Advertisement

Frontiers of Earth Science

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 447–456 | Cite as

The significance of small streams

  • Ellen Wohl
Review

Abstract

Headwaters, defined here as first- and secondorder streams, make up 70%‒80% of the total channel length of river networks. These small streams exert a critical influence on downstream portions of the river network by: retaining or transmitting sediment and nutrients; providing habitat and refuge for diverse aquatic and riparian organisms; creating migration corridors; and governing connectivity at the watershed-scale. The upstream-most extent of the channel network and the longitudinal continuity and lateral extent of headwaters can be difficult to delineate, however, and people are less likely to recognize the importance of headwaters relative to other portions of a river network. Consequently, headwaters commonly lack the legal protections accorded to other portions of a river network and are more likely to be significantly altered or completely obliterated by land use.

Keywords

headwaters hydrology water quality land use connectivity resilience 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams R K, Spotila J A (2005). The form and function of headwater streams based on field and modeling investigations in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Earth Surf Process Landf, 30(12): 1521–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams S B, Frissell C A, Rieman B E (2001). Geography of invasion in mountain streams: consequences of headwater lake fish introductions. Ecosystems (N Y), 4(4): 296–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander R B, Boyer E W, Smith R A, Schwarz G E, Moore R B (2007). The role of headwater streams in downstream water quality. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 43(1): 41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allan J D (1995). Stream Ecology. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic PublishersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arthington A H, Bernardo J M, Ilheu M (2014). Temporary rivers: linking ecohydrology, ecological quality and reconciliation ecology. River Res Appl, 30(10): 1209–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battin T J, Kaplan L A, Findlay S, Hopkinson C S, Marti E, Packman A I, Newbold J D, Sabater F (2008). Biophysical controls on organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks. Nat Geosci, 1(2): 95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baxter C V, Fausch K D, Saunders W C (2005). Tangled webs: reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones. Freshw Biol, 50(2): 201–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beasley C A, Hightower J E (2000). Effects of a low-head dam on the distribution and characteristics of spawning habitat used by striped bass and American shad. Trans Am Fish Soc, 129(6): 1316–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benda L, Hassan M A, Church M, May C L (2005). Geomorphology of steepland headwaters: the transition from hillslopes to channels. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 41(4): 835–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernhardt E S, Palmer M A (2011). The environmental costs of mountaintop mining valley fill operations for aquatic ecosystems of the Central Appalachians. Year Ecol Conserv Biol, 1223: 39–57Google Scholar
  11. Campbell I C, Doeg T J (1989). Impact of timber harvesting and production on streams: a review. Mar Freshw Res, 40(5): 519–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dietrich W E, Dunne T (1993). The channel head. In: Beven K, Kirkby M J, eds. Channel Network Hydrology. Chichester, UK: Wiley and Sons, 175–219Google Scholar
  13. Dietrich W E, Wilson C J, Montgomery D R, McKean J (1993). Analysis of erosion thresholds, channel networks, and landscape morphology using a digital terrain model. J Geol, 101(2): 259–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dietrich W E, Wilson C J, Montgomery D R, McKean J, Bauer R (1992). Erosion thresholds and land surface morphology. Geology, 20(8): 675–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dodds W K, Oakes R M (2008). Headwater influences on downstream water quality. Environ Manage, 41(3): 367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Downing J A, Cole J J, Duarte C M, Middelburg J J, Melack J M, Prairie Y T, Kortelainen P, Striegl R G, McDowell W H, Tranvik L J (2012). Global abundance and size distribution of streams and rivers. Inland Waters, 2(4): 229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elmore A J, Kaushal S S (2008). Disappearing headwaters: patterns of stream burial due to urbanization. Front Ecol Environ, 6(6): 308–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Falke J A, Fausch K D, Magelky R, Aldred A, Durnford D S, Riley L K, Oad R (2011). The role of groundwater pumping and drought in shaping ecological futures for stream fishes in a dryland river basin of the western Great Plains, USA. Ecohydrology, 4(5): 682–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferguson R (2007). Flow resistance equations for gravel-and boulderbed streams. Water Resour Res, 43(5): doi: 10.1029/2006WR005422Google Scholar
  20. Freeman M C, Pringle C M, Jackson C R (2007). Hydrologic connectivity and the contribution of stream headwaters to ecological integrity at regional scales. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 43(1): 5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. FSSSWG (Forest Service Stream-Simulation Working Group) (2008). Stream Simulation: An Ecological Approach to Providing Passage for Aquatic Organisms at Road-Stream Crossings. USDA Forest Service National Technology and Development Program, 0877: 1801 (-SDTDC, San Dimas, CA.)Google Scholar
  22. Gomez B, Church M (1989). An assessment of bed load sediment transport formulae for gravel bed rivers. Water Resour Res, 25(6): 1161–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gomi T, Sidle R C, Richardson J S (2002). Understanding processes and downstream linkages of headwater systems. Bioscience, 52(10): 905–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gooseff M N, Hall R O Jr, Tank J L (2007). Relating transient storage to channel complexity in streams of varying land use in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Water Resour Res, 43(1), doi: 10.1029/2005WR004626Google Scholar
  25. Griffith (1998). Lateral dispersal of the adult aquatic insects (Plecoptera, Trichoptera) following emergence from headwater streams in forested Appalachian catchments. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 91 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aesa/91.2.195Google Scholar
  26. Grimm N B, Sheibley R W, Crenshaw C L, Dahm C N, Roach W J, Zeglin L H (2005). N retention and transformation in urban streams. J N Am Benthol Soc, 24(3): 626–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heine R A, Lant C L, Sengupta R R (2004). Development and comparison of approaches for automated mapping of stream channel networks. Ann Assoc Am Geogr, 94(3): 477–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henkle J E, Wohl E, Beckman N (2011). Locations of channel heads in the semiarid Colorado Front Range, USA. Geomorphology, 129(3-4): 309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howarth R W (2008). Coastal nitrogen pollution: a review of sources and trends globally and regionally. Harmful Algae, 8(1): 14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ijjasz-Vasquez E J, Bras R L (1995). Scaling regimes of local slope versus contributing area in digital elevation models. Geomorphology, 12(4): 299–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Istanbulluoglu E, Tarboton D G, Pack R T, Luce C (2002). A probabilistic approach for channel initiation. Water Resour Res, 38(12): 61-1–61-14Google Scholar
  32. Jaeger K L, Montgomery D R, Bolton S M (2007). Channel and perennial flow initiation in headwater streams: management implications of variability in source-area size. Environ Manage, 40 (5): 775–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jaeger K L, Olden J D (2012). Electrical resistance sensor arrays as a means to quantify longitudinal connectivity of rivers. River Res Appl, 28(10): 1843–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jaeger K L, Olden J D, Pelland N A (2014). Climate change poised to threaten hydrologic connectivity and endemic fishes in dryland streams. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 111(38): 13894–13899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jefferson A J, McGee R W (2013). Channel network extent in the context of historical land use, flow generation processes, and landscape evolution in the North Carolina Piedmont. Earth Surf Process Landf, 38(6): 601–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones A (1971). Soil piping and stream channel initiation. Water Resour Res, 7(3): 602–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Julian J P, Elmore A J, Guinn S M (2012). Channel head locations in forested watersheds across the mid-Atlantic United States: a physiographic analysis. Geomorphology, 177-178: 194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leibowitz S G, Wigington P J Jr, Rains M C, Downing D M (2008). Non-navigable streams and adjacent wetlands: addressing science needs following the Supreme Court’s Rapanos decision. Front Ecol Environ, 6(7): 364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MacDonald L H, Coe D (2007). Influence of headwater streams on downstream reaches in forested areas. For Sci, 53: 148–168Google Scholar
  40. McClain M E, Naiman R J (2008). Andean influences on the biogeochemistry and ecology of the Amazon River. Bioscience, 58 (4): 325–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McGlynn B L, McDonnell J J, Seibert J, Kendall C (2004). Scale effects on headwater catchment runoff timing, flow sources, and groundwater-streamflow relations. Water Resour Res, 40(7): doi: 10.1029/2003WR002494Google Scholar
  42. Mersel M K, Lichvar R W (2014). A guide to ordinary high water mark (OHWM) delineation for non-perennial streams in the western mountains, valleys, and coast regions of the United States. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ERDC/CRREL TR-14-13, Hannover, NHGoogle Scholar
  43. Meyer J L, Kaplan L A, Newbold D, Woltemade C J, Zedler J B, Beilfuss R, Carpenter Q, Semlitsch R, Watzin M C, Zedler P H (2007b). Where rivers are born: the scientific imperative for defending small streams and wetlands. Sierra Club, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  44. Meyer J L, Strayer D L, Wallace J B, Eggert S L, Helfman G S, Leonard N E (2007a). The contribution of headwater streams to biodiversity in river networks. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 43(1): 86–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meyer J L, Wallace J B (2001). Lost linkages and lotic ecology: rediscovering small streams. In: Press M C, Huntly N J, Levin S, eds. Ecology: Achievement and Challenge. Orlando, FL: Blackwell Science, 295–317Google Scholar
  46. Montgomery D R, Beamer E M, Pess G R, Quinn T P (1999). Channel type and salmonid spawning distribution and abundance. Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 56(3): 377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Montgomery D R, Dietrich W E (1988). Where do channels begin? Nature, 336(6196): 232–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Montgomery D R, Dietrich W E (1989). Source areas, drainage density, and channel initiation. Water Resour Res, 25(8): 1907–1918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Montgomery D R, Dietrich W E (1992). Channel initiation and the problem of landscape scale. Science, 255(5046): 826–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Montgomery D R, Foufoula-Georgiou E (1993). Channel network source representation using digital elevation models. Water Resour Res, 29(12): 3925–3934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nadeau T L, Rains M C (2007). Hydrological connectivity between headwater streams and downstream waters: how science can inform policy. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 43(1): 118–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nakano S, Murakami M (2001). Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 98(1): 166–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nihlgard B J, Swank W T, Mitchell M J (1994). Biological processes and catchment studies. In: Moldan B, Cerny J, eds. Biogeochemistry of Small Catchments: A Tool for Environmental Research. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 133–161Google Scholar
  54. Osterkamp W R (2008). Annotated definitions of selected geomorphic terms and related terms of hydrology, sedimentology, soil science and ecology. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2008-1217, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  55. Palmer M A, Bernhardt E S, Schlesinger W H, Eshleman K N, Foufoula- Georgiou E, Hendryx M S, Lemly A D, Likens G E, Loucks O L, Power M E, White P S, Wilcock P R (2010). Mountaintop mining consequences. Science, 327(5962): 148–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Paul M J, Meyer J L (2001). Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 32(1): 333–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Petersen R C, Madsen B L, Wilzbach M W, Magadza C H, Paarlberg A, Kullberg A, Cummins K W (1987). Stream management: emerging global similarities. Ambio, 16: 166–179Google Scholar
  58. Peterson B J, Wollheim W M, Mulholland P J, Webster J R, Meyer J L, Tank J L, Marti E, Bowden W B, Valett H M, Hershey A E, McDowell W H, Dodds W K, Hamilton S K, Gregory S, Morrall D D (2001). Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams. Science, 292(5514): 86–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Polvi L E, Wohl E (2013). Biotic drivers of stream planform: implications for understanding the past and restoring the future. Bioscience, 63(6): 439–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pond G J, Fritz K M, Johnson B R (2016). Macroinvertebrate and organic matter export from headwater tributaries of a Central Appalachian stream. Hydrobiologia, 779(1): 75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Prosser I P, Abernethy B (1996). Predicting the topographic limits to a gully network using a digital terrain model and process thresholds. Water Resour Res, 32(7): 2289–2298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Prosser I P, Dietrich W E (1995). Field experiments on erosion by overland flow and their implication for a digital terrain model of channel initiation. Water Resour Res, 31(11): 2867–2876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reynolds L V, Shafroth P B, Poff N L (2015). Modeled intermittency risk for small streams in the Upper Colorado River Basin under climate change. J Hydrol (Amst), 523: 768–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ricciardi A, Rasmussen J B (1999). Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conserv Biol, 13(5): 1220–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Richardson J S, Bilby R E, Bondar C A (2005). Organic matter dynamics in small streams of the Pacific Northwest. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 41(4): 921–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Richardson J S, Danehy R J (2007). A synthesis of the ecology of headwater streams and their riparian zones in temperate forests. For Sci, 53: 131–147Google Scholar
  67. Sawyer A H, Bayani Cardenas M, Buttles J (2012). Hyporheic temperature dynamics and heat exchange near channel-spanning logs. Water Resour Res, 48(1): W01529Google Scholar
  68. Schlosser I J (1995). Critical landscape attributes that influence fish population dynamics in headwater streams. Hydrobiologia, 303(1-3): 71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schumm S A (1977). The Fluvial System. New York: Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
  70. Smock L A, Gladden J E, Riekenberg J L, Smith L C, Black C R (1992). Lotic macroinvertebrate production in three dimensions: channel surface, hyporheic, and floodplain environments. Ecology, 73(3): 876–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Speaker R, Moore K, Gregory S (1984). Analysis of the process of retention of organic matter in stream ecosystems. Verh Internat Verein Limnol, 22: 1835–1841Google Scholar
  72. Stanford J A, Ward J V (1988). The hyporheic habitat of river ecosystems. Nature, 335(6185): 64–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Strahler A N (1952). Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 63(11): 1117–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sweeney B W, Bott T L, Jackson J K, Kaplan L A, Newbold J D, Standley L J, Hession C W, Horwitz R J (2004). Riparian deforestation, stream narrowing, and loss of stream ecosystem services. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101(39): 14132–14137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tarboton D G, Bras R L, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (1991). On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. Hydrol Processes, 5(1): 81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tarolli P, Dalla Fontana G (2009). Hillslope-to-valley transition morphology: new opportunities from high resolution DTMs. Geomorphology, 113(1-2): 47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tockner K, Malard F, Ward J V (2000). An extension of the flood pulse concept. Hydrol Processes, 14(16-17): 2861–2883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2012). 2012 Nationwide Permits, Conditions, District Engineer’s Decision, Further Information, and Definitions. http://www.usace.army.mil/Portals/2/docs/civilworks/nwp/2012/NWP2012_corrections_21-sep-2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
  79. Ward J V, Stanford J A (1995). Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation. Regul Rivers Res Manage, 11(1): 105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Webster J R, Benfield E F, Ehrman T P, Schaeffer M A, Tank J L, Hutchens J J, D’Angelo D J (1999). What happens to allochthonous materials that fall into streams: a synthesis of new and published information from Coweeta. Freshw Biol, 41(4): 687–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wipfli M S, Gregovich D P (2002). Export of invertebrates and detritus from fishless headwater streams in southeastern Alaska: implications for downstream salmonid production. Freshw Biol, 47(5): 957–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wipfli M S, Richardson J S, Naiman R J (2007). Ecological linkages between headwaters and downstream ecosystems: transport of organic matter, invertebrates, and wood down headwater channels. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 43(1): 72–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wohl E (2010). Mountain Rivers Revisited. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wohl E (2013). Migration of channel heads following wildfire in the Colorado Front Range, USA. Earth Surf Process Landf, 38(9): 1049–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wohl E (2014). Rivers in the Landscape: Science and Management. Chichester, UK: Wiley BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  86. Wohl E E, Pearthree P A (1991). Debris flows as geomorphic agents in the Huachuca Mountains of southeastern Arizona. Geomorphology, 4 (3-4): 273–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yetemen O, Istanbulluoglu E, Vivoni E R (2010). The implications of geology, soils, and vegetation on landscape morphology: inferences from semi-arid basins with complex vegetation patterns in central New Mexico, USA. Geomorphology, 116(3-4): 246–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeosciencesColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations