Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Utility of Immediate Postoperative Upper Gastrointestinal Contrast Study in Bariatric Surgery

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Routine use of postoperative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast studies after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is controversial. We sought to determine the usefulness of routine UGI contrast studies during postoperative day (POD) 1 in patients who underwent bariatric surgery.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent SG or RYGB between January 1, 2016, and October 31, 2017. Demographics, surgical data, and immediate surgical adverse effects were collected. We compared patients who underwent routine UGI contrast studies on POD 1 versus patients who did not.

Results

A total of 284 patients were analyzed; 197 (69.4%) patients underwent RYGB, while 87 (30.6%) underwent SG. Routine UGI contrast study was performed in 96 (48.7%) patients in the RYGB group versus 31 (35.6%) in the SG group. The overall adverse effect rate was 2 (0.7%); postoperative UGI contrast study was negative in both cases. Mean (SD) length of stay (LOS) for patients who underwent UGI contrast study versus those who did not was similar in the RYGB group (1.8 [1.6] days vs 1.8 [0.9] days, respectively) and the SG group (2 [1.18] days vs 1.9 [0.9] days). The average cost of a postoperative UGI contrast study was $600, resulting in an additional overall cost of $76,800.

Conclusion

Use of routine UGI contrast studies after bariatric procedures does not appear to add clinical value for the detection of leaks. Furthermore, systematic use of postoperative UGI contrast studies neither seem to reduce LOS, nor appear to increase procedure costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim DD, Basu A. Estimating the medical care costs of obesity in the United States: systematic review, meta-analysis, and empirical analysis. Value Health. 2016;19(5):602–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sturm R, Ringel JS, Andreyeva T. Increasing obesity rates and disability trends. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23(2):199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Craig BM, Tseng DS. Cost-effectiveness of gastric bypass for severe obesity. Am J Med. 2002;113(6):491–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher BL, Schauer P. Medical and surgical options in the treatment of severe obesity. Am J Surg. 2002;184(6B):9S–16S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin LF, White S, Lindstrom Jr W. Cost-benefit analysis for the treatment of severe obesity. World J Surg. 1998;22(9):1008–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Varela JE, Nguyen NT. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leads the U.S. utilization of bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(5):987–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakran N, Goitein D, Raziel A, et al. Gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter experience with 2,834 patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1):240–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee S, Carmody B, Wolfe L, et al. Effect of location and speed of diagnosis on anastomotic leak outcomes in 3828 gastric bypass cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(6):708–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamilton EC, Sims TL, Hamilton TT, et al. Clinical predictors of leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(5):679–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sims TL, Mullican MA, Hamilton EC, et al. Routine upper gastrointestinal gastrografin swallow after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2003;13(1):66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rebibo L, Cosse C, Robert B, et al. Eliminating routine upper gastrointestinal contrast studies after sleeve gastrectomy decreases length of stay and hospitalization costs. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(4):553–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):515–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Serafini F, Anderson W, Ghassemi P, et al. The utility of contrast studies and drains in the management of patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2002;12(1):34–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wittgrove AC, Clark GW. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y-500 patients: technique and results, with 3-60 month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2000;10(3):233–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim J, Azagury D, Eisenberg D, et al. ASMBS position statement on prevention, detection, and treatment of gastrointestinal leak after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, including the roles of imaging, surgical exploration, and nonoperative management. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):739–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzalez R, Sarr MG, Smith CD, et al. Diagnosis and contemporary management of anastomotic leaks after gastric bypass for obesity. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(1):47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leslie DB, Dorman RB, Anderson J, et al. Routine upper gastrointestinal imaging is superior to clinical signs for detecting gastrojejunal leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(2):208–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyass S, Khalili TM, Cunneen S, et al. Radiological studies after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: routine or selective? Am Surg. 2004;70(10):918–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Madan AK, Stoecklein HH, Ternovits CA, et al. Predictive value of upper gastrointestinal studies versus clinical signs for gastrointestinal leaks after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(2):194–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McCarty TM, Arnold DT, Lamont JP, et al. Optimizing outcomes in bariatric surgery: outpatient laparoscopic gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2005;242(4):494–8. discussion 498-501

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh R, Fisher BL. Sensitivity and specificity of postoperative upper GI series following gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2003;13(1):73–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Perez M, Brunaud L, Kedaifa S, et al. Does anatomy explain the origin of a leak after sleeve gastrectomy? Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1717–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Csendes A, Braghetto I, Leon P, et al. Management of leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with obesity. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(9):1343–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA. Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(6):1509–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rahman U, Docimo S, Pryor AD, et al. Routine contrast imaging after bariatric surgery and the effect on hospital length of stay. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(4):517–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Spaniolas K, Kasten KR, Sippey ME, et al. Pulmonary embolism and gastrointestinal leak following bariatric surgery: when do major complications occur? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):379–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dallal RM, Bailey L, Nahmias N. Back to basics--clinical diagnosis in bariatric surgery. Routine drains and upper GI series are unnecessary. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(12):2268–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Malczak P, Pisarska M, Piotr M, et al. Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1):226–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA

    Tamara Diaz Vico & Enrique F. Elli

Authors
  1. Tamara Diaz Vico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Enrique F. Elli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrique F. Elli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval Statement

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed Consent Statement

Does not apply.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Portions of this manuscript have been published in abstract form: Elli E, Vinan-Vega M. Utility of immediate postoperative upper gastrointestinal contrast study in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28(Suppl 2):131.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diaz Vico, T., Elli, E.F. Utility of Immediate Postoperative Upper Gastrointestinal Contrast Study in Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 29, 1130–1133 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-03639-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-03639-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation