Abstract
The effect of different drying methods on sugar content and amino acid content, color and non-enzymatic browning of Chilean papaya (Vasconcellea pubescens) slices was investigated. The obtained fruit extracts were tested in cell viability assays on human endothelial ECV-304 cells. Drying techniques included freeze-, vacuum-, solar-, convective- and infrared-drying. Consistently, infrared-dried papaya had a lower sugar content and a higher non-enzymatic browning intensity than papaya dehydrated by the other methods. All dried samples were lighter in color with a lower yellow intensity compared to fresh papaya. The amino acid lysine was the most abundant in the infrared-dried sample. On the other side, the methods that employed vacuum, increased their cellular viability. Based on these results, operational parameters during drying processes should be considered to preserve, on one hand, product quality attributes, while, on the other hand, increasing cell viability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Vega-Gálvez, J. Poblete, I. Quispe-Fuentes, E. Uribe, C. Bilbao-Sainz, A. Pastén, J. Food Meas. Charact. 13, 1980–1990 (2019)
C. Gaete-Eastman, C.R. Figueroa, C. Balbontín, M. Moya, R.G. Atkinson, R. Herrera, M.A. Moya-León, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 53, 58–65 (2009)
M.J. Simirgiotis, P.D.S. Caligari, G. Schmeda-Hirschmann, Food Chem. 115, 775–784 (2009)
E. Uribe, A. Delgadillo, C. Giovagnoli-Vicuña, I. Quispe-Fuentes, L. Zura-Bravo, J. Chem. 2015, 1–8 (2015)
C. Balbontín, C. Gaete-Eastman, M. Vergara, R. Herrera, M.A. Moya-León, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 43, 67–77 (2007)
A. Rahmat, R. Rosli, W. Zain, S. Endrini, H. Sani, J. Med. Sci. 2, 55–58 (2002)
T. Nguyen, M.-O. Parat, P. Shaw, A. Hewavitharana, M. Hodson, PLoS ONE 11, e0147956 (2016)
K.S. Alotaibi, H. Li, R. Rafi, R.A. Siddiqui, J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 3, 161–168 (2017)
M.A. Moya-León, M. Moya, R. Herrera, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 34, 211–218 (2004)
P. Udomkun, M. Nagle, D. Argyropoulos, A.N. Wiredu, B. Mahayothee, J. Müller, J. Food Meas. Charact. 11, 2142–2150 (2017)
J.-Y. Yi, J. Lyu, J.-F. Bi, L.-Y. Zhou, M. Zhou, J. Food Process. Preserv. 41, e13300 (2017)
E. Vieira da Silva Junior, L. Lins de Melo, R.A. Batista de Medeiros, Z.M. Pimienra-Barros, P. Moreira-Azoubel, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 97, 317–322 (2018)
W.F. Gomes, F.R.M. Franca, M. Denadai, J.K.S. Andrade, E.M. da Silva Oliveira, E. Sousa de Brito, S. Rodrigues, N. Narain, J. Food Sci. Technol. 55, 2095–2102 (2018)
N. Djendoubi Mrad, N. Boudhrioua, N. Kechaou, F. Courtois, C. Bonazzi, Food Bioprod. Process. 90, 433–441 (2012)
S. Meydav, J. Agric. Food Chem. 25, 602–604 (1977)
J.A. White, R.J. Hart, J.C. Fry, J. Automat. Chem. 8, 170–177 (1986)
N.M. Yartseva, R.F. Fedortseva, Cell Tissue Biol. 2, 428–435 (2008)
P. Udomkun, D. Argyropoulos, M. Nagle, B. Mahayothee, J. Müller, J. Food Eng. 157, 14–23 (2015)
Q. Wang, S. Li, X. Han, Y. Ni, D. Zhao, J. Hao, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 107, 236–242 (2019)
Q.H. Gao, C.S. Wu, M. Wang, B.N. Xu, L.J. Du, J. Agric. Food Chem. 60, 9642–9648 (2012)
S. Kayacan, S. Karasu, P.K. Akman, H. Goktas, I. Doymaz, O. Sagdic, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 118, 108830 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108830
J. Lyu, J. Yi, J.F. Bi, H. Gao, M. Zhou, X. Liu, Int. J. Food Eng. 13, 20160250 (2016)
P. Udomkun, D. Argyropoulos, M. Nagle, B. Mahayothee, A.E. Oladeji, J. Müller, J. Food Meas. Charact. 12, 1028–1037 (2018)
A.M. Ceballos, G.I. Giraldo, C.E. Orrego, J. Food Eng. 111, 360–365 (2012)
M.C. Karam, J. Petit, D. Zimmer, E.B. Djantou, J. Scher, J. Food Eng. 188, 32–49 (2016)
M. Alongi, G. Verardo, A. Gorassini, M. Anese, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 98, 366–371 (2018)
L. Seremet (Ceclu), O.-V. Nistor, D.G. Andronoiu, G.D. Mocanu, V.V. Barbu, A. Maidan, L. Rudi, E. Botez, Food Chem. 310, 125637 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125637
Y. Deng, Y. Wang, J. Yue, Z. Liu, Y. Zheng, B. Qian, Y. Zhong, Y. Zhao, Food Control 36, 102–110 (2014)
Y. Deng, Y. Luo, Y. Wang, Y. Zhao, Food Chem. 171, 168–176 (2015)
D. Virág, A. Kiss, P. Forgó, C. Csutorás, S. Molnár, Microchem. J. 107, 172–177 (2013)
B. Halliwell, FEBS Lett. 540, 3–6 (2003)
T. Yusa, J.D. Crapo, B.A. Freeman, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 798, 167–174 (1984)
B. Halliwell, Nutr. Rev. 57, 104–113 (1999)
B. Halliwell, Lancet 355, 1179–1180 (2000)
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Project FONDECYT 1170601 and DIDULS PT17331 (Dirección de Investigación y Desarrollo de la Universidad de La Serena) for providing financial support for the publication of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vega-Gálvez, A., Uribe, E., Poblete, J. et al. Comparative study of dehydrated papaya (Vasconcellea pubescens) by different drying methods: quality attributes and effects on cells viability. Food Measure 15, 2524–2530 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00845-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00845-6