Operative time and length of stay is similar between robotic assisted and laparoscopic colon and rectal resections
Robotic-assisted surgery is increasingly being utilized for colorectal surgery. Data are scarce and contradictory when outcomes are compared between robotic and laparoscopic surgery. All patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery were compared from 2011 to 2016. Outcomes between the two groups were statistically analyzed. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. 185 patients underwent laparoscopic resection and 70 underwent robotic resection. Demographics, ASA score, and BMI were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was no statistical difference in median length of stay between laparoscopic and robotic colon (both 4 days; p = 0.5) and rectal (6 vs 4.5 days; p = 0.2) resections. Median operative times were also similar between the two approaches for colon (150.5 vs 169.5 min, p = 0.2) and rectal (197.0 vs 231.5 min, p = 0.9) resections. There was also no difference in operative time between the two approaches for right (median = 137 vs 130.5 min; p = 0.9) and left (median = 162.0 vs 170.5 min; p = 0.6) colectomies. Robotic surgery results in similar operative times and length of stay as laparoscopic surgery for patients undergoing colon and rectal resections.
KeywordsRobotic surgery Operative time Length of stay
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
- 2.Trinh BB, Hauch AT, Buell JF, Kandil E (2014) Robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery. JSLS 18:00154Google Scholar
- 14.Petrucciani N, Sirimarco D, Nigri GR, Magistri P, La Torre M, D’Angelo F, Aurello, Ramacciato G (2015) Robotic right colectomy: a worthwhile procedure? results of a meta-analysis of trials comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy. J Minim Access Surg 11:22–28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Melich G, Hong YK, Kim J, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Sender Liberman A, Min BS (2015) Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves. Surg Endosc 29:558–568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.De Hoog DE, Heemskerk J, Nieman FH, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Bouvy ND (2009) Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus roboti-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1201–1206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar