Advertisement

Journal of Robotic Surgery

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 139–145 | Cite as

Robot-assisted laparoscopic Y-V plasty in 12 patients with refractory bladder neck contracture

  • Michael Musch
  • Jan Lukas Hohenhorst
  • Anne Vogel
  • Heinrich Loewen
  • Susanne Krege
  • Darko Kroepfl
Original Article

Abstract

We present preliminary results of a case series on refractory bladder neck contracture (BNC) treated with robot-assisted laparoscopic Y-V plasty (RAYV). Between 01/2013 and 02/2016, 12 consecutive adult male patients underwent RAYV in our hospital. BNC developed after transurethral procedures (n = 9), simple prostatectomy (n = 2) and HIFU therapy of the prostate (n = 1). Each patient had had multiple unsuccessful previous endoscopic treatments. All RAYV procedures were performed using a transperitoneal six-port approach (four-arm robotic setting). There were no intraoperative or major postoperative complications. During a median follow-up of 23.2 months two cases of refractory BNC were observed. In both cases a postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 20 and 25 was reported, respectively. In contrast, amongst the patients without evidence of refractory BNC the median IPSS was 6.5 reflecting an only mildly impaired voiding function in most cases, thus, suggesting a treatment success in 83.3% of patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on RAYV for refractory BNC. In our series RAYV was feasible in all patients, and only two cases of refractory BNC were reported during a median follow-up of almost 2 years. At the same time, no intraoperative or major postoperative complications were observed. More clinical data with a longer follow-up are needed in this promising field to reveal the actual efficacy and relevance of RAYV.

Keywords

Urinary bladder neck obstruction Reconstructive surgical procedure Robotic surgical procedures Feasibility study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ms. Hilary Coleman (medical translator) for revision of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Michael Musch, Jan Lukas Hohenhorst, Anne Vogel, Heinrich Loewen, Susanne Krege and Darko Kroepfl declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Latini JM, McAninch JW, Brandes SB, Chung JY, Rosenstein D (2014) SIU/ICUD Consultation On Urethral Strictures: epidemiology, etiology, anatomy, and nomenclature of urethral stenoses, strictures, and pelvic fracture urethral disruption injuries. Urology 83(3 Suppl):S1–S7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, de la Rosette J, Gilling P, Gratzke C, McVary K, Novara G, Woo H, Madersbacher S (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol 67(6):1066–1096CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Helfand B, Mouli S, Dedhia R, McVary KT (2006) Management of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia with open prostatectomy: results of a contemporary series. J Urol 176(6 Pt 1):2557–2561 (discussion 2561) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rebillard X, Soulié M, Chartier-Kastler E, Davin JL, Mignard JP, Moreau JL, Coulange C, d’Urologie Association Francaise (2008) High-intensity focused ultrasound in prostate cancer; a systematic literature review of the French Association of Urology. BJU Int 101(10):1205–1213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramirez D, Simhan J, Hudak SJ, Morey AF (2013) Standardized approach for the treatment of refractory bladder neck contractures. Urol Clin N Am 40(3):371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sokoloff MH, Michel K, Smith RB (2010) Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate. In: Taneja SS (ed) Complications of urologic surgery—prevention and management, 4th edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 279–294Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O’Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, Cockett AT (1992) The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 148(5):1549–1557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rassweiler J, Pini G, Gözen AS, Klein J, Teber D (2010) Role of laparoscopy in reconstructive surgery. Curr Opin Urol 20(6):471–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Musch M, Hohenhorst L, Pailliart A, Loewen H, Davoudi Y, Kroepfl D (2013) Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery of the distal ureter: single institution experience in 16 patients. BJU Int 111(5):773–783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    MacAlister CL (1958) The treatment of bladder-neck sclerosis by retropubic reconstruction. Br J Urol 30(1):31–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Colabawalla BN (1969) Adult bladder neck contracture—100 Y-V plasties. Br J Urol 41(5):601PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urology, Paediatric Urology and Urologic OncologyKliniken Essen-MitteEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations