Frontiers of Earth Science

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 457–468 | Cite as

Hydroclimatological data and analyses from a headwaters region of Mongolia as boundary objects in interdisciplinary climate change research

Research Article
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

Collaborative work on increasingly complex hydroclimatic investigations often crosses disciplinary boundaries. Elements of scientific inquiry, such as data or the results of analyses can become objectified, or capable of being adopted and/or adapted by users from multiple disciplinary realms. These objects often provide a bridge for collaborative endeavors, or are used as tools by individuals pursuing multi-disciplinary work. Boundary object terminology was first formalized and applied by social scientists. However, few examples of the application of this useful framework are found in the hydrologic literature. The construct is applied here to identify and discuss how common research products and processes are used both internally and externally through providing examples from a project examining the historical and paleo proxy-based hydroclimatology of a headwaters region of Mongolia. The boundary object concept is valuable to consider when conducting and critiquing basic research, collaborating across multiple disciplinary teams as when studying climate change issues, as an individual researcher working in a cross boundary sense using methods from differing disciplines to answer questions, and/or when one group adapts the work of another to their own research problems or interpretive needs, as occurred with selected products of this project.

Keywords

Mongolia boundary objects climate change hydroclimate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr. Gelegpil Adyabadam and her colleagues from the Mongolian Research and Information Institute of Meteorology, Hydrology, and Environment for providing access to the Mongolian hydroclimate data used in the original analyses. Thanks are also extended to four anonymous reviewers and the associate editor, whose comments and suggestions facilitated substantial improvements to this document. Partial support for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems Program (Award BCS-1011801 entitled Does Community- Based Rangeland Ecosystem Management Increase Coupled Systems' Resilience to Climate Change in Mongolia?, PI Dr. Maria Fernandez-Gimenez) and by the American Center for Mongolian Studies US-Mongolia Field Research Fellowship Program.

References

  1. Akkerman S F, Bakker A (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Rev Educ Res, 81(2): 132–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaulieu C, Ouarda T, Seidou O (2007). A review of homogenization techniques for climate data and their applicability to precipitation series. Hydrological Sciences Journal-Journal des Sciences Hydrologiques, 52: 18–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker A, Finger P, Meyer-Christoffer A, Rudolf B, Schamm K, Schneider U, Ziese M (2013). A description of the global landsurface precipitation data products of the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre with sample applications including centennial (trend) analysis from 1901–present. Earth Syst Sci Data, 5(1): 71–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blades J J, Klos P Z, Kemp K B, Hall T E, Force J E, Morgan P, Tinkham W T (2016). Forest managers’ response to climate change science: evaluating the constructs of boundary objects and organizations. For Ecol Manage, 360: 376–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruegger R A, Jigjsuren O, Fernandez-Gimenez M E (2014). Herder observations of rangeland change in Mongolia: indicators, causes, and application to community-based management. Rangeland Ecol Manag, 67(2): 119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davi N K, Pederson N, Leland C, Nachin B, Suran B, Jacoby G C (2013). Is eastern Mongolia drying? A long-term perspective of a multidecadal trend. Water Resour Res, 49(1): 151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Easterling D R, Peterson T C, Karl T R (1996). On the development and use of homogenized climate datasets. J Clim, 9(6): 1429–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ensor L A, Robeson S M (2008). Statistical characteristics of daily precipitation: comparisons of gridded and point datasets. J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 47(9): 2468–2476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fassnacht S R, Sukh T, Fernandez-Gimenez M E, Batbuyan B, Venable N B H, Laituri M, Adyabadam G (2011). Local understanding of hydro-climatic changes in Mongolia. In: Proceedings of H02 Symposium Cold Region Hydrology in a Changing Climate. IAHS Publication, 346: 120–129Google Scholar
  10. Fernandez-Gimenez M (1993). The role of ecological perception in indigenous resource management: a case study from the Mongolian forest-steppe. Nomad People, 33: 31–46Google Scholar
  11. Fernandez-Gimenez M E (2000). The role of Mongolian nomadic pastoralists’ ecological knowledge in rangeland management. Ecol Appl, 10(5): 1318–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernandez-Gimenez M E, Angerer J P, Allegretti A M, Fassnacht S R, Byamba A, Chantsallkham J, Reid R S, Venable N B H (2015b). Integrating herder observations, meteorological data and remote sensing to understand climate change patterns and impacts across an eco-climatic gradient in Mongolia. In: Fernandez-Gimenez M E, Batkhishig B, Fassnacht S R, Wilson D, eds. Proceedings of Building Resilience of Mongolia’s Rangelands: A Transdisciplinary Conference. Nutag Action and Research Institute, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 228–234Google Scholar
  13. Fernandez-Gimenez M E, Batbuyan B (2004). Law and disorder: local implementation of Mongolia’s Land Law. Dev Change, 35(1): 141–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandez-Gimenez M E, Batkhishig B, Batbuyan B (2012). Crossboundary and cross-level dynamics increase vulnerability to severe winter disasters (dzud) in Mongolia. Glob Environ Change, 22(4): 836–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernandez-Gimenez M E, Batkhishig B, Batbuyan B, Ulambayar T (2015a). Lessons from the dzud: community-based rangeland management increases the adaptive capacity of Mongolian herders to winter disasters. World Dev, 68: 48–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fritts H C (2001). Tree Rings and Climate. Caldwell: Blackburn Press, 1–567Google Scholar
  17. Gilbert R O (1987). Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1–320Google Scholar
  18. Green D, Raygorodetsky G (2010). Indigenous knowledge of a changing climate. Clim Change, 100(2): 239–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris I, Jones P D, Osborn T J, Lister D H (2014). Updated highresolution grids of monthly climatic observations–the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int J Climatol, 34(3): 623–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Helsel D R, Hirsch R M (2002). Statistical methods in water resources. In: Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the United States Geological Survey, Book 4, Hydrologic Analysis and Interpretation, Chapter A3. http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/twri/twri4a3/. Accessed 2014-11-02Google Scholar
  21. Jigjisuren O, Baival B, Nayanaa K, Jargalsaikhan A, Dash K, Badamkhand B, Bud A (2015). Evaluating the impact of climate change based on herder’s observations and comparing it with hydroclimatic and remote sensing data. In: Fernandez-Gimenez ME, Batkhishig B, Fassnacht S R, and Wilson D, eds. Proceedings of Building Resilience of Mongolia’s Rangelands: A Transdisciplinary Conference held June 9–10, 2015. Nutag Action and Research Institute, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 235–243Google Scholar
  22. Kendall M G, Gibbons J D (1990). Rank Correlation Methods (5th ed). London: Edward Arnold, Hodder and StoughtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Kimble C, Grenier C, Goglio-Primard K (2010). Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: political interplay between boundary objects and brokers. Int J Inf Manage, 30(5): 437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klein J T (1996). Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. University of Virginia Press, 300 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Laituri M J, Linn S, Fassnacht S R, Venable N B H, Jamiyansharav K, Ulambayar T, Allegretti A M, Reid R S, Fernandez-Gimenez M E (2015). The MOR2 Database: building integrated datasets for socialecological analysis across cultures and disciplines. In: Fernandez-Gimenez M E, Batkhishig B, Fassnacht S R, Wilson D, eds. Proceedings of Building Resilience of Mongolia’s Rangelands: A Transdisciplinary Conference held June 9–10, 2015. Nutag Action and Research Institute, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 209–215Google Scholar
  26. Leland C, Pederson N, Hessl A, Nachin B, Davi N, D’Arrigo R, Jacoby G (2013). A hydroclimatic regionalization of central Mongolia as inferred from tree rings. Dendrochronologia, 31(3): 205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lkhagvadorj D, Hauck M, Dulamsuren C H, Tsogtbaatar J (2013). Pastoral nomadism in the forest-steppe of the Mongolian Altai under a changing economy and warming climate. J Arid Environ, 88: 82–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loaiciga H A, Haston L, Michaelsen J (1993). Dendrohydrology and long-term hydrologic phenomena. Rev Geophys, 31(2): 151–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lynch A H, Tryhorn L, Abramson R (2008). Working at the boundary-Facilitating interdisciplinarity in climate change adaptation research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 89(2): 169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mann H B (1945). Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica, 13 (3): 245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marin A (2010). Riders under storms: contributions of nomadic herder’s observations to analyzing climate change in Mongolia. Glob Environ Change, 20(1): 162–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McGreavy B, Hutchins K, Smith H, Lindenfeld L, Silka L (2013). Addressing the complexities of boundary work in sustainability science through communication. Sustainability, 5(10): 4195–4221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meko D M, Woodhouse C A (2007). Chapter 8: Application of streamflow reconstruction to water resources management. In: Hughes M K, Swetnam T W, Diaz H F, eds. Dendroclimatology. Developments in Paleoenvironmental Research Volume 11, New York: Springer, 231–261Google Scholar
  34. Mitchell T D, Jones P D (2005). An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated highresolution grids. Int J Climatol, 25(6): 693–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. National Statistical Office of Mongolia (2015). Mongolia Livestock Statistical Data. National Statistical Office of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, MongoliaGoogle Scholar
  36. Parker J, Crona B (2012). On being all things to all people: boundary organizations and the contemporary research university. Soc Stud Sci, 42(2): 262–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pederson N, Leland C, Nachin B, Hessl A E, Bell A R, Martin-Benito D, Saladyga T, Suran B, Brown P M, Davi N K (2013). Three centuries of shifting hydroclimatic regimes across the Mongolian Breadbasket. Agric Meteorol, 178: 10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Regdel D, Dugarzhav C, Gunin P D (2012). Ecological demands on socioeconomic development of Mongolia under climate aridization. Arid Ecosystems, 2(1): 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rhoten D, Parker A (2004). Education: risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science, 306(5704): 2046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rockstrom J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin F S III, Lambin E F, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber H J, Nykvist B, de Wit C A, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sorlen S, Snyder P K, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell R W, Fabry V J, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J A (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461 (7263): 472–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sen P K (1968). Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc, 63(324): 1379–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Star S L (2010). This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci Technol Human Values, 35(5): 601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Star S L, Griesemer J R (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Soc Stud Sci, 19(3): 387–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sternlieb F, Bixler R P, Huber-Stearns H, Huayhuaca C (2013). A question of fit: reflections on boundaries, organizations, and socialecological systems. J Environ Manage, 130: 117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stockton C W (1971). The feasibility of augmenting hydrologic records using tree-ring data. Unpublished PhD Dissertation for PhD degree. The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA, 185 ppGoogle Scholar
  46. Sukh T (2012). Local understanding of hydro-climate changes in Mongolia. Unpublished MS Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USAGoogle Scholar
  47. Sundberg M (2007). Parameterizations as boundary objects on the climate arena. Soc Stud Sci, 37(3): 473–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thiel H (1950). A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis, I, II, III. In: Proceedings of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences 53, 386–392, 521–525, 1397–1412Google Scholar
  49. van Pelt S C, Haasnoot M, Arts B, Ludwig F, Swart R, Biesbroek R (2015). Communicating climate (change) uncertainties: simulation games as boundary objects. Environ Sci Policy, 45: 41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Venable N B H (2016). Trends and Tree-Rings: An Investigation of the Historical and Paleo Proxy Hydroclimate Record of the Khangai Mountain Region of Mongolia. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USAGoogle Scholar
  51. Venable N B H, Fassnacht S R (2013). Reconstructing a water balance for North Crestone Creek: streamflow variability and extremes in a snowmelt-dominated internal drainage basin. Colorado Water: Newsletter of the Water Center of Colorado State University, 30(5): 10–14Google Scholar
  52. Venable N B H, Fassnacht S R (2015). Climate change assessment issues and implications for hydro-ecology in Mongolia. In: Building Resilience of Mongolia's Rangelands: A Transdisciplinary Conference, Ulaanbataar, Mongolia, June 9, 2015Google Scholar
  53. Venable N B H, Fassnacht S R, Adyabadam G (2014). To grid or not to grid… Precipitation data and hydrological modeling in the Khangai Mountain region of Mongolia. 2014 American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA, December 15–19, 2014Google Scholar
  54. Venable N B H, Fassnacht S R, Adyabadam G, Tumenjargal S, Fernandez-Gimenez M, Batbuyan B (2012). Does the length of station record influence the warming trend that is perceived by Mongolian herders near the Khangai Mountains? Pirineos, 167(0): 69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Venable N B H, Fassnacht S R, Hendricks A S (2015). Spatial changes in climate across Mongolia. In: Fernandez-Gimenez ME, Batkhishig B, Fassnacht S R, Wilson D, eds. Proceedings of Building Resilience of Mongolia’s Rangelands: A Transdisciplinary Conference held June 9–10, 2015. Nutag Action and Research Institute, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 73–77Google Scholar
  56. Whetton P, Hennessy K, Clarke J, McInnes K, Kent D (2012). Use of representative climate futures in impact and adaptation assessment. Clim Change, 115(3–4): 433–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Willmott C J, Robeson S M (1995). Climatologically aided interpolation (CAI) of terrestrial air temperature. Int J Climatol, 15(2): 221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Willmott C J, Rowe C M, Philpot W D (1985). Small-scale climate maps: a sensitivity analysis of some common assumptions associated with grid-point interpolation and contouring. Am Cartogr, 12(1): 5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wolf J M, Venable N B H (2015). Earlywood, latewood, and adjusted latewood correlations to precipitation: a test case from the Khangai Mountains of Mongolia. In: Fernandez-Gimenez M E, Batkhishig B, Fassnacht S R, Wilson D, eds Proceedings of Building Resilience of Mongolia's Rangelands: A Transdisciplinary Conference held June 9–10, 2015. Nutag Action and Research Institute, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 87–93Google Scholar
  60. Wyborn C (2015). Connectivity conservation: boundary objects, science narratives and the co-production of science and practice. Environ Sci Policy, 51: 292–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yu F, Price K P, Ellis J, Shi P (2003). Response of seasonal vegetation development to climatic variations in eastern central Asia. Remote Sens Environ, 87(1): 42–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Haywood A, Ellis M (2011). The Anthropocene: a new epoch of geological time? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, 369: 835–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESS-Watershed ScienceColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations