Abstract
Industrial water treatment and industrial marine outfalls both function together to reduce the pollutant concentrations in the effluent and mitigate the potential impact on the environment. The former uses environmental treatment technology with energy and material cost considerations, while the latter utilizes the natural assimilation potential of the coastal water environment achievable at the outfall location. Because of their synergistic nature, marine outfalls are now commonly used for the disposal of partially treated domestic and industrial effluents in many coastal cities around the world, with many successful examples of low and acceptable risks to the environment. The objective of this paper is to review their balance from both environmental and economic considerations. We also discuss the end-of-the-pipe and mixing zone approaches for industrial effluents, and give some recommendations particularly for developing countries. Finally, we emphasize that a compulsory and vigorous monitoring program is essential regardless of how the balance is achieved.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
18 April 2017
An erratum has been published.
References
Ferraro S P, Swartz R C, Cole F A, Schults D W. Temporal changes in the benthos along a pollution gradient: Discriminating the effect of natural phenomena from sewage-industrial effluent effects. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 1991, 33(4): 383–407
Grace R A. An unusual marine outfall off central California, USA. Water & Maritime Engineering, 2001, 148(3): 133–141
Okus E, Ozturk I, Sur H I, Yuksek A, Tas S, Aslan-Yilmaz A, Altiok H, Balkis N, Dogan E, Ovez S, Aydin A F. Critical evaluation of wastewater treatment and disposal strategies for Istanbul with regards to water quality monitoring study results. Desalination, 2008, 226(1-3): 231–248
Vidal-Dorsch D E, Bay S M, Maruya K, Snyder S A, Trenholm R A, Vanderford B J. Contaminants of emerging concern in municipal wastewater effluents and marine receiving water. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2012, 31(12): 2674–2682
Yang L, Chang W S, Huang M N L. Natural disinfection of wastewater in marine outfall fields. Water Research, 2000, 34(3): 743–750
PUB. Singapore’s national water agency, 2015. http://www. pub. gov. sg/dtss/Pages/default. aspx
Xu J, Lee J H, Yin K, Liu H, Harrison P J. Environmental response to sewage treatment strategies: Hong Kong’s experience in long term water quality monitoring. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2011, 62(11): 2275–2287
Baxter J M, Boyd I L, Cox M, Donald A E, Malcolm S J, Miles H, Miller B, Moffat C F. Scotland’s Marine Atlas: Information for the National Marine Plan. Edinburgh: Marine Scotland, 2011, 191
Nigam R, Saraswat R, Panchang R. Application of foraminifers in ecotoxicology: Retrospect, perspect and prospect. Environment International, 2006, 32(2): 273–283
Roberts P J W, Salas H J, Reiff F M, Libhaber M, Labbe A, Thomson J C. Marine Effluent Outfalls and Treatment Systems. London: IWA publishing, 2010, 159–203
Pearce F. The unspeakable beaches of Britain. New Scientist, 1981, 91(1262): 139–142
Deng Y, Yang G. Pollution and protest in China: Environmental mobilization in context. China Quarterly, 2013, 214: 321–336
Grace R A. Marine Outfall Construction: Background, Techniques and Case Studies. Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers Press, 2009, 1–28
Chang N B, Wang S F. A grey nonlinear programming approach for planning coastal wastewater treatment and disposal systems. Water Science and Technology, 1995, 32(2): 19–29
Scanes P R, Philip N. Environmental impact of deepwater discharge of sewage off Sydney, NSW, Australia. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 1995, 31(4-12): 343–346
Taylor D I. The Boston Harbor project and large decreases in loadings of eutrophication-related materials in Boston Harbor. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2010, 60(4): 609–619
Yang L. Review of marine outfall systems in Taiwan. Water Science and Technology, 1995, 32(2): 257–264
NRC (National Research Council). Managing Wastewater in Coastal Urban Areas. Washington, DC: National Academic Press, 1993, 53–71
Tate P M, Scaturro S, Cathers B. Marine Outfall. In Dhanak M R, Xiros N, eds. Springer Handbook of Ocean Engineering. Berlin: Speringer-Verlag, 2016, 7–36
Foley J, De Haas D, Hartley K, Lant P. Comprehensive life cycle inventories of alternative wastewater treatment systems. Water Research, 2010, 44(5): 1654–1666
Lundie S, Peters G M, Beavis P C. Life cycle assessment for sustainable metropolitan water systems planning. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(13): 3465–3473
Vigneswaran S, ed. Water and Wastewater Treatment Technologies (Volume 2). Oxford: EOLSS Publisher, 2009, 282
Pillay S D. An environmental life cycle assessment of the provision of recycled water in Durban. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Durban: University of Kwazulu-Natal, 2006, Chapter 3
Libhaber M, Orozco-Jaramillo Á. Sustainable Treatment and Reuse of Municipal Effluent: For Decision Makers and Practicing Engineers. London: Iwa Publishing, 2012, 8–81
Rubio J, Souza M L, Smith R W. Overview of flotation as a wastewater treatment technique. Minerals Engineering, 2002, 15(3): 139–155
Ujang Z, Henze M. Municipal Wastewater Management in Developing Countries-Principles and Engineering. London: Taylor & Francis, 2003, 70–97
Aiyuk S, Forrez I, Lieven D K, Van Haandel A, Verstraete W. Anaerobic and complementary treatment of domestic sewage in regions with hot climates—A review. Bioresource Technology, 2006, 97(17): 2225–2241
De la Noüe J, Lalibereté G, Proulx D. Algae and wastewater. Journal of Applied Phycology, 1992, 4(3): 247–254
Verma A K, Dash R R, Bhunia P. A review on chemical coagulation/ flocculation technologies for removal of colour from textile effluents. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 93(1): 154–168
Sarayu K, Sandhya S. Current technologies for biological treatment of textile wastewater—A review. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2012, 167(3): 645–661
Grace R A. Marine Outfall Systems: Planning, Design and Construction. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1978, 1–16
Wood I R, Bell R G, Wilkinson D L. Ocean Disposal of Waste. Hong Kong: World Scientific, 1993
Roberts P J W, Ferrier A, Daviero G. Mixing in inclined dense jets. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1997, 123(8): 693–699
Jiang B, Law AW K, Lee J H W. Mixing of 30° and 45° inclined dense jets in shallow coastal waters. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2014, 140(3): 241–253
Shao D D, Law AWK. Mixing and boundary interactions of 30 and 45 degree inclined dense jets. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 10(5): 521–553
Wallis J G. Ocean outfall construction cost. Water Pollution Control Federation, 1979, 51(5): 951–957
Gunnerson C G, French J A. Wastewater Management for Coastal Cities: The Ocean Disposal Option. Heidelberg: Springer, 1996, 311–339
Frith S J, Staples K D. North Tyneside Bathing Waters’ Scheme. Water and Environment Journal, 1995, 9(1): 55–62
Price A C, Clark S, Roe M K, Lloyd T C. The Seaton Carew Sewerage Scheme: Design features and contractual arrangements. Water and Environment Journal, 1993, 7(1): 72–80
Smith P H. Upgrading of sewerage assets to comply with new legislation: A Lothian regional viewpoint. Water and Environment Journal, 1992, 6(2): 641–645
Bigot L, Conand C, Amouroux J M, Frouin P, Bruggemann H, Grémare A. Effects of industrial outfalls on tropical macrobenthic sediment communities in Reunion Island (Southwest Indian Ocean). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2006, 52(8): 865–880
WHO (World Health Organization). Guidelines for safe recreational water environments 2003, 51–96
Rodgers T. Treated Sewage Waiver Signed. San Diego: Union Tribune, September 14, 2002
Grigg R W, Dollar S J. Environmental protection misapplied: Alleged versus documented impacts of a deep ocean sewage outfall in Hawaii. Ambio, 1995, 24(2): 125–128
USEPA. Amended Section 301(h) Technical support document. Oceans and coastal protection div. (4504F), office of wetlands, oceans and watersheds. EPA842-B-94-007, September, 1994, 1–139
Blackman A. Colombia’s discharge fee program: Incentives for polluters or regulators? Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(1): 101–119
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Adrian W. K. Law received his PhD from the University of California at Berkeley. He was a practicing engineer in the USA for more than 7 years, before joining the academic faculty of the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. His current research focuses on the expert knowledge of environmental hydraulics to improve the design of membrane and desalination systems. He was recognized with the Karl Emil Hilgard Hydraulic Price as well as the Wesley Horner Award by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), and two Outstanding Technical Paper Awards by the Bechtel Corporation, USA. Currently, he is the Executive Committee Member of the International Association of Hydro-environment Engineering and Research (IAHR) Asian Pacific Division, Past-Chair of the Joint IAHR-IWA Committee on Marine Outfall Systems, as well as in the Editorial Board of related journals in this area. In Singapore, he is also the Director of the Environmental Process Modelling Centre (EPMC) in the Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute (NEWRI).
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Law, A.W.K., Tang, C. Industrial water treatment and industrial marine outfalls: Achieving the right balance. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 10, 472–479 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-016-1592-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-016-1592-0