689Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schneider J A, Xu X, Lehane B M. Database assessment of CPTbased design methods for axial capacity of driven piles in siliceous sands. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2008, 134(9): 1227–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hettler A. Approximation formulae for piles under tension. In: Proceedings of IUTAM Conference on Deformation and Failure of Granular Materials. Delft, Netherlands, 1982, 603–608Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paikowsky S G, Whitman R V, Baligh M M. A new look at the phenomenon of offshore pile plugging. Marine Geotechnology, 1989, 8(3): 213–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paik K H, Lee D R. Behavior of soil plugs in open ended model piles driven into sands. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 1993, 11(4): 353–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janaka J. Kumara
    • 1
  • Yoshiaki Kikuchi
    • 1
  • Takashi Kurashina
    • 1
  • Takahiro Yajima
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringTokyo University of ScienceNodaJapan
  2. 2.Maeda CorporationTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations