Benefits of robotic surgery for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are still debated. We aimed to compare conventional laparoscopic (L-RYGB) to robotic RYGB (R-RYGB) and evaluate safety, efficacy, advantages and drawbacks of each procedure. A prospective cohort study with a retrospective review approach was conducted to analyze results of L-RYGB and R-RYGB performed at a bariatric center of excellence. Patient demographics, perioperative data, weight loss, comorbidities evolution and cost were assessed. One hundred and sixty-one severely obese patients underwent R-RYGB and L-RYGB, respectively. Patient’s characteristics were similar between groups. Intraoperative blood loss was similar (p = 0.91), with no requirement for blood transfusion. Median operative time was significantly reduced for R-RYGB (127 vs 160 min; p < 0.001). Seven patients (11.4%) in the L-RYGB group and 15 patients (15%) in the R-RYGB group had early postoperative complications (p = 0.63), with more anastomotic leaks and stenosis for R-RYGB during initial learning curve (p = NS). Mortality was null. Median length of hospital stay was similar (6 days; p = 0.20). Mean hospital cost was non-significantly increased for R-RYGB ($5730 vs. $4879; p = 0.34). Two years after surgery, median BMI and mean EWL% were similar for both groups (26.1 vs 26.5 kg/m2 and 89.9% vs 90.9% for L-RYGB and R-RYGB groups, respectively; p = 0.71 and 0.85, respectively), with no statistically significant difference in comorbidities between the two groups (p = 0.80). R-RYGB is feasible and safe within the reach of every laparoscopic surgeon. In our series, it was associated with shorter operative time and equivalent length of stay and weight loss outcomes compared to L-RYGB. Further well-designed randomized studies are necessary to draw safe conclusions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Availability of data and material
The datasets of the current study can be provided by the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Chobot A, Gorowska-Kowolik K, Sokolowska M, Jarosz-Chobot P (2018) Obesity and diabetes-Not only a simple link between two epidemics. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 34:e3042
Zhang C, Zhang J, Liu Z, Zhou Z (2018) More than an anti-diabetic bariatric surgery, metabolic surgery alleviates systemic and local inflammation in obesity. Obes Surg 28:3658–3668
Gagner M, Hutchinson C, Rosenthal R (2016) Fifth international consensus conference: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:750–756
American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (2018) Estimate of Bariatric Surgery Numbers, 2011–2018. https://asmbs.org/resources/estimateof-bariatric-surgery-numbers
Lee JH, Nguyen QN, Le QA (2016) Comparative effectiveness of 3 bariatric surgery procedures: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:997–1002
Ignat M, Vix M, Imad I, D’Urso A, Perretta S, Marescaux J, Mutter D (2017) Randomized trial of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in achieving excess weight loss. Br J Surg 104:248–256
Arterburn D, Wellman R, Emiliano A, Smith SR, Odegaard AO, Murali S, Williams N, Coleman KJ, Courcoulas A, Coley RY, Anau J, Pardee R, Toh S, Janning C, Cook A, Sturtevant J, Horgan C, McTigue KM, PCBS Collaborative (2018) Comparative effectiveness and safety of bariatric procedures for weight loss: a PCORnet cohort study. Ann Intern Med 169:741–750
Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, Caiazzo R, Sterkers A, Khamphommala L, Poghosyan T, Chevallier JM, Malherbe V, Chouillard E, Reche F, Torcivia A, Maucort-Boulch D, Bin-Dorel S, Langlois-Jacques C, Delaunay D, Pattou F, Disse E (2019) Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 393:1299–1309
Nguyen NT, Varela JE (2017) Bariatric surgery for obesity and metabolic disorders: state of the art. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:160–169
Lundberg PW, Wolfe S, Seaone J, Stoltzfus J, Claros L, El Chaar M (2018) Robotic gastric bypass is getting better: first results from the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:1240–1245
Aiolfi A, Tornese S, Bonitta G, Rausa E, Micheletto G, Bona D (2019) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach. Surg Obes Relat Dis 15:985–994
Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, Rocchietto S, Allieta R, Morino M (2011) Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 25:597–603
Buchs NC, Morel P, Azagury DE, Jung M, Chassot G, Huber O, Hagen ME, Pugin F (2014) Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study. Obes Surg 24:2031–2039
Smeenk RM, van’t Hof G, Elsten E, Feskens PG (2016) The results of 100 robotic versus 100 laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures: a single high volume centre experience. Obes Surg 26:1266–1273
Rogula T, Koprivanac M, Janik MR, Petrosky JA, Nowacki AS, Dombrowska A, Kroh M, Brethauer S, Aminian A, Schauer P (2018) Does robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass provide outcome advantages over standard laparoscopic approaches? Obes Surg 28:2589–2596
Celio AC, Kasten KR, Schwoerer A, Pories WJ, Spaniolas K (2017) Perioperative safety of laparoscopic versus robotic gastric bypass: a propensity matched analysis of early experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:1847–1852
Haute Autorité de Santé (2009) Obésité: prise en charge chirurgicale chez l'adulte. Saint Denis (France). HAS 1–263
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Vitiello A, Higa K, Himpens J, Buchwald H, Scopinaro N (2018) IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg 28:3783–3794
Beckmann JH, Bernsmeier A, Kersebaum JN, Mehdorn AS, von Schonfels W, Taivankhuu T, Laudes M, Schafmayer C, Egberts JH, Becker T (2020) The impact of robotics in learning Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective analysis of 214 laparoscopic and robotic procedures: robotic vs laparoscopic RYGB. Obes Surg 30:2403–2410
Li K, Zou J, Tang J, Di J, Han X, Zhang P (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 26:3031–3044
Economopoulos KP, Theocharidis V, McKenzie TJ, Sergentanis TN, Psaltopoulou T (2015) Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 25:2180–2189
Ahmad A, Carleton JD, Ahmad ZF, Agarwala A (2016) Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective, single-center study of early perioperative outcomes at a community hospital. Surg Endosc 30:3792–3796
Stefanidis D, Bailey SB, Kuwada T, Simms C, Gersin K (2018) Robotic gastric bypass may lead to fewer complications compared with laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 32:610–616
Senellart P, Saint-Jalmes G, Mfam WS, Abou-Mrad A (2020) Laparoscopic versus full robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: retrospective, single-center study of the feasibility and short-term results. J Robot Surg 14:291–296
Sharma G, Strong AT, Tu C, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR, Aminian A (2018) Robotic platform for gastric bypass is associated with more resource utilization: an analysis of MBSAQIP dataset. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:304–310
Moon RC, Gutierrez JC, Royall NA, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA (2016) Robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, is it safer than laparoscopic bypass? Obes Surg 26:1016–1020
Yu SC, Clapp BL, Lee MJ, Albrecht WC, Scarborough TK, Wilson EB (2006) Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses. Am J Surg 192:746–749
Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P, Hagen ME, Chassot G, Koutny-Fong P, Morel P (2012) Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 26:1116–1121
Benizri EI, Renaud M, Reibel N, Germain A, Ziegler O, Zarnegar R, Ayav A, Bresler L, Brunaud L (2013) Perioperative outcomes after totally robotic gastric bypass: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. Am J Surg 206:145–151
Lyn-Sue JR, Winder JS, Kotch S, Colello J, Docimo S (2016) Laparoscopic gastric bypass to robotic gastric bypass: time and cost commitment involved in training and transitioning an academic surgical practice. J Robot Surg 10:111–115
Bailey JG, Hayden JA, Davis PJ, Liu RY, Haardt D, Ellsmere J (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in obese adults ages 18 to 65 years: a systematic review and economic analysis. Surg Endosc 28:414–426
Hagen ME, Rohner P, Jung MK, Amirghasemi N, Buchs NC, Fakhro J, Buehler L, Morel P (2017) Robotic gastric bypass surgery in the Swiss Health Care System: analysis of hospital costs and reimbursement. Obes Surg 27:2099–2105
Horgan S, Vanuno D (2001) Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 11:415–419
Pastrana M, Stoltzfus J, Al-Mandini A, El-Chaar M (2020) Evolution of outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery: first report based on MBSAQIP database. Surg Obes Relat Dis 16:912–916
No funding was received for this study.
Conflict of interest
Panagiotis Lainas, Radwan Kassir, Marine Benois, Joseph Derienne, Tarek Debs, Maissa Safieddine, Jean Gugenheim, Ibrahim Dagher, and Imed Ben Amor declare to have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
The participant has consented to the submission of this report to the journal.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Lainas, P., Kassir, R., Benois, M. et al. Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in severely obese patients. J Robotic Surg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01181-5
- Bariatric surgery
- Gastric bypass