Upgrading of derived pyrolysis vapors for the production of biofuels from corncobs
A bubbling fluidized bed pyrolyzer was integrated with an in-situ honeycomb as a catalytic upgrading zone for the conversion of biomass to liquid fuels. In the upgrading zone, zeolite coated ceramic honeycomb (ZCCH) catalysts consisting of ZSM-5 (Si/Al = 25) were stacked and N2 or recycled non-condensable gas was used as a carrier gas. Ground corncob particles were fast pyrolyzed in the bubbling bed using fine sand particles as a heat carrier and the resulting pyrolysis vapors were passed on-line over the catalytic upgrading zone. The influence of carrier gas, temperature, and weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of catalyst on the oil product properties, distribution and mass balance were studied. Using ZCCH effectively increased the hydrocarbon yield and the heating value of the dry oil, especially in the presence of the recycled noncondensable gas. Even a low usage of zeolite catalyst at WSHVof 180 h‒1 was effective in upgrading the pyrolysis oil and other light olefins. The highest hydrocarbon (⩾C2) and liquid aromatics yields reached to 14.23 and 4.17 wt-%, respectively. The undesirable products including light oxygenates, furans dramatically decreased in the presence of the ZCCH catalyst.
Keywordscorncob monolith upgrading pyrolysis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This research was supported by the CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams. The National Science Fund Projects (Y731410602) and the Chinese Government “Thousand Talent” program funding.
- 12.Srinivas S T, Dalai A K, Bakhshi N N. Thermal and catalytic upgrading of a biomass-derived oil in a dual reaction system. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2000, 78(2): 343–354Google Scholar
- 29.Diebold J P, Chum H L, Evans R J, Milne T A, Reed T B, Scahill J W. In: Klass D L. ed. Energy from Biomass and Wastes X. London: IGT Chicago and Elsevier Applied Sciences Publishers, 1987, 801Google Scholar
- 31.Diebold J P, Beckman D, Bridgwater A V, Elliott D C, Solantausta Y. IEA technoeconomic analysis of the thermochemical conversion of biomass to gasoline by the NREL process. In: Bridgwater A V, ed. Advances in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion. Berlin: Springer Netherlands, 1994, 1325–1342Google Scholar
- 36.Cybulski A, Moulijn J. Monoliths in heterogeneous catalysis. Catalysis Reviews. Science and Engineering, 1994, 36(2): 179–270Google Scholar
- 37.Evans R J, Milne T A. In: Soltes E J, Milne T A, eds. Pyrolysis Oils from Biomass, Producing, Analysing and Upgrading. ACS Symposium Series 376. Washington DC: American Chemical Society, 1988, 328–341Google Scholar
- 42.Li J, Li X, Zhou G, Wang W, Wang C, Komarneni S, Wang Y. Catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass with mesoporous ZSM-5 zeolites prepared by desilication with NaOH solutions. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2014, 470(2): 115–122Google Scholar