Multivisceral robotic liver surgery: feasible and safe

Abstract

The application of robotic technology allows for the performance of multi-organ liver resections by multidisciplinary teams in a minimally invasive manner. Their technique and outcomes are not established. Herein we describe our technique with robotic liver surgery combined with colon, pancreas and urologic resections. Our patients are an 84-year-old (yo) female (Body Mass Index, BMI: 25) with a recently diagnosed right colon adenocarcinoma and two synchronous liver metastases at segments 5 and 6, a 75-year-old female (BMI: 50.4) with a history of right renal cell cancer status post (s/p) right robotic radical nephrectomy now with tumor recurrence with multiple intra-abdominal masses including a segment 7 liver lesion and a 71-year-old female (BMI: 24) with history of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the tail and a segment 3 liver lesion s/p neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The Xi robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was utilized in all cases. Port placement in all cases was decided within the multidisciplinary teams to accommodate both the hepatic and the extra-hepatic portion of the operation. Parenchymal transections were performed with the use of the Vessel Sealer and the robotic stapler as appropriate. Indocyanine green (ICG) was used to assess the anastomotic perfusion in the first patient. Blood loss was 50 ml for the first two cases and 300 ml for the third. Surgical margins were negative in all cases. Patients were discharged at POD 8, 3 and 5 with one patient experiencing postoperative ileus. Robotic multivisceral liver resections are feasible and safe within multidisciplinary surgical teams with expertise in robotic surgery. The robotic platform can offer a minimally invasive approach in liver surgery synchronous with colonic, pancreatic and urologic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Chen J, Li Q, Wang C, Zhu H, Shi Y, Zhao G (2011) Simultaneous vs staged resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a metaanalysis. Int J Colorectal Disease 26(2):191–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1018-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Silberhumer GR, Paty PB, Denton B, Guillem J, Gonen M, Araujo RLC, Nash GM, Temple LK, Allen PJ, DeMatteo RP, Weiser MR, Wong WD, Jarnagin WR, D’Angelica MI, Fong Y (2016) Long-term oncologic outcomes for simultaneous resection of synchronous metastatic liver and primary colorectal cancer. Surgery 160(1):67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.02.029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gagner MRM, Dubuc J (1992) Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor (abstract). Surg Endosc 6(99):99

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 Cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250(5):831–841. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4df

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Beppu T, Aihara A, Hasegawa K, Gotohda N, Hatano E, Tanahashi Y, Mizuguchi T, Kamiyama T, Ikeda T, Tanaka S, Taniai N, Baba H, Tanabe M, Kokudo N, Konishi M, Uemoto S, Sugioka A, Hirata K, Taketomi A, Maehara Y, Kubo S, Uchida E, Miyata H, Nakamura M, Kaneko H, Yamaue H, Miyazaki M, Takada T (2015) Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 22(10):721–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Beppu T, Wakabayashi G, Hasegawa K, Gotohda N, Mizuguchi T, Takahashi Y, Hirokawa F, Taniai N, Watanabe M, Katou M, Nagano H, Honda G, Baba H, Kokudo N, Konishi M, Hirata K, Yamamoto M, Uchiyama K, Uchida E, Kusachi S, Kubota K, Mori M, Takahashi K, Kikuchi K, Miyata H, Takahara T, Nakamura M, Kaneko H, Yamaue H, Miyazaki M, Takada T (2015) Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 22(10):711–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Ciccarelli LF, Kim J, Benedetti E (2016) Robotic liver surgery: technical aspects and review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5(4):311–321. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2015.10.05

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Calin ML, Sadiq A, Arevalo G, Fuentes R, Flanders VL, Gupta N, Nasri B, Singh K (2016) The first case report of robotic multivisceral resection for synchronous liver metastasis from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: a case report and literature review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(10):816–824. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Xu JM, Wei Y, Wang XY, Fan H, Chang WJ, Ren L, Jiang W, Fan J, Qin XY (2015) Robot-assisted one-stage resection of rectal cancer with liver and lung metastases. World J Gastroenterol 21(9):2848–2853. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i9.2848

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chen PD, Wu CY, Hu RH, Chou WH, Lai HS, Liang JT, Lee PH, Wu YM (2017) Robotic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol 24(4):1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5638-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, Sabbaghian S, Tohme S, Steel J, Marsh W, Reddy SK, Bartlett DL (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Szold A, Bergamaschi R, Broeders I, Dankelman J, Forgione A, Lango T, Melzer A, Mintz Y, Morales-Conde S, Rhodes M, Satava R, Tang CN, Vilallonga R, European Association of Endoscopic S (2015) European association of endoscopic surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery. Surg Endosc 29(2):253–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3916-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Spampinato MG, Mandala L, Quarta G, Del Medico P, Baldazzi G (2013) One-stage, totally laparoscopic major hepatectomy and colectomy for colorectal neoplasm with synchronous liver metastasis: safety, feasibility and short-term outcome. Surgery 153(6):861–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tranchart H, Diop PS, Lainas P, Pourcher G, Catherine L, Franco D, Dagher I (2011) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy can be safely performed with colorectal surgery for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 13(1):46–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00238.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chen PD, Wu CY, Hu RH, Chen CN, Yuan RH, Liang JT, Lai HS, Wu YM (2017) Robotic major hepatectomy: is there a learning curve? Surgery 161(3):642–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byrne Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Drs. Ioannis T. Konstantinidis, Mustafa Raoof, Vasilena Zheleva, Kelly Lafaro, William Chu, Clayton Lau and Byrne Lee declare that they have no conflict of interest. Dr Fong serves as Scientific advisor to Medtronics, Johnson and Johnson, Olympus, Intuitive Surgical, Perfint Robotics, Avra Robotics.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 318691 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konstantinidis, I.T., Raoof, M., Zheleva, V. et al. Multivisceral robotic liver surgery: feasible and safe. J Robotic Surg 14, 503–507 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-01017-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Robotic
  • Multivisceral resections
  • Liver surgery
  • Minimally invasive liver surgery