Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 1207–1216 | Cite as

Single Anastomosis Duodenal-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy/One Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO Position Statement

  • Wendy A. Brown
  • Geraldine Ooi
  • Kelvin Higa
  • Jacques Himpens
  • Antonio Torres
  • on behalf of the IFSO-appointed task force reviewing the literature on SADI-S/OADS
Original Contributions

Abstract

The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) has played an integral role in educating both the metabolic surgical and the medical community at large about the role of innovative and new surgical and or endoscopic interventions in treating adiposity-based chronic diseases. The single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is also called the one anastomosis duodenal switch (OADS). This is a relatively new procedure that has been proposed as an alternative to the currently accepted duodenal switch (DS) procedure. The IFSO commissioned a task force (Appendix 1) to determine if SADI-S/OADS is an effective and safe procedure and if it should be considered a surgical option for the treatment of adiposity and adiposity-based chronic diseases. The following position statement is issued by the IFSO SADI-S/OADS task force and approved by the IFSO Executive Board. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence. It will be reviewed in 2 years.

Keywords

Position statement IFSO OADS SADI 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Brown reports grants from Johnson and Johnson, grants from Medtronic, grants from GORE, personal fees from GORE, grants from Applied Medical, grants from Apollo Endosurgery, grants and personal fees from Novo Nordisc, personal fees from Merck Sharpe and Dohme, outside the submitted work. Dr. Himpens reports personal fees from Ethicon, personal fees from Medtronic, outside the submitted work. Dr. Ooi reports personal fees from the National Health and Medical Research Council, personal fees from Royal Australasian College of Surgeon, outside the submitted work. Dr. Higa has nothing to disclose. Dr. Torres has nothing to disclose.

Ethics Statement

Ethical approval is not required for this type of study.

Patient Consent

Patient consent is not required for this type of study.

References

  1. 1.
    DeMeester TR et al. Experimental and clinical results with proximal end-to-end duodenojejunostomy for pathologic duodenogastric reflux. Ann Surg. 1987;206(4):414–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Traverso LW, Longmire Jr WP. Preservation of the pylorus in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978;146(6):959–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8(3):267–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marceau P et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with gastrectomy as surgical treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 1991;1(4):381–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Brien P, McPhail T, Chaston T, et al. Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16(8):1032–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marceau P, Biron S, Marceau S, et al. Long-term metabolic outcomes 5 to 20 years after biliopancreatic diversion. Obes Surg. 2015;25(9):1584–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Angrisani L, et al. Bariatric surgery and endoluminal procedures: IFSO Worldwide Survey 2014. Obes Surg. 2017.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanchez-Pernaute A et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17(12):1614–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mitzman B, Cottam D, Goriparthi R, et al. Stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery for morbid obesity: retrospective analyses of our preliminary experience. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2098–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee WJ, Lee KT, Kasama K, et al. Laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG): short-term result and comparison with gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24(1):109–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang CK, Goel R, Tai CM, et al. Novel metabolic surgery for type II diabetes mellitus: loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23(6):481–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karcz WK, Kuesters S, Marjanovic G, et al. Duodeno-enteral omega switches—more physiological techniques in metabolic surgery. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2013;8(4):273–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. Mid-term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1302–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chiappetta S, Stier C, Scheffel O, et al. The first case report of failed single-anastomosis-duodeno-ileal bypass converted to one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini-gastric bypass. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;35:68–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cottam A, Cottam D, Medlin W, et al. A matched cohort analysis of single anastomosis loop duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 18-month follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2016a;30(9):3958–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cottam A, Cottam D, Portenier D, et al. A matched cohort analysis of stomach intestinal pylorus saving (SIPS) surgery versus biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with two-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(2):454–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cottam A et al. A matched cohort analysis of sleeve gastrectomy with and without 300 cm loop duodenal switch with 18-month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2016b;26(10):2363–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grueneberger JM, Karcz-Socha I, Marjanovic G, et al. Pylorus preserving loop duodeno-enterostomy with sleeve gastrectomy—preliminary results. BMC Surg. 2014;14:20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang CK, Tai CM, Chang PC, et al. Loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: comparative study with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in type 2 diabetic patients with a BMI <35 kg/m2, first year results. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2291–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang CK, Wang MY, Das SS, et al. Laparoscopic conversion to loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy for intractable dumping syndrome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-two case reports. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):947.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee WJ, Almulaifi AM, Tsou JJ, et al. Duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy versus the sleeve gastrectomy procedure alone: the role of duodenal exclusion. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):765–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morales H et al. Gastrectomia vertical y derivacion duodeno-ileal de anastomosis unica termino-lateral en bariatria: Experiencia en 100 casos [Spanish]. Bariatrica e Metabolica Iberoamericana. 2012;2(3):76–80.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nelson L et al. Safety and effectiveness of single anastomosis duodenal switch procedure: preliminary results from a single institution. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2016;29(Suppl 1):80–4.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sanchez-Pernaute A et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1720–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sanchez-Pernaute A et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015b;11(5):1092–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sanchez-Pernaute A et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a second step after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015a;11(2):351–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sanchez-Pernaute A et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surgery Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(5):731–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Summerhays C, Cottam D, Cottam A. Internal hernia aomparative study with Roux-en-tch surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):e13–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Surve A, Zaveri H, Cottam D, et al. A retrospective comparison of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with single anastomosis duodenal switch (SIPS-stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery) at a single institution with two year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(3):415–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vilallonga R et al. Robotically assisted single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass after previous sleeve gastrectomy implementing high valuable technology for complex procedures. J Obes. 2015;2015:586419.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim J. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery statement on single-anastomosis duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(5):944–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendy A. Brown
    • 1
  • Geraldine Ooi
    • 1
  • Kelvin Higa
    • 1
  • Jacques Himpens
    • 1
  • Antonio Torres
    • 1
  • on behalf of the IFSO-appointed task force reviewing the literature on SADI-S/OADS
  1. 1.International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic DisordersNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations