Skip to main content
Log in

A novel honeycomb cell assay kit designed for evaluating horizontal cell migration in response to functionalized self-assembling peptide hydrogels

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A clear understanding on cell migration behaviors contributes to designing novel biomaterials in tissue engineering and elucidating related tissue regeneration processes. Many traditional evaluation methods on cell migration including scratch assay and transwell migration assay possess all kinds of limitations. In this study, a novel honeycomb cell assay kit was designed and made of photosensitive resin by 3D printing. This kit has seven hexagonal culture chambers so that it can evaluate the horizontal cell migration behavior in response to six surrounding environments simultaneously, eliminating the effect of gravity on cells. Here this cell assay kit was successfully applied to evaluate endothelial cell migration cultured on self-assembling peptide (SAP) RADA (AcN-RADARADARADARADA-CONH2) nanofiber hydrogel toward different functionalized SAP hydrogels. Our results indicated that the functionalized RADA hydrogels with different concentration of bioactive motifs of KLT or PRG could induce cell migration in a dose-dependent manner. The total number and migration distance of endothelial cells on functionalized SAP hydrogels significantly increased with increasing concentration of bioactive motif PRG or KLT. Therefore, the honeycomb cell assay kit provides a simple, efficient and convenient tool to investigate cell migration behavior in response to multi-environments simultaneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lauffenburger D A, Horwitz A F. Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell, 1996, 84(3): 359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reig G, Pulgar E, ConchaML. Cell migration: from tissue culture to embryos. Development, 2014, 141(10): 1999–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Nieuwenhuysen T, Vleminckx K. Cell migration during development. eLS, 2014, doi: 10.1002/9780470015902. a0020864.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw T J, Martin P. Wound repair at a glance. Journal of Cell Science, 2009, 122(18): 3209–3213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gurtner G C, Werner S, Barrandon Y, et al. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature, 2008, 453(7193): 314–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamaguchi H, Wyckoff J, Condeelis J. Cell migration in tumors. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2005, 17(5): 559–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hollister S J. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nature Materials, 2005, 4(7): 518–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffith L G, Naughton G. Tissue engineering — current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science, 2002, 295 (5557): 1009–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Petrie R J, Doyle A D, Yamada K M. Random versus directionally persistent cell migration. Nature Reviews: Molecular Cell Biology, 2009, 10(8): 538–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pankov R, Endo Y, Even-Ram S, et al. A Rac switch regulates random versus directionally persistent cell migration. The Journal of Cell Biology, 2005, 170(5): 793–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haeger A, Wolf K, Zegers M M, et al. Collective cell migration: guidance principles and hierarchies. Trends in Cell Biology, 2015, 25(9): 556–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rørth P. Whence directionality: guidance mechanisms in solitary and collective cell migration. Developmental Cell, 2011, 20(1): 9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lutolf M P, Hubbell J A. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nature Biotechnology, 2005, 23(1): 47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kramer N, Walzl A, Unger C, et al. In vitro cell migration and invasion assays. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, 2013, 752(1): 10–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hulkower K I, Herber R L. Cell migration and invasion assays as tools for drug discovery. Pharmaceutics, 2011, 3(1): 107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lei K F, Tseng H P, Lee C Y, et al. Quantitative study of cell invasion process under extracellular stimulation of cytokine in a microfluidic device. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 25557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meng Q, Yao S, Wang X, et al. RADA16: A self-assembly peptide hydrogel for the application in tissue regeneration. Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, 2014, 4(12): 1019–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu X, Wang X, Wang X, et al. Functionalized self-assembling peptide nanofiber hydrogels mimic stem cell niche to control human adipose stem cell behavior in vitro. Acta Biomaterialia, 2013, 9(6): 6798–6805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang X, Qiao L, Horii A. Screening of functionalized selfassembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds with angiogenic activity for endothelial cell growth. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, 2011, 21(2): 111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang X, Horii A, Zhang S. Designer functionalized selfassembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds for growth, migration, and tubulogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Soft Matter, 2008, 4(12): 2388–2395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu X, Wang X, Horii A, et al. In vivo studies on angiogenic activity of two designer self-assembling peptide scaffold hydrogels in the chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane. Nanoscale, 2012, 4(8): 2720–2727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D’Andrea L D, Iaccarino G, Fattorusso R, et al. Targeting angiogenesis: structural characterization and biological properties of a de novo engineered VEGF mimicking peptide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(40): 14215–14220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kouvroukoglou S, Dee K C, Bizios R, et al. Endothelial cell migration on surfaces modified with immobilized adhesive peptides. Biomaterials, 2000, 21(17): 1725–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aguzzi M S, Giampietri C, De Marchis F, et al. RGDS peptide induces caspase 8 and caspase 9 activation in human endothelial cells. Blood, 2004, 103(11): 4180–4187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Form D M, Pratt B M, Madri J A. Endothelial cell proliferation during angiogenesis. In vitro modulation by basement membrane components. Laboratory Investigation, 1986, 55(5): 521–530

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51572144 and 21371106) and the Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (Grant No. 20161080091).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiumei Wang.

Additional information

F.G. and J.L. contributed equally to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guan, F., Lu, J. & Wang, X. A novel honeycomb cell assay kit designed for evaluating horizontal cell migration in response to functionalized self-assembling peptide hydrogels. Front. Mater. Sci. 11, 13–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-017-0369-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-017-0369-9

Keywords

Navigation