Obesity Surgery

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 1144–1145 | Cite as

There Is no Ideal Bariatric Procedure

  • Mario Musella
  • Nunzio Velotti
Letter to Editor/LED Reply


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare that: (1), in the past 5 years, have notreceived reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this manuscript, either nowor in the future; (2) do not hold any stocks or shares in an organization that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future; (3) do not hold or are not currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the manuscript; (4) have not received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript; (5) do not have any other financial competing interests or financial ties to disclose; and (6) do not have non-financial competing interests (political, personal, religious, ideological, academic, intellectual, commercial, or any other) to declare in relation to this manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Musella M, Susa A, Manno E, et al. Complications following the mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB): a multi-institutional survey on 2678 patients with a mid-term (5 years) follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2956–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Switzer NJ, Merani S, Skubleny D, et al. Quality of follow-up: systematic review of the research in bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2016;263(5):875–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, et al. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1153–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015;25(6):951–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahawar KK, Himpens J, Shikora SA, et al. The first consensus statement on one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) using a modified Delphi approach. Obes Surg. 2017Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):734–40CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gribsholt SB, Svensson E, Richelsen B, et al. Rate of acute hospital admissions before and after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a population-based cohort study. Ann Surg. 2018;267(2):319–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Genco A, Soricelli E, Casella G, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a possible, underestimated long-term complication. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(4):568–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Musella M, Milone M, Gaudioso D, et al. A decade of bariatric surgery. What have we learned? Outcome in 520 patients from a single institution. Int J Surg. 2014;12(Suppl 1):S183–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Medical SchoolFederico II UniversityNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations