Advertisement

Frontiers of Earth Science

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 72–85 | Cite as

Embodied water analysis for Hebei Province, China by input-output modelling

Research Article

Abstract

With the accelerating coordinated development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, regional economic integration is recognized as a national strategy. As water scarcity places Hebei Province in a dilemma, it is of critical importance for Hebei Province to balance water resources as well as make full use of its unique advantages in the transition to sustainable development. To our knowledge, related embodied water accounting analysis has been conducted for Beijing and Tianjin, while similar works with the focus on Hebei are not found. In this paper, using the most complete and recent statistics available for Hebei Province, the embodied water use in Hebei Province is analyzed in detail. Based on input-output analysis, it presents a complete set of systems accounting framework for water resources. In addition, a database of embodied water intensity is proposed which is applicable to both intermediate inputs and final demand. The result suggests that the total amount of embodied water in final demand is 10.62 billion m3, of which the water embodied in urban household consumption accounts for more than half. As a net embodied water importer, the water embodied in the commodity trade in Hebei Province is 17.20 billion m3. The outcome of this work implies that it is particularly urgent to adjust industrial structure and trade policies for water conservation, to upgrade technology and to improve water utilization. As a result, to relieve water shortages in Hebei Province, it is of crucial importance to regulate the balance of water use within the province, thus balancing water distribution in the various industrial sectors.

Keywords

input-output analysis Hebei Province embodied water embodied water intensity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51505411), the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2013CB430402), and Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant No. 20120001110077).

References

  1. Allan J A (1996). Policy responses to the closure of water resources. In: Howsam P, Carter R, eds. Water Policy: Allocation and Management in Practice. London: Chapman and HallGoogle Scholar
  2. CCSY (2008). China City Statistical Yearbook (2007). Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. Chapagain A K, Hoekstra A Y (2011). The blue, green and grey water footprint of rice from production and consumption perspectives. Ecol Econ, 70(4): 749–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen B, Chen G Q (2007a). Resource analysis of the Chinese society 1980—2002 based on exergy—Part 4: fishery and rangeland. Energy Policy, 35(4): 2079–2086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen G Q, Chen B (2007b). Resource analysis of the Chinese society 1980—2002 based on energy—Part 5: resource structure and intensity. Energy Policy, 35(4): 2087–2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen G Q, Shao L, Chen Z M, Li Z, Zhang B, ChenH, Wu Z (2011). Low-carbon assessment for ecological wastewater treatment by a constructed wetland in Beijing. Ecol Eng, 37(4): 622–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen G Q, Chen Z M (2010). Carbon emissions and resources use by Chinese economy 2007: a 135-sector inventory and input–output embodiment. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 15(11): 3647–3732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen G Q, Chen Z M (2011a). Greenhouse gas emissions and natural resources use by the world economy: ecological input–output modeling. Ecol Modell, 222(14): 2362–2376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen G Q, Guo S, Shao L, Li J S, Chen Z M (2013). Three-scale inputoutput modeling for urban economy: carbon emission by Beijing 2007. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 18(9): 2493–2506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen G Q, Han M Y (2015a). Global supply chain of arable land use: production-based and consumption-based trade imbalance. Land Use Policy, 49: 118–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen G Q, Han M Y (2015b). Virtual land use change in China 2002–2010: internal transition and trade imbalance. Land Use Policy, 47: 55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen G Q, Li J S (2015). Virtual water assessment for Macao, China: highlighting the role of external trade. J Clean Prod, 93: 308–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen Z M, Chen G Q (2011b). Embodied carbon dioxide emission at supra-national scale: a coalition analysis for G7, BRIC, and the rest of the world. Energy Policy, 39(5): 2899–2909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen ZM, Chen G Q (2013). Virtual water accounting for the globalized world economy: national water footprint and international virtual water trade. Ecol Indic, 28(5): 142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen Z M, Chen G Q, Xia X H, Xu S Y (2012). Global network of embodied water flow by systems input-output simulation. Front Earth Sci 6(3): 331–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Han M, Guo S, Chen H, Ji X, Li J (2014a). Local-scale systems inputoutput analysis of embodied water for the Beijing economy in 2007. Front Earth Sci 8(3): 414–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Han M Y, Chen G Q, Meng J, Wu X D, Alsaedi A, Ahmad B (2016). Virtual water accounting for a building construction engineering project with nine sub-projects: a case in E-town, Beijing. J Clean Prod, 112(Part 5): 4691–4700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Han M Y, Chen G Q, Mustafa M T, Hayat T, Shao L, Li J S, Xia X H, Ji X (2015). Embodied water for urban economy: a three-scale input–output analysis for Beijing 2010. Ecol Modell, 318: 19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Han M Y, Sui X, Huang Z L, Wu X D, Xia X H, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2014b). Bibliometric indicators for sustainable hydropower development. Ecol Indic, 47: 231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoekstra A Y (2003). Virtual water trade: proceedings of the international expert meeting on virtual water trade. Value of water research report series, No. 12. Delft: IHEGoogle Scholar
  21. HSY (2008). Hebei Statistical Yearbook 2007. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Klaassen L H (1973). Economic and social projects with environmental repercussions: a shadow project approach. Reg Urban Econ, 3(1): 83–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar M D, Singh O P (2005). Virtual water in global food and water policy making: Is there a need for rethinking? Water Resour Manage, 19(6): 759–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lambooy T (2011). Corporate social responsibility: sustainable water use. J Clean Prod, 19(8): 852–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leontief W W (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. Rev Econ Stat, 18(3): 105–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li X, Feng K, Siu Y L, Hubacek K (2012). Energy-water nexus of wind power in China: the balancing act between CO2 emissions and water consumption. Energy Policy, 45(11): 440–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ma J, Hoekstra A Y, Wang H, Chapagain A K, Wang D (2006). Virtual versus real water transfers within China. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 361(1469): 835–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mekonnen M M, Hoekstra A Y (2010). A global and high-resolution assessment of the green, blue and grey water footprint of wheat. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 14(7): 1259–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mekonnen M M, Hoekstra A Y (2011). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 15(5): 1577–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mekonnen M M, Hoekstra A Y (2012). The blue water footprint of electricity from hydropower. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 16(1): 179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Odum H T (1971). Environment, Power and Society. New York: Wiley-InterscienceGoogle Scholar
  32. Odum H T (1996). Environmental Accouting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making. New York: Wiley-InterscienceGoogle Scholar
  33. Odum H T, Brown M T, Brandt-Williams S (2000a). Handbook of emergy evaluation: a compendium of data for emergy computation issued in a series of folios; Folio #1 Introduction and global budget. University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  34. Odum H T, Brown M T, Brandt-Williams S (2000b). Handbook of emergy evaluation: a compendium of data for emergy computation issued in a series of folios; Folio #2 Emergy of Global Processes. University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  35. Odum H T, Odum B (2003). Concepts and methods of ecological engineering. Ecol Eng, 20(5): 339–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pang M, Zhang L, Ulgiati S, Wang C (2015). Ecological impacts of small hydropower in China: insights from an emergy analysis of a case plant. Energy Policy, 76: 112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shao L, Chen G Q (2013). Water footprint assessment for wastewater treatment: method, indicator, and application. Environ Sci Technol, 47(14): 7787–7794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shao L, Chen G Q, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2014). Systems ecological accounting for wastewater treatment engineering: method, indicator and application. Ecol Indic, 47: 32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shao L, Wu Z, Zeng L, Chen ZM, Zhou Y, Chen G Q (2013). Embodied energy assessment for ecological wastewater treatment by a constructed wetland. Ecol Modell, 252: 63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stelling G S, Duinmeijer S P A (2003). A staggered conservative scheme for every Froude number in rapidly varied shallow water flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids, 43(12): 1329–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang C, Zhang L, Chang Y, Pang M (2015a). Biomass direct-fired power generation system in China: an integrated energy, GHG emissions, and economic evaluation for Salix. Energy Policy, 84: 155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang P, Chen G Q (2015). Environmental dispersion in a tidal wetland with sorption by vegetation. Communications in Nonlinear Science & Numerical Simulation, 22(s 1–3): 348–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang P, Chen G Q (2016). Transverse concentration distribution in Taylor dispersion: Gill’s method of series expansion supported by concentration moments. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 95: 131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang P, Li Z, Wu X, An Y (2015b). Taylor dispersion in a packed pipe with wall reaction: based on the method of Gill’s series solution. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 91: 89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang Y, Li W, Wang Y, Fu J (2015c). Integrate actions for water resources protection in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. China Water Resources, (1): 1–37Google Scholar
  46. Wei WD, Wu X D, Wu X F, Xi QM, Ji X, Li G P (2016). Regional study on investment for transmission infrastructure in China based on the State Grid data. Front Earth Sci., doi: 10.1007/s11707-016-0581-4Google Scholar
  47. Wichelns D (2001). The role of ‘virtual water’ in efforts to achieve food security and other national goals, with an example from Egypt. Agric Water Manage, 49(2): 131–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Winnie G L, Hoekstra A Y, Meer T H Van Der (2009). The water footprint of bioenergy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(25): 10219–10223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu X D, Xia X H, Chen G Q, Wu X F, Chen B (2016a). Embodied energy analysis for coal-based power generation system-highlighting the role of indirect energy cost. Appl Energy, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.027Google Scholar
  50. Wu X D, Yang Q, Chen G Q, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2016b). Progress and prospect of CCS in China: using learning curve to assess the costviability of a 2-600 MW retrofitted oxyfuel power plant as a case study. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 60: 1274–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu X F, Chen G Q, Wu X D, Yang Q, Alsaedi A, Hayat T, Ahmad B (2015). Renewability and sustainability of biogas system: cosmic exergy based assessment for a case in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 51: 1509–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wu X F, Wu X D, Li J S, Xia X H, Mi T, Yang Q, Chen G Q, Chen B, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2014). Ecological accounting for an integrated “pig–biogas–fish” system based on emergetic indicators. Ecol Indic, 47: 189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xia X H, Hu Y, Chen G Q, Alsaedi A, Hayat T, Wu X D (2015). Vertical specialization, global trade and energy consumption for an urban economy: a value added export perspective for Beijing. Ecol Modell, 318: 49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang B, Chen G Q (2010). Physical sustainability assessment for the China society: exergy-based systems account for resources use and environmental emissions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 14(6): 1527–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang B, Chen Z M, Zeng L, Qiao H, Chen B (2015). Demand-driven water withdrawals by Chinese industry: a multi-regional input-output analysis. Front Earth Sci, 10(1): 1–16Google Scholar
  56. Zhang B, Li J S, Peng B H (2014a). Multi-regional input-output analysis for China’s regional CH4 emissions. Front Earth Sci, 8(1): 163–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang L, Hu Q, Zhang F (2014b). Input-output modeling for urban energy consumption in Beijing: dynamics and comparison. PLoS ONE, 9(3): e89850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang L X, Wang C B, Bahaj A S (2014c). Carbon emissions by rural energy in China. Renew Energy, 66(3): 641–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang Z Y, Yang H, Shi M J, Zehnder A J B, Abbaspour K C (2011). Analyses of impacts of China’s international trade on its water resources and uses. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 15(9): 2871–2880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhou S Y, Chen H, Li S C (2010). Resources use and greenhouse gas emissions in urban economy: ecological input-output modeling for Beijing 2002. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 15(10): 3201–3231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Heavy Machinery Fluid Power Transmission and ControlYanshan UniversityQinhuangdaoChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Advanced Forging & Stamping Technology and Science, Ministry of Education of ChinaYanshan UniversityQinhuangdaoChina
  3. 3.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.College of EngineeringPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  5. 5.School of EconomicsRenmin University of ChinaBeijingChina
  6. 6.School of EconomicsPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations