Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technique of robotic left hepatectomy : how we approach it

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Minimally invasive technique has been adopted as the standard of care in many surgical fields within general surgery. Hepatobiliary surgery, however, is lacking behind due to the complex nature of the operation and concerns of major bleeding. Several centers suggested that inherent limitations of conventional laparoscopy precludes its wide adoption. Robotic technique provides solutions to these limitations. In this study, we report our standardized technique of robotic left hepatectomy. We discuss aspects of robotic hepatectomy and describe our standardized approach for robotic left hepatectomy. A video is attached to this article. A 76-year-old man with a 4.5 cm biopsy-proven hepatocellular carcinoma was taken to the operating room for a robotic left hepatectomy. His past medical and surgical history was only consistent with hypertension and diabetes. Robotic extrahepatic glissonian pedicle approach was applied to gain inflow control. Left hepatic artery and portal vein were individually dissected and isolated prior to division. An intraoperative robotic ultrasound was utilized to ensure negative resection margins. Left hepatic vein was transected intrahepatically using a laparoscopic Endo GIA stapler. Segment 2,3, and part of 4 were removed. Operative time was 180 min without intraoperative complications. Estimated blood loss was less than 50 cc. The patient was discharged home on postoperative day 3. The use of robotic technology during complex hepatic resections such as left hepatectomy is safe and feasible. This approach provides an alternative technique in minimally invasive liver surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009 Nov) World review of laparoscopic liver resection—2804 patients. Ann Surg 250(5):831–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH et al (2012) Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures. Surg Endosc 26(8):2247–2258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ocuin LM, Tsung A (2015 Sep) Robotic liver resection for malignancy: Current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications. J Surg Oncol 112(3):295–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN (2013) Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome. Am J Surg 205(6):697–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C et al (2005 Jul) Laparoscopic liver resections: a single center experience. Surg Endosc 19(7):886–891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bryant R, Laurent A, Tayar C et al (2009) Laparoscopic liver resection-understanding its role in current practice: the Henri Mondor Hospital experience. Ann Surg 250(1):103–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsung A, Geller DA (2015) Reply to letter: “does the robot provide an advantage over laparoscopic liver resection?”. Ann Surg 262(2):e70–e71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Packiam V, Bartlett DL, Tohme et al (2012) Minimally invasive liver resection: robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 16(12):2233–2238

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Troisi RI, Patriti A, Montalti R, Casciola L (2013) Robot assistance in liver surgery: a real advantage over a fully laparoscopic approach? Results of a comparative bi-institutional analysis. Int J Med Robot 9(2):160–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F et al. (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford). 12(8):583–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Casciola L, Patriti A, Ceccarelli G et al (2011) Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesions located in the posterosuperior segments. Surg Endosc 25(12):3815–3824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ryska M, Fronek J, Rudis J et al (2006) Manual and robotic laparoscopic liver resection. Two case-reviews. Rozhl Chir 85(10):511–516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gazelle GS, Lee MJ, Mueller PR (1994) Cholangiographic segmental anatomy of the liver. Radiographics 14(5):1005–1013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Puente SG, Bannura GC (1983) Radiological anatomy of the biliary tract: variations and congenital abnormalities. World J Surg 7(2):271–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi SH, Choi GH, Han DH et al (2015 Feb) Laparoscopic liver resection using a rubber band retraction technique: usefulness and perioperative outcome in 100 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 29(2):387–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee JH, Han DH, Jang DS, Choi GH, Choi JS (2016) Robotic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach for anatomic liver resection in the right liver: techniques and perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 30(9):3882–3888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Farello GA, Cerofolini A, Rebonato M et al (1995) Congenital choledochal cyst: video-guided laparoscopic treatment. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5(5):354–358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Qiu J, Chen S, Chengyou D (2016) A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 30(3):862–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM et al (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kingham TP, Leung U, Kuk D, Gönen M, D’Angelica MI, Allen PJ (2016) Robotic liver resection: a case-matched comparison. World J Surg 40(6):1422–1428

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Ciccarelli LF, Kim J, Benedetti E (2016) Robotic liver surgery: technical aspects and review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5(4):311–321

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F et al (2011) Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery 149:29–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lai EC, Tang CN, Li MK (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy: technique and surgical outcomes. Int J Surg 10:11–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu YM, Hu RH, Lai HS, Lee PH (2014) Robotic-assisted minimally invasive liver resection. Asian J Surg 37:53–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iswanto Sucandy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author Sucandy, Author Gravetz, Author Ross, Author Rosemurgy declare no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (M4V 108891 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sucandy, I., Gravetz, A., Ross, S. et al. Technique of robotic left hepatectomy : how we approach it. J Robotic Surg 13, 201–207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0890-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0890-6

Keywords

Navigation