Using ground penetrating radar to assess the variability of snow water equivalent and melt in a mixed canopy forest, Northern Colorado
- 157 Downloads
Snow is an important environmental variable in headwater systems that controls hydrological processes such as streamflow, groundwater recharge, and evapotranspiration. These processes will be affected by both the amount of snow available for melt and the rate at which it melts. Snow water equivalent (SWE) and snowmelt are known to vary within complex subalpine terrain due to terrain and canopy influences. This study assesses this variability during the melt season using ground penetrating radar to survey multiple plots in northwestern Colorado near a snow telemetry (SNOTEL) station. The plots include south aspect and flat aspect slopes with open, coniferous (subalpine fir, Abies lasiocarpa and engelman spruce, Picea engelmanii), and deciduous (aspen, populous tremuooides) canopy cover. Results show the high variability for both SWE and loss of SWE during spring snowmelt in 2014. The coefficient of variation for SWE tended to increase with time during snowmelt whereas loss of SWE remained similar. Correlation lengths for SWE were between two and five meters with melt having correlation lengths between two and four meters. The SNOTEL station regularly measured higher SWE values relative to the survey plots but was able to reasonably capture the overall mean loss of SWE during melt. Ground Penetrating Radar methods can improve future investigations with the advantage of non-destructive sampling and the ability to estimate depth, density, and SWE.
Keywordsheadwaters snowmelt snow water equivalent ground penetrating rdar SNOTEL
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
I would like to acknowledge Dr. Dennis Harry at Colorado State University who allowed me to borrow the Ground Penetrating Radar equipment and taught the course in geophysical methods that allowed me to interpret this data. This study would not have been possible otherwise. I would also like to recognize the two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the analysis and writing of this paper from its original version.
- Andreadis K M, Storck P, Lettenmaier D P (2009). Modeling snow accumulation and ablation processes in forested environments. Water Resour Res, 45(5)Google Scholar
- Fassnacht S R, Hultstrand M (2015). Snowpack variability and trends at long-term stations in northern Colorado, USA. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, 92: 1–6Google Scholar
- Richer E E, Kampf S K, Fassnacht S R, Moore C C (2013). Spatiotemporal index for analyzing controls on snow climatology: application in the Colorado Front Range. Phys Geogr, 34(2): 85–107Google Scholar
- Singh K K, Datt P, Sharma V, Ganju A, Mishra V D, Parashar A, Chauhan R (2011). Snow depth and layer interface estimation using Ground Penetrating Radar. Curr Sci, 100(10): 1532–1539Google Scholar
- Staples J M, Adams E E, Slaughter A E, McKittrick L R (2006). Slope scale modeling of snow surface temperature in topographically complex terrain. In: Proceedings of 2006 International Snow Science Workshop: 806–814Google Scholar
- USGS (2015). 3DEP products and services: The national Map, 3D Elevation Program Web page. accessed (November, 2015), edited, http://nationalmap.gov/3dep_prodserv.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Webb R W, Fassnacht S R (2016). Snow density, snow depth, and soil moisture at Dry Lake study site in northern Colorado in 2014. Colorado State UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Webb R W, Fassnacht S R, Gooseff M N (2015). Wetting and drying variability of the shallow subsurface beneath a snowpack in California’s Southern Sierra Nevada. Vadose Zone J, 14(8): doi: 10.2136/vzj2014.12.0182Google Scholar