The neural signatures of egocentric bias in normative decision-making
Bargaining parties often disagree on what fair is, due to the reason that people are prone to believe that what favors oneself is fair, i.e., an egocentric bias. In this study, we investigated the neural signatures underlying egocentric bias in fairness decision-making, conjoining an adapted ultimatum game (UG) with event-related fMRI and functional connectivity. Participants earned monetary rewards with a partner in a production stage, wherein their contributions to the earnings were manipulated. Afterwards, the joint earnings were randomly divided, and the distribution was presented simultaneously with contribution information to participants, who accepted/rejected distributions of earnings as the same manner in standard UG. We identified an egocentric bias in fairness decisions, such that participants frequently rejected self-contributed disadvantageous outcomes, but much less so in response to other-contributed advantageous outcomes, although both involved mismatch between contribution and payoff. This bias was underpinned by regions involved in representing fairness norms, including the anterior insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Furthermore, the thalamus activity was predictive of the bias, such that the level of egocentric bias decreased as a function of the activation level of the thalamus. Finally, our functional-connectivity findings indicated that the thalamus worked together with insula and dACC to modulate behavioral egocentric bias in fairness-related decisions. Our findings uncover the neural basis underlying the modulation of egocentric bias in normative decision-making, and highlight the role of neural circuits associated with norm enforcement in this phenomenon.
KeywordsFairness Egocentric bias Self-interest Ultimatum game fMRI Psychophysiological interactions
This study was funded by the Chinese postdoctoral innovation talent support program (BX201600019), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017 M610055),the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Senzhen University (31671169, 31500920, 31300869, 31671169, and 201564/000099), the foundation of the National Key Laboratory of Human Factors Engineering (HF2012-K-03), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BK20130415).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Author Chunliang Feng, Xue Feng, Li Wang, Lili Wang, Ruolei Gu, Aiping Ni, Gopikrishna Deshpande, Zhihao Li, and Yue-Jia Luo declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, and the applicable revisions at the time of the investigation.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects for being included in the study.
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. (2014) 'lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4', R package version, 1(7).Google Scholar
- Civai, C., Miniussi, C. & Rumiati, R. I. (2014) Medial prefrontal cortex reacts to unfairness if this damages the self: a tDCS study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, p. nsu154.Google Scholar
- Corradi-Dell’Acqua, C., Tusche, A., Vuilleumier, P. & Singer, T. (2016) Cross-modal representations of first-hand and vicarious pain, disgust and fairness in insular and cingulate cortex. Nature Communications, 7.Google Scholar
- Eickhoff, S. B., Laird, A. R., Grefkes, C., Wang, L. E., Zilles, K., & Fox, P. T. (2009). Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: A random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Human Brain Mapping, 30(9), 2907–2926.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Eklund, A., Nichols, T. E. & Knutsson, H. (2016) Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, p. 201602413.Google Scholar
- Fatfouta, R., Meshi, D., Merkl, A. & Heekeren, H. R. (2016) Accepting unfairness by a significant other is associated with reduced connectivity between medial prefrontal and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex. Social Neuroscience, 1–13.Google Scholar
- Feng, C., Azarian, B., Ma, Y., Feng, X., Wang, L., Luo, Y. J., & Krueger, F. (2016a). Mortality salience reduces the discrimination between in-group and out-group interactions: A functional MRI investigation using multi-voxel pattern analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 38, 1281–1298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gradin, V., Pérez, A., MacFarlane, J., Cavin, I., Waiter, G., Engelmann, J., Dritschel, B., Pomi, A., Matthews, K., & Steele, J. (2015). Abnormal brain responses to social fairness in depression: An fMRI study using the ultimatum game. Psychological Medicine, 45(06), 1241–1251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu, J., Blue, P., Yu, H., Gong, X., Xiang, Y., Jiang, C. & Zhou, X. (2015) 'Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness', Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, p. nsv086.Google Scholar
- Kriss, P. H., Loewenstein, G., Wang, X., & Weber, R. A. (2011). 'Behind the veil of ignorance: Self-serving bias in climate change negotiations. Judgment and Decision making, 6(7), 602.Google Scholar
- Mumford, J. A. & Poldrack, R. A. (2014) 'Adjusting mean activation for reaction time effects in BOLD fMRI', OHBM poster, https://ww4.aievolution.com/hbm1401/files/content/abstracts/43589/2053_Mumford.pdf.
- Poldrack, R. A., Mumford, J. A., & Nichols, T. E. (2011). Handbook of functional MRI data analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Roalf, D. R. (2010) 'It's not fair!: behavioral and neural evidence that equity influences social economic decisions in healthy older adults', Student Scholar Archive, Paper 516.Google Scholar
- Servaas, M. N., Aleman, A., Marsman, J.-B. C., Renken, R. J., Riese, H. & Ormel, J. (2015) Lower dorsal striatum activation in association with neuroticism during the acceptance of unfair offers. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
- Silani, G., Hartmann, H., Hitz, H., Stepnicka, P. & Lengersdorff, L. (2017) 'Emotional egocentric Bias in autism Spectrum disorder: Behavioral and neurophysiological evidence', Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Verdejo-García, A., Verdejo-Román, J., Rio-Valle, J. S., Lacomba, J. A., Lagos, F. M. & Soriano-Mas, C. (2015a) 'Dysfunctional involvement of emotion and reward brain regions on social decision making in excess weight adolescents', Human Brain Mapping, 36(1), pp. 226–237Google Scholar
- Verdejo-García, A., Verdejo-Román, J., Albein-Urios, N., Martínez-González, J. M. & Soriano-Mas, C. (2015b) Brain substrates of social decision-making in dual diagnosis: cocaine dependence and personality disorders. Addiction Biology.Google Scholar
- White, S. F., Brislin, S. J., Meffert, H., Sinclair, S., & Blair, R. J. R. (2013). Callous-unemotional traits modulate the neural response associated with punishing another individual during social exchange: a preliminary investigation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(1), 99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Wu, Y., Yu, H., Shen, B., Yu, R., Zhou, Z., Zhang, G., Jiang, Y. & Zhou, X. (2014) 'Neural basis of increased costly norm enforcement under adversity', Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Epub ahead of print, p. nst187.Google Scholar
- Zheng, L., Guo, X., Zhu, L., Li, J., Chen, L. & Dienes, Z. (2014) 'Whether Others Were Treated Equally or Not Affects Neural Responses to Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game', Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, epub ahead of print, p. nsu071.Google Scholar