Frontiers in Energy

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 155–167 | Cite as

Influence of increasing numbers of RE-inverters on the power quality in the distribution grids: A PQ case study of a representative wind turbine and photovoltaic system

Research Article
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents the selected power quality (PQ) indicia of a wind generator and a photovoltaic installation considered to be the representative of medium voltage and low voltage distribution grids. The analysis of measured values suggests that the decrease in PQ is a case of specific combination of distributed generation, grid parameters and load behaviour. Modern generators have a limited impact on PQ. On the other hand, fluctuations in power generation are regarded as an emerging PQ indicator. The growing number of distributed renewable installations causes stochastic, variable, and hardly predictable power flows in the distribution grid. The nature of fluctuations in wind and solar generation is different. In both cases, new indexes for the quantification of fluctuations are needed and are yet not standardised. Proper assessment of these fluctuations enables definition of useful fluctuation limits and rules for optimal storage system integration.

Keywords

power quality harmonics sags photovoltaic (PV) system doubly feed induction generator (DFIG) inverters 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Parliament E. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on the promotion of use of energy from renewable sources, 2009Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    By EU. Directive 2001/77/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in the internal electricity marked, 2001Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foxpenner P. Smart Power: Climate Change, the Smart Grid and the Future of Electric Utilities. Washington: Island Press, 2010Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bollen M H, Hassan F. Integration of Distributed Generation in the Power System. John Chichester: Willey-IEEE Press, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    CIGRE. Impact of increasing contribution of dispersed generation on the power system. CIGRE Study Committee No 37, Final Report, 1998Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    IEEE Standard 1547. IEEE Standard for interconnecting distributed resources with electrical power systems. Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers Inc, 2003Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    BSI. Standard EN50438–2013. Requirements for the connection of micro-generators in parallel with public low-voltage distribution networks, 2013Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baggini A. Handbook of Power Quality. Hoboke: John Willey & Sons, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caramia P, Carpinelli G, Verde P. Power Quality Indices in Liberalized Markets. Hoboke: John Willey & Sons, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Janik P. Photovoltaic Power Generation Assessment Based on Advanced Signal Processing and Optimisation Techniques. Wroclaw: Publishing house of Wroclaw University of Science and Technology Wroclaw, 2014Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    CENELEC EN 50160–2010. Voltage characteristics of electricity supplied by public electricity networksGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Standard IEC61000-2-2–2002. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)–Part 2-2: environment-compatibility levels for low-frequency conducted disturbances and signalling in public low-voltage power supply systemsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Standard IEC61000-2-4–2002. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)–Part 2-4: environment-compatibility levels in industrial plants for low-frequency conducted disturbancesGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Standard IEC61000-2-12–2002. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)–Part 2-12: environment-compatibility levels for lowfrequency conducted disturbances and signaling in public medium-voltage power supply systemsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Standard IEC61000-4-7–2010. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)–Part 4-7: testing and measurement techniques-general guide on harmonics and inter harmonics measurements and instrumentation, for power supply systems and equipment connected theretoGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Standard IEC 61000-4-15–2010. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)–Part 4-15: testing and measurement techniques-Flickermeter-Functional and design specificationsGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Standard IEC61000-4-30–2008. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)–Part 4-30: testing and measurement techniques–Power quality measurement methodsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    The windpower. 2016–10–28, http://www.thewindpower.net/turbine_en_29_vestas_1800Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Standard IEC61000-3-2–2014. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)–Part 3-2: limits for harmonic current emissions (equipment input current≤ 16 A per phase)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Standard IEC61000-3-3–2013. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)–Part 3-3: limits–limitation of voltage changes, voltage fluctuations and flicker in public low-voltage supply systems, for equipment with rated current ≤ 16 A per phase and not subject to conditional connectionGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brandenburg University of TechnologyCottbus-SenftenbergGermany
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringWroclaw University of Science and TechnologyWroclawPoland
  3. 3.Department for Energy Distribution and High Voltage EngineeringBrandenburg University of TechnologyCottbus-SenftenbergGermany

Personalised recommendations