Advertisement

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 19–22 | Cite as

A Critical View of “On TB Vaccines, Patients’ Demands, and Modern Printed Media in Times of Biomedical Uncertainties: Buenos Aires, 1920–1950”

  • Estela B. Quiñones
  • Lucas Goldin
  • Inés M. I. Bignone
  • Roberto A. Diez
Critical Response

Abstract

The putative Pueyo’s vaccine was a commercial venture that obtained marketing authorization in 1946, a turbulent period of Argentine history. After a few months, health authorities withdrew financial support from the state to buy the vaccine and required patients to sign a written consent to receive that product. An independent investigation did not find any evidence of benefit in non-clinical and clinical evaluation of the putative vaccine.

Keywords

Tuberculosis Quackery Pueyo’s vaccine Effective treatment Informed consent Financial support 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Presented as an abstract at the 45th congress of the International Society for the History of Medicine, held in Buenos Aires, September 5–9, 2016. The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research. Partial financial support from Fundación CONAMED.

References

  1. Armus, D. 2016. On TB vaccines, patients’ demands, and modern printed media in times of biomedical uncertainties: Buenos Aires, 1920–1950. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13(1): 35–45.Google Scholar
  2. Bignone I.M.I., and R.A. Diez. 2013. Análisis del marco regulatorio nacional sobre medicamentos en Argentina [Analysis of national regulations for medicines]. PhD Thesis, University of Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  3. Mason P.H., and Degeling C. 2016. Beyond biomedicine: Relationships and care in tuberculosis prevention. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13(1): 31–4.Google Scholar
  4. Pueyo, J. 1947. Yo acuso la burocracia de la medicina contra los tuberculosis [I blame medical bureaucracy against tuberculous patients], 5th ed. Buenos Aires: Editorial Científica.Google Scholar
  5. Rich L.E. 2016. “Born Like This/Into This”: Tuberculosis, justice, and futuristic dinosaurs. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13(1): 1–5.Google Scholar
  6. Sarmiento S.A., C. Ludueña Funes, and P. Manavella. 1947. Estado actual de los conocimientos sobre la vacuna Pueyo. Estudio experimental clínico, radiológico y bacteriológico [Current status of the knowledge about the Pueyo’s vaccine. A clinical, radiological, bacteriologic and experimental study]. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba 5: 313–349.Google Scholar
  7. Vaccarezza R.F., and Raimondi A. 1947. Fístulas broncopleurocutáneas de origen tuberculoso tratadas con éxito por la estreptomicina. Revista de la Asociación Médica Argentina 61(615–616): 713–715.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sección Historia de los Medicamentos, Department of Pharmacology, School of MedicineUniversity of Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations