Skip to main content
Log in

Spatio-temporal snowmelt variability across the headwaters of the Southern Rocky Mountains

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Earth Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the rate of snowmelt helps inform how water stored as snow will transform into streamflow. Data from 87 snow telemetry (SNOTEL) stations across the Southern Rocky Mountains were used to estimate spatio-temporal melt factors. Decreases in snow water equivalent were correlated to temperature at these monitoring stations for eight half-month periods from early March through late June. Time explained 70% of the variance in the computed snow melt factors. A residual linear correlation model was used to explain subsequent spatial variability. Longitude, slope, and land cover type explained further variance. For evergreen trees, canopy density was relevant to find enhanced melt rates; while for all other land cover types, denoted as non-evergreen, lower melt rates were found at high elevation, high latitude and north facing slopes, denoting that in cold environments melting is less effective than in milder sites. A change in the temperature sensor about mid-way through the time series (1990 to 2013) created a discontinuity in the temperature dataset. An adjustment to the time series yield larger computed melt factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson E A (2006). Snow Accumulation and Ablation Model–SNOW-17. Update of technical memorandum NWS HYDRO-17 (National weather service river forecast system–snow accumulation and ablation model), Silver Springs, MD, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, 44pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Avanzi F, De Michele C, Ghezzi A, Jommi C, Pepe M (2014). A processing-modeling routine to use SNOTEL hourly data in snowpack dynamic models. Adv Water Resour, 73: 16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker K, Rango A, Kustas W (1996). Incorporating radiation inputs into the snowmelt runoff model. Hydrol Processes, 10(10): 1329–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colbeck S (1979). Water-flow through heterogeneous snow. Cold Reg Sci Technol, 1(1): 37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley K, Palmer P (1997). Characteristics of snowmelt from NRCS SNOTEL (SNOwTELemetry) sites. Proceedings of the 65th Annual Western Snow Conference, Banff, Alberta, 11pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly S F, Davis R E, Ochs E, Pangburn T (2000). An approach to spatially distributed snow modeling of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins, California. Hydrol Processes, 14(18): 3257–3271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWalle D, Henderson Z, Rango A (2002). Spatial and temporal variations in snowmelt degree-day factors computed from SNOTEL data in the Upper Rio Grande basin. Proceedings of the 70th Western Snow Conference, Granby, CO, 73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Doesken N J, Judson A (1996). The Snow Booklet. A guide to the science, climatology and measurement of snow in the United States. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado USA, 84 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler K A, Leavesley G H, Bales R C, Fassnacht S R (2006). Evaluation of gridded snow water equivalent and satellite snow cover products for mountain basins in a hydrologic model. Hydrol Processes, 20(4): 673–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne T, Price A, Colbeck S (1976). Generation of runoff from subarctic snowpacks. Water Resour Res, 12(4): 677–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassnacht S R, Deitemeyer D C, Venable N B H (2014). Capitalizing on the daily time step of snow telemetry data to model the snowmelt components of the hydrograph for small watersheds. Hydrol Processes, 28(16): 4654–4668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassnacht S R, Dressler K A, Hultstrand D M, Bales R C, Patterson G G (2012). Temporal inconsistencies in coarse-scale snow water equivalent patterns: Colorado River Basin snow telemetry-topography regressions. Pirineos, 167: 165–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassnacht S R, LĂłpez-Moreno J I, Toro M, Hultstrand D M (2013). Mapping snow cover and snow depth across the lake limnopolar watershed on Byers Peninsula (Livingston Island) in maritime Antarctica. Antarct Sci, 25(2): 157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassnacht S R, Records R M (2015). Large snowmelt versus rainfall events in the mountains. J Geophys Res, 120: 2375–2381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassnacht S R, Sexstone G A, Kashipazha A H, LĂłpez-Moreno J I, Jasinski M F, Kampf S K, Von Thaden B C (2016). Deriving snowcover depletion curves for different spatial scales from remote sensing and snow telemetry data. Hydrol Processes, 30(11): 1708–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He M, Hogue T S, Franz K J, Margulis S A, Vrugt J A (2011). Characterizing parameter sensitivity and uncertainty for a snow model across hydroclimatic regimes. Adv Water Resour, 34(1): 114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hock R (2003). Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas. J Hydrol (Amst), 282(1–4): 104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton R E (1915). The melting of snow. Mon Weather Rev, 43(12): 599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson J, Marks D (2004). The detection and correction of snow water equivalent pressure sensor errors. Hydrol Processes, 18(18): 3513–3525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson J B, Schaefer G L (2002). The influence of thermal, hydrologic, and snow deformation mechanisms on snow water equivalent pressure sensor accuracy. Hydrol Processes, 16(18): 3529–3542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julander R P, Curtis J, Beard A (2007). The SNOTEL Temperature Dataset. Mountain Views Newsletter, 1(2): 4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampf S K, Richer E E (2014). Estimating source regions for snowmelt runoff in a Rocky Mountain basin: tests of a data-based conceptual modeling approach. Hydrol Processes, 28(4): 2237–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Marks D, Dozier J, Reba M, Winstral A (2013). Evaluation of distributed hydrologic impacts of temperature-index and energybased snow models. Adv Water Resour, 56: 77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavesley G H (1989). Problems of snowmelt runoff modelling for a variety of physiographic and climatic conditions. Hydrological Sciences, 34(6): 617–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legates D R, McCabe G J Jr (1999). Evaluating the use of “goodness-offit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res, 35(1): 233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linsley R K Jr (1943). A simple procedure for the day-to-day forecasting of runoff from snow-melt. Eos (Wash DC), 24(3): 62–67

    Google Scholar 

  • LĂłpez-Moreno J I, Alvera B, Latron J, Fassnacht S R (2010). InstalaciĂłn y Uso de un ColchĂłn de Nieve para la MonitorizaciĂłn del Manto de Nieve, Cuenca Experimental de Izas (Pirineo Central). Cuadernos de InvestigaciĂłn Geográfica, 36(1): 73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydon J, Schulz M (1986). Round. Track 4 on Album, Elektra, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma C, Fassnacht S R, Kampf S K (2016). Homogenization of High Elevation Temperature Data Across Colorado. Oral presentation at the 36th Annual AGU Hydrology Days Conference, Fort Collins, Colorado, March 21–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinec J, Rango A, Roberts R (2008). Snowmelt Runoff Model User’s Manual, Updated Edition 2008, WinSRM Version 1.11. New Mexico State University Agricultural Experiment Station, Special Report 100

    Google Scholar 

  • Menne M J, Williams C N Jr, Vose R S (2015). United States Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) Daily Dataset. National Climatic Data Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, available at: <http://cdiac.ornl.gov/epubs/ndp/ushcn/ushcn.html> (last access: 13 November 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meromy L, Molotch N P, Link T E, Fassnacht S R, Rice R (2013). Subgrid variability of snow water equivalent at operational snow stations in the western USA. Hydrol Processes, 27(17): 2383–2400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrisey P (2015). Personal Communication. Idaho Snow Survey Office, Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash J E, Sutcliffe J V (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. J Hydrol (Amst), 10(3): 282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (2016a). Snow Telemetry (SNOTEL) Data Collection Network Brochure. National Water and Climate Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, available at: http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/snotel/snotel_brochure.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (2016b). NRCS: National Water and Climate Center SNOTEL data network. U.S. Department of Agriculture, available at:<ww.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/snow/>, (last accessed: 16 December 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmura A (2001). Physical basis for the temperature-based melt-index method. J Appl Meteorol, 40(4): 753–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omani N, Srinivasan R, Smith P K, Karthikeyan R (2016). Glacier mass balance simulation using SWAT distributed snow algorithm. Hydrol Sci J

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyler J, Dobrowski S Z, Ballantyne A P, Klene A E, Running S W (2015). Artificial amplification of warming trends across the mountains of the Western United States. Geophys Res Lett, 42(1): 153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson G G (2016). Seasonal Snowpack Trends about Rocky Mountain National Park. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Watershed Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado USA, 105pp + 1 appendix

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke R A Sr, Stohlgren T, Schell L, Parton W, Doesken N, Redmond K, Moeny J, McKee T, Kittel T G F (2002). Problems in evaluating regional and local trends in temperature: an example from eastern Colorado, USA. Int J Climatol, 22(4): 421–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rango A, Martinec J (1995). Revisiting the degree-day method for snowmelt computations. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 31(4): 657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richer E E, Kampf S K, Fassnacht S R, Moore C (2013). Spatiotemporal index for analyzing controls on snow climatology: application in the Colorado Front Range. Phys Geogr, 34: 85–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexstone G A, Fassnacht S R (2014). What drives basin scale spatial variability of snowpack properties in Northern Colorado? Cryo-sphere, 8(2): 329–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin C, Schaefli B, Nicotina L, Simoni S, Barrenetxea G, Smith R, Parlange M, Rinaldo A (2013). Improving the degree-day method for sub-daily melt simulations with physically-based diurnal variations. Adv Water Resour, 55: 149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1956). Snow Hydrology. Summary report of the snow investigation, North Pacific Division, Portland, OR, 437pp

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2016). The USGS Land Cover Institute (LCI). U.S. Department of the Interior, available at:<landcover.usgs.gov>

    Google Scholar 

  • ValĂ©ry A, AndrĂ©assian V, Perrin C (2014). As simple as possible but not simpler: what is useful in a temperature-based snow-accounting routine? Part 2- Sensitivity analysis of the Cemaneige snow accounting routine on 380 catchments. Journal of Hydrology, 517: 1176–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb R W, Fassnacht S R, Gooseff M N (in review). Defining the Diurnal Pattern of Snowmelt using a Gamma Distribution Function. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, (JAWRA-16-0153-P) (submitted July 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeinivand H, De Smedt F (2009). Hydrological modeling of snow accumulation and melting on river basin scale. Water Resources Management, 23(11): 2271–2287

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to the Colorado State Snow Survey office provided the GPS coordinates for the SNOTEL stations. Some of Fassnacht’s time was supported by the NASATerrestrial Hydrology Program (grant #NNX11AQ66G, Principal Investigator M. F. Jasinski, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center). Additional support was provided by the Colorado Water Conservation Board project entitled “Evaluating the Time Series Discontinuity of the NRCS Snow Telemetry (SNOTEL) Temperature Data across Colorado.” Weber was supported by the Honors program at CSU. The authors thank CSU Professor John D. Stednick for his input with this document. Thanks are also due to Karen Burke for her discussions early in this work. We also thank two anonymous reviewers who provided insightful comments that helped reshape this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. R. Fassnacht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fassnacht, S.R., López-Moreno, J.I., Ma, C. et al. Spatio-temporal snowmelt variability across the headwaters of the Southern Rocky Mountains. Front. Earth Sci. 11, 505–514 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-017-0641-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-017-0641-4

Keywords

Navigation