Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) became a prevalent bariatric procedure in Israel, while laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) was losing ground, due to high failure rates (40 % at 10 years). Many patients after LAGB failure choose LSG as a further bariatric surgery (secondary LSG). However, LAGB often impairs upper stomach anatomy and physiology, which may contribute to complications increased risk after secondary LSG, in comparison to surgery-naive obese patients choosing LSG (primary LSG).
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted on a prospective database, looking at morbidly obese patients for LSG surgery. All procedures were done by a single surgeon at the Soroka Medical Center between January 2008 and March 2013. Data were collected from hospitalization charts on demographics, biometric and bariatric status, medical and bariatric surgical history, post-LSG morbidity, and mortality.
Results
Three hundred eight patients underwent LSG during the study period, 181 (58.8 %) had a primary LSG while 127 (41.2 %) had a secondary LSG. No mortality occurred in both groups. Odds ratio for major complication (leak, stenosis) was 3.12 [CI 0.90–10.75] among the secondary LSG group, compared to the primary LSG (p = 0.071). The risk for major complication was doubled (OR = 2, 95 % CI [1.36–3.06]) for each one of previous bariatric procedure underwent (p = 0.001). Significant differences were found between the two groups regarding number and length of readmissions and number of imaging tests (p value = 0.027, 0.022, and 0.049, respectively).
Conclusions
Primary LSG is a safe and efficient bariatric procedure. After failed LAGB, secondary LSG should be carefully considered, because of a potentially higher risk of complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CDC. CDC report of US Health in 2012. Available in: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus12.pdf#063.
[Israel] Comparison to OECD—additional details [on obesity]. Available in: http://www.health.gov.il/PublicationsFiles/HealthataGlance2013.pdf.
NHLBI Obesity Education Initiative Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Obesity in Adults (US). Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. The Evidence Report: Bethesda (MD): National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Report No.: 98-4083. 1998 Sept.Available in: NOEIE Panel - 1998 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Batchelder AJ, Williams R, Sutton C. The evolution of minimally invasive bariatric surgery. J Surg Res. 2013;183(2):559–66.
Chapman WH, Cunningham E, Pories WJ. Bariatric surgery and diabetes: access denied. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15 Suppl 1:S83–7.
Cavarretta E, Casella G, Calì B, Dammaro C, Biondi-Zoccai G, Iossa A, et al. Cardiac remodeling in obese patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. World J Surg. 2013;37(3):565–72.
Victorzon M, Tolonen P. Mean fourteen-year, 100 % follow-up of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(5):753–7.
Lazzati A, Guy-Lachuer R, Delaunay V, Szwarcensztein K, Azoulay D. Bariatric surgery trends in France: 2005-2011. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Aug 26. pii:S1550-7289(13)00253-0.
Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):427–36.
Sabbagh C, Verhaeghe P, Dhahri A, Brehant O, Fuks D, Badaoui R, et al. Two-year results on morbidity, weight loss and quality of life of sleeve gastrectomy as first procedure, sleeve gastrectomy after failure of gastric banding and gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2010;20(6):679–84.
Bernante P, Foletto M, Busetto L, Pomerri F, Pesenti FF, Pelizzo MR, et al. Feasibility of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revision procedure for prior laparoscopic gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2006;16(10):1327–30.
Nocca D, Krawczykowsky D, Bomans B, Noël P, Picot MC, Blanc PM, et al. A prospective multicenter study of 163 sleeve gastrectomies: results at 1 and 2 years. Obes Surg. 2008;18(5):560–5.
Anderson B, Switzer NJ, Almamar A, Shi X, Birch DW, Karmali S. The impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on plasma ghrelin levels: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2013;23(9):1476–80.
Foletto M, Prevedello L, Bernante P, Luca B, Vettor R, Francini-Pesenti F, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure for failed gastric banding or gastroplasty. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(2):146–51.
Uglioni B, Wölnerhanssen B, Peters T, Christoffel-Courtin C, Kern B, Peterli R. Midterm results of primary vs. secondary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as an isolated operation. Obes Surg. 2009;19(4):401–6.
Dapri G, Cadière GB, Himpens J. Feasibility and technique of laparoscopic conversion of adjustable gastric banding to sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(1):72–6.
Frezza EE, la Jaramillo-deTorre EJ, Calleja Enriquez C, Gee L, Wachtel MS, Lopez Corvala JA. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy after gastric banding removal: a feasibility study. Surg Innov. 2009;16(1):68–72.
Alqahtani AR, Elahmedi M, Alamri H, Mohammed R, Darwish F, Ahmed AM. Laparoscopic removal of poor outcome gastric banding with concomitant sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2013;23(6):782–7.
Stroh C, Benedix D, Weiner R, Benedix F, Wolff S, Knoll C, et al. Obesity Surgery Working Group, Competence Network Obesity. Is a one-step sleeve gastrectomy indicated as a revision procedure after gastric banding? Data analysis from a quality assurance study of the surgical treatment of obesity in Germany. Obes Surg. 2014;24(1):9–14.
Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Ragot E, Liagre A, Anduze Y, Msika S, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure for failed gastric banding and vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2009;19(9):1216–20.
Acholonu E, McBean E, Court I, Bellorin O, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional approach for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2009;19(12):1612–6.
Jacobs M, Gomez E, Romero R, Jorge I, Fogel R, Celaya C. Failed restrictive surgery: is sleeve gastrectomy a good revisional procedure? Obes Surg. 2011;21(2):157–60.
Liu KH, Diana M, Vix M, Mutter D, Wu HS, Marescaux J. Revisional surgery after failed adjustable gastric banding: institutional experience with 90 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(11):4044–8.
Utech M, Shaheen H, Halter J, Riege R, Knapp A, Wolf E, et al. Article in German]. [Sleeve gastrectomy as a revision procedure for failed gastric banding. Zentralbl Chir. 2014;139(1):79–82.
Goitein D, Feigin A, Segal-Lieberman G, Goitein O, Papa MZ, Zippel D. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional option after gastric band failure. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(8):2626–30.
Berende CA, de Zoete JP, Smulders JF, Nienhuijs SW. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy feasible for bariatric revision surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22(2):330–4.
Yazbek T, Safa N, Denis R, Atlas H, Garneau PY. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)—a good bariatric option for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): a review of 90 patients. Obes Surg. 2013;23(3):300–5.
Gagnière J, Slim K, Launay-Savary MV, Raspado O, Flamein R, Chipponi J. Previous gastric banding increases morbidity and gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. J Visc Surg. 2011;148(3):e205–9.
Germanova D, Loi P, van Vyve E, Johanet H, Landenne J, Closset J, et al. Previous bariatric surgery increases postoperative morbidity after sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. ActaChir Belg. 2013;113(4):254–7.
Israel A, Sebbag G, Frazer D, Levy I. Nutritional behavior as a predictor of early success after gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2005;15(1):88–94.
Conflict of Interest
This work was not supported by any grant, and all the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guetta, O., Ovnat, A., Shaked, G. et al. Analysis of Morbidity Data of 308 Cases of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy—the Soroka Experience. OBES SURG 25, 2100–2105 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1665-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1665-z