Advertisement

Fruit quality components of balsam pear (Momordica charantia L.) and soil respiration in response to soil moisture under two soil conditions

  • Xiaojuan An
  • Wenping Li
  • Yinli Liang
  • Lan Mu
  • Tianli Bao
Original Paper
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

Balsam pear (Momordica charantia L.) is an important vegetable reported to have pharmacological properties. It contains abundant bioactive compounds which can be affected by viticulture and environment factors. Identification of the optimal cultivate condition is fundamental to enhance fruit quality components of balsam pear and to decrease carbon dioxide efflux of vegetable garden. The objective of this study was to identify changes of health-promoting bioactive compounds (flavonoids and saponins) and fruit nutritional quality of balsam pear, as well as seasonal variation of soil respiration (Rs) in response to soil moisture under different soil types. A field experiment was conducted using a 3 × 2 factorial involving three levels soil moisture including 50–60% (L), 70–80% (M), and 90–100% (H) of field moisture capacity (FC) under Loessial soil (L) and Cumulic cinnamon soil (C) conditions. The results indicated that moderate soil moisture was benefit for improving quality components, 70–80% FC was benefit for accumulation of health-promoting bioactive compounds on the Cumulic cinnamon soil, and 70–80% FC was benefit for the nutritional quality of fruit on the Loessial soil; soil respiration measured in Loessial soil were always higher than that in Cumulic cinnamon soil. Air temperature, photosynthetic active radiation, soil temperature had positive correlation with Rs to some extent, while air relative humidity had a negative correlation with Rs. This study would be potentially beneficial for efficiently producing functional and high quality balsam pear.

Keywords

Flavonoids Fuzzy membership function Momordica charantia L. Saponins Water deficit 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Science and Technology Support Program (No. 2014B AD14B006) and Science and Technology Program of Shanxi Academy of Science (No. 2014K-03).

References

  1. 1.
    M. Valipour, Variations of land use and irrigation for next decades under different scenarios. Irriga 1, 262–288 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.I. Yannopoulos, G. Lyberatos, N. Theodossiou, W. Li, M. Valipour, A. Tamburrino, A.N. Angelakis, Evolution of Water Lifting Devices (Pumps) over the Centuries Worldwide. Water. 2015, 5031–5060 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Valipour, Evolution of irrigation-equipped areas as share of cultivated areas. Irrigat Drainage Sys. Eng. 2, e114 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Valipour, Land use policy and agricultural water management of the previous half of century in Africa. Appl. Water Sci. 5, 367–395 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Valipour, Use of surface water supply index to assessing of water resources management in Colorado and Oregon, US. Adv. Agric. Sci. Eng. Res. 3, 631–640 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Valipour, Necessity of irrigated and rainfed agriculture in the world. Irrigat Drain. Sys. Eng. S (2013).  https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9768.S9-e001 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L.H. Zhang, Y.N. Chen, R.F. Zhao, W.H. Li, Significance of temperature and soil water content on soil respiration in three desert ecosystems in Northwest China. J. Arid Environ. 74, 1200–1211 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Z.J. Meng, A.W. Duan, Z.G. Liu, J.Y. Zhang, X.M. Bian, The relationship between the change of stem diameter and plant water content of eggplants an experimental study. Acta Ecol. Sin. 26, 2516–2522 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Szakiel, C. Paczkowski, M. Henry, Influence of environmental abiotic factors on the content of saponins in plants. Phytochem. Rev. 10, 471–491 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.Z.E. Jaafar, M.H. Ibrahim, N.F.M. Fakri, Impact of soil field water capacity on secondary metabolites, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), maliondialdehyde (MDA) and photosynthetic responses of malaysian kacip fatimah (Labisia pumila Benth). Molecules 17, 7305–7322 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y.Q. Zhao, C.F. Wu, Establishment and research progress of food pharmacy. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 36, 391–395 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S.P. Tan, T.C. Kha, S.E. Parks, P.D. Roach, Bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.) bioactive composition and health benefits: a review. Food Rev. Int. 32, 181–202 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.K. Grover, S.P. Yadav, Pharmacological actions and potential uses of Momordica charantia: a review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 93, 123–132 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Nagarani, A. Abirami, P. Siddhuraju, Food prospects and nutraceutical attributes of Momordica, species: a potential tropical bioresources—a review. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 3, 117–126 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Mashilo, H. Shimelis, A. Odindo, Yield-based selection indices for drought tolerance evaluation in selected bottle gourd [Lagenariasiceraria (Molina) Standl] landraces. Acta Agric. Scand. B 67, 1–8 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Shan, J.H. Xie, J.H. Zhu, Y. Peng, Ethanol modified supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of flavonoids from Momordica charantia L. and its antioxidant activity. Food Bio Prod. Process. 90, 579–587 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Raina, D. Kumar, R. Agarwal, Promise of bitter melon (Momordica charantia) bioactives in cancer prevention and therapy. Semin. Cancer Biol. 7, 116–129 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. Bao, Y.G. Chen, L. Zhang, Y.L. Na Xu, X. Wang, J. Liu, W. Qu, Momordica charantia (bitter melon) reduces obesity-associated macrophage and mast cell infiltration as well as inflammatory cytokine expression in adipose tissues. Plos ONE 8, 1–13 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Puri, I. Kaur, R.K. Kanwar, R.C. Gupta, A. Chauhan, J.R. Kanwar, Ribosomein activating proteins (RIPs) from Momordica charantia for anti-viral therapy. Curr. Mol. Med. 9, 1080–1094 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    C.A. Pereira, L.L. Oliveira, A.L. Coaglio, L.C. Aytube, S.O. Fernanda, S. Rodolfo, M. Tiago, L.P. Fernando, C. Gustavo, Anti-helminthic activity of Momordica charantia L. against Fasciola hepatica eggs after twelve days of incubation in vitro. Vet Parasitol 228, 160–166 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    S.J. Wu, L.T. Ng, Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of wild bitter melon (Momordica charantia Linn. var. abbreviata Ser.) in Taiwan. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 41, 323–330 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Y. Oishi, T. Sakamoto, H. Udagawa, H. Taniguchi, K. Kobayashi-hattori, Y. Ozawa, T. Takita, Inhibition of increases in blood glucose and serum neutral fat by Momordica charantia saponin fraction. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 71, 735–740 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Z.G. Yang, W.Z. Shi, Z.G. Shen, Y.P. Zhang, J. Yang, Preventive effect of Momordica charantia L. saponins on osteoporosis in ovariectomized rats. Food Sci. 31, 272–275 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A.P. Jayasooriya, M. Sakono, C. Yukizaki, M. Kawano, K. Yamamoto, N. Fukuda, Effects of Momordica charantia powder on serum glucose levels and various lipid parameters in rats fed with cholesterol-free and cholesterol-enriched diets. J. Ethnopharmacol. 72, 331–336 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J.X. Chen, Z.P. Zhang, J.F. Luo, J. Wang, X.W. Ding, Research advances in healthy functions of bitter gourd. J. Food Sci. 33, 271–275 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    P.J. Hanson, N.T. Edwards, C.T. Garten, J.A. Andrews, Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry 48, 115–146 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S.S. Peng, S.L. Piao, T. Wang, J.Y. Sun, Z.H. Shen, Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in different ecosystems in China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 1008–1014 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    E.A. Davidson, E. Belk, R.D. Boone, Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Glob. Change Biol. 4(2), 217–227 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M.B. Lavigne, R.J. Foster, G. Goodine, Seasonal and annual changes in soil respiration in relation to soil temperature, water potential and trenching. Tree Physiol. 24, 415–424 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    X.D. Li, H. Fu, D. Guo, X.D. Li, C.G. Wan, Partitioning soil respiration and assessing the carbon balance in a Setaria italica (L.) Beauv. Cropland on the Loess plateau, Northern China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 337–346 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. Valipour, M.E. Banihabib, S.M.R. Behbahani, Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir. J. Hydrol. 476, 433–441 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    D.P. Viero, M. Valipour, Modeling anisotropy in free-surface overland and shallow inundation flows. Adv. Water Resour. 104, 1–14 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Valipour, Ability of Box-Jenkins Models to Estimate of Reference Potential Evapotranspiration (A Case Study: Mehrabad Synoptic Station, Tehran, Iran). J. Agric. Vet. Sci. 1, 1–11 (2012)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    M. Valipour, How much meteorological information is necessary to achieve reliable accuracy for rainfall estimations? Agriculture 6, 53 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Valipour, A comparison between horizontal and vertical drainage systems (include pipe drainage, open ditch drainage, and pumped wells) in Anisotropic Soils. IOSR J. Mech. Civil Eng. 4, 7–12 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Valipour, M.A.G. Sefidkouhi, M. Raeini – Sarjaz, Selecting the best model to estimate potential evapotranspiration with respect to climate change and magnitudes of extreme events. Agric. Water Mange. 180, 50–60 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    H.H. Li, X.Y. Tian, T.W. Ji, Research advances in evaluation method of vegetables quality. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 37, 5920–5922 (2009)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    X. Wu, K.Y. Wang, X.L. Niu, T.T. Hu, Construction of comprehensive nutritional quality index for tomato and its response to water and fertilizer supply. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 30, 119–127 (2014)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    J.S. Li, R. Yang, X.L. Sui, J.H. Cheng, Q.Q. Cao, S.H. Wang, Analysis and evaluation on nutritive quality indicators of different genotypes radish. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sinica 23, 77–80 (2008)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Z.H. Cheng, H.F. Du, H.W. Meng, P. Zhao, Analysis and assessment of scape nutritive quality of garlic germplasm. Acta Hortic. Sin. 23, 398–400 (1996)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    R. Zeng, Y.L. Liang, X.W. Yao, A.R. Luo, Variation of tomato soil respiration in greenhouse under different soil moisture. J. Irrig. Drain. 30, 111–114 (2011)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    H. Pang, L. Wen, X.P. Wang, L. Li, S.Y. Huang, Study on extracting processing of the total flavanone of bitter melon by ultrasonic wave. J. Trace Elements Health 24, 52–53 (2007)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    H. Qiu, Y.Y. Wei, J.W. Wang, B.P. Wei, K.Y. Cao, J. Wu, Spectrophotometric determination of total saponins from Momorfica Charautia and condition optimization of ultrasonic extraction. Shandong Agric. Sci. 6, 86–89 (2008)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    L. Mu, Y.L. Liang, C.W. Zhang, K.F. Wang, G.H. Shi, Soil respiration of hot pepper, under different mulching practices in a greenhouse, including controlling factors in China. Acta Agric. Scand B 64, 85–95 (2014)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Z.H. Tang, M. Wei, X.G. Chen, X.M. Shi, A.J. Zhang, H.M. Li, Y.F. Ding, Characters and comprehensive evaluation of nutrient quality of sweet potato storage root with different flesh colors. Scientia Agric. Sin. 47, 1705–1714 (2014)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    S.P. Tan, S.E. Parks, C.E. Stathopoulos, R.D. Paul, Greenhouse-grown bitter melon: production and quality characteristics. J. Sci. Food Agric. 94, 1896–1903 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    W.P. Li, Y.L. Liang, T.L. Bao, L. Mu, D.K. Gao, The response of gross flavonoids and saponins for balsam pear fruit and leaf to soil moisture and its correlation analysis. Food Sci. 36, 134–138 (2015)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    T.L. Bao, Y.L. Liang, W.P. Li, L. Mu, D.K. Gao, Effect of soil type on vitamin C content and activities of related enzymes in cherry tomato. Food Sci. 36, 24–28 (2015)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    S. Zhang, L.C. Wang, Influence of straw returning in different ways on soil respiration and crop growth. J. Southwest Univ. (Natural Science Edition) 35, 43–48 (2013)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    J.S. Singh, S.R. Gupta, Plant decomposition and soil respiration in terrestrial ecosystems. Bot. Rev. 43, 449–528 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaojuan An
    • 1
  • Wenping Li
    • 2
  • Yinli Liang
    • 1
  • Lan Mu
    • 3
  • Tianli Bao
    • 1
  1. 1.College of ForestryNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingChina
  2. 2.Management committee of science and technology model garden of vegetable industry, People’s Government of Wushan CountyTianshuiChina
  3. 3.Northwest Historical Environment and Economic and Social Development Research InstituteShaanxi Normal UniversityXianChina

Personalised recommendations