Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Parameter transferability across spatial resolutions in urban hydrological modelling: a case study in Beijing, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Earth Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the influence of spatial resolution on model parameterization, output, and the parameter transferability between different resolutions using the Storm Water Management Model. High-resolution models, in which most subcatchments were homogeneous, and high-resolution-based low-resolution models (in 3 scenarios) were constructed for a highly urbanized catchment in Beijing. The results indicated that the parameterization and simulation results were affected by both spatial resolution and rainfall characteristics. The simulated peak inflow and total runoff volume were sensitive to the spatial resolution, but did not show a consistent tendency. High-resolution models performed very well for both calibration and validation events in terms of three indexes: 1) the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, 2) the peak flow error, and 3) the volume error; indication of the advantage of using these models. The parameters obtained from high-resolution models could be directly used in the low-resolution models and performed well in the simulation of heavy rain and torrential rain and in the study area where sub-area routing is insignificant. Alternatively, sub-area routing should be considered and estimated approximately. The successful scale conversion from high spatial resolution to low spatial resolution is of great significance for the hydrological simulation of ungauged large areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baek S S, Choi D H, Jung J W, Lee H J, Lee H, Yoon K S, Cho K H (2015). Optimizing low impact development (LID) for stormwater runoff treatment in urban area, Korea: experimental and modeling approach. Water Res, 86: 122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barco J, Wong K M, Stenstrom MK (2008). Automatic calibration of the U.S. EPA SWMM model for a large urban catchment. J Hydraul Eng, 134(4): 466–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedient P B, Huber W C (2002). Hydrology and Flood Plain Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Blöschl G, Sivapalan M (1995). Scale issues in hydrological modelling: a review. Hydrol Processes, 9(3–4): 251–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borris M, Viklander M, Gustafsson A M, Marsalek J (2014). Modelling the effects of changes in rainfall event characteristics on TSS loads in urban runoff. Hydrol Processes, 28(4): 1787–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen A S, Evans B, Djordjević S, Savić D A (2012). A coarse-grid approach to representing building blockage effects in 2D urban flood modelling. J Hydrol (Amst), 426–427(6): 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow M F, Yusop Z, Toriman M E (2012). Modelling runoff quantity and quality in tropical urban catchments using storm water management model. Int J Environ Sci Technol, 9(4): 737–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • di Pierro F, Khu S T, Savi D (2006). From single-objective to multipleobjective multiple-rainfall events automatic calibration of urban storm water runoff models using genetic algorithms. Water Sci Technol, 54(6–7): 57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott A H, Trowsdale S A, Wadhwa S (2009). Effect of aggregation of on-site storm-water control devices in an urban catchment model. J Hydrol Eng, 14(9): 975–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh I, Hellweger F L (2012). Effects of spatial resolution in urban hydrologic simulations. J Hydrol Eng, 17(1): 129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooré Bi E, Monette F, Gachon P, Gaspéri J, Perrodin Y (2015). Quantitative and qualitative assessment of the impact of climate change on a combined sewer overflow and its receiving water body. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 22(15): 11905–11921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber W C, Dickinson R E, Barnwell T O Jr, Branch A (1988). Storm water management model; version 4. Environmental Protection Agency, United States

    Google Scholar 

  • James W, Huber W, Dickinson R, Pitt R, Roesner L, Aldrich J (2003). User’s Guide to PCSWMM. Computational Hydraulics International: Guelph, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Knighton J, White E, Lennon E, Rajan R (2014). Development of probability distributions for urban hydrologicmodel parameters and a Monte Carlo analysis of model sensitivity. Hydrol Processes, 28(19): 5131–5139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs G, Kokkonen T, Valtanen M, Koivusalo H, Setälä H (2013). A high resolution application of a stormwater management model (SWMM) using genetic parameter optimization. Urban Water J, 10 (6): 394–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs G, Kokkonen T, Valtanen M, Setälä H, Koivusalo H (2014). Spatial resolution considerations for urban hydrological modelling. J Hydrol (Amst), 512: 482–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leandro J, Schumann A, Pfister A (2016). A step towards considering the spatial heterogeneity of urban key features in urban hydrology flood modelling. J Hydrol (Amst), 535: 356–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liong S Y, Chan W T, Lum L H (1991). Knowledge-based system for SWMM runoff component calibration. J Water Resour Plan Manage, 117(5): 507–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen H (2003). Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives. Adv Water Resour, 26(2): 205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melsen L, Teuling A, Torfs P, Zappa M, Mizukami N, Clark M, Uijlenhoet R (2016). Representation of spatial and temporal variability in large-domain hydrological models: case study for a mesoscale pre-alpine basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss, 20: 1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palla A, Gnecco I (2015). Hydrologic modeling of low impact development systems at the urban catchment scale. J Hydrol (Amst), 528: 361–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S Y, Lee K W, Park I H, Ha S R (2008). Effect of the aggregation level of surface runoff fields and sewer network for a SWMM simulation. Desalination, 226(1–3): 328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peel M C, Blöschl G (2011). Hydrological modelling in a changing world. Prog Phys Geogr, 35(2): 249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson E W, Wicks C M (2006). Assessing the importance of conduit geometry and physical parameters in karst systems using the storm water management model (SWMM). J Hydrol (Amst), 329(1‒2): 294–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter A, Muñoz-Carpena R (2013). Performance evaluation of hydrological models: statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments. J Hydrol (Amst), 480: 33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa D J, Clausen J C, Dietz M E (2015). Calibration and verification of SWMM for low impact development. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 51 (3): 746–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman L A (2010). Storm water management model user’s manual, version 5.0. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen Z Y, Chen L, Liao Q, Liu R M, Huang Q (2013). A comprehensive study of the effect of GIS data on hydrology and non-point source pollution modeling. Agric Water Manage, 118: 93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Z, Hou X, Li W, Aini G (2014). Relating landscape characteristics to non-point source pollution in a typical urbanized watershed in the municipality of Beijing. Landsc Urban Plan, 123: 96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun N, Hall M, Hong B, Zhang L (2014). Impact of SWMM catchment discretization: case study in Syracuse, New York. J Hydrol Eng, 19 (1): 223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Zheng Y, Wu B, Wu X, Liu L, Zheng C (2015). Modeling surface water-groundwater interaction in arid and semi-arid regions with intensive agriculture. Environ Model Softw, 63: 170–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsihrintzis V A, Hamid R (1998). Runoff quality prediction from small urban catchments using SWMM. Hydrol Processes, 12(2): 311–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaze J, Chiew F H (2003). Comparative evaluation of urban storm water quality models. Water Resour Res, 39(10): 1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vojinovic Z, Tutulic D (2009). On the use of 1D and coupled 1D-2D modelling approaches for assessment of flood damage in urban areas. Urban Water J, 6(3): 183–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K H, Altunkaynak A (2012). Comparative case study of rainfallrunoff modeling betweenSWMMand fuzzy logic approach. J Hydrol Eng, 17(2): 283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaghloul N A (1981). SWMM model and level of discretization. J Hydraul Div, 107(11): 1535–1545

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Vaze J, Chiew F H, Teng J, Li M (2014). Predicting hydrological signatures in ungauged catchments using spatial interpolation, index model, and rainfall-runoff modelling. J Hydrol (Amst), 517: 936–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao D Q, Chen J N, Wang H Z, Tong O Y, Chao S B, Sheng Z (2009). GIS-based urban rainfall-runoff modeling using an automatic catchment-discretization approach: a case study in Macau. Environ Earth Sci, 59(2): 465–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the State Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41530635), the Fund for Innovative Research Group of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51421065), Open Research Fund Program of Key Laboratory of Urban Storm Water System and Water Environment, Ministry of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China

    Xiaoshu Hou, Lei Chen & Zhenyao Shen

  2. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Xiaoshu Hou, Xiang Liu & Miao Li

Authors
  1. Xiaoshu Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Miao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhenyao Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenyao Shen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, X., Chen, L., Liu, X. et al. Parameter transferability across spatial resolutions in urban hydrological modelling: a case study in Beijing, China. Front. Earth Sci. 13, 18–32 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-018-0710-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-018-0710-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation