Risk Analysis of Equipment Failure through Failure Mode and Effect Analysis and Fault Tree Analysis

Abstract

Competitive environment in manufacturing sector cannot afford frequent breakdown of aged critical equipment. In this paper, an attempt is made to develop a method to determine critical equipment with the help of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and occurrence of failure. In this research, the impact of machine breakdown on production, safety, availability of standby, and equipment or asset value is considered with weights of 30, 30, 25, and 15%, respectively. With these factors and corresponding weights, a critical equipment of shop floor is identified. Further, this identified critical equipment is analyzed in detail to determine the highest risk priority number (RPN) of subassembly or component. This high RPN of component or subassembly is reduced with the appropriate maintenance action by determining reliability of each subassembly or component. This approach is useful for the maintenance personnel to plan the maintenance activities and reduce the probability of failures, thereby reducing the machine breakdown.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    C.-C. Chen, A developed autonomous preventive maintenance program using RCA and FMEA. Int. J. Prod. Res. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.775521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    D. Jung, Z. Zhang, M. Winslett, Vibration analysis for IoT enabled predictive maintenance, in 2017 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Data Engineering (2017)

  3. 3.

    R. Ahmad, S. Kamaruddin, I. Azid, I. Almanar, Maintenance management decision model for preventive maintenance strategy on production equipment, J. Ind. Eng. Int. 7(13), ISSN: 1735-5702, 22–34 (2011)

  4. 4.

    E.R. Weishaupt, M.E. Stevenson, J.K. Sprague, Overload fracture of cast aluminum wheel. ASM J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 14(6), 702–706 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    M.C. Eti, S.O.T. Ogaji, S.D. Probert, Integrating reliability, availability, maintainability and supportability with risk analysis for improved operation of the Afam thermal power-station. Appl. Energy. 84, 202–221 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    T.-M. Yeh et al., Preventive maintenance model with FMEA and Monte Carlo simulation for the key equipment in semiconductor foundries. Acad. J. Sci. Res. Essays. 6(26), 5534–5547 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    N.E. Myeda, S.N. Kamaruzzaman, Measuring the performance of office buildings maintenance management in Malaysia. J. Facil. Manag. 9(3), 181–199 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    F. Saleem et al., Overall equipment effectiveness of tyre curing: a case study. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 23(1), 39–56 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/jqme-06-2015-0021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    G. Xu, G.Q. Huang, J. Fang, J. Chen, Cloud based smart asset management for urban flood control. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 11, 719–737 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2015.1086493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries. J. Loss Prev. Ind. 11, 261–277 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    X.-S. Si, W. Wang, C.-H. Hu, D.-H. Zhou, Remaining useful life estimation—a review on the statistical data driven approaches. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 213, 1–14 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    F. Rath, Tools for developing a quality management program: proactive tools (Process Mapping, Value Stream Mapping, Fault tree analysis and Failure mode and effect analysis). Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 71(1), S187–S190 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    M. Shafiee, E. Enjema, A. Kolios, An integrated FTA-FMEA model for risk analysis of engineering systems: a case study of subsea blowout preventers. Appl. Sci. 9, 1192 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    I.H. Afety, Reliability centered maintenance methodology and application: a case study. Sci. Res. Eng. 2, 863–873 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    D.H. Besterfield, Total Quality Management. (Pearson Education Publication, Delhi, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    L.S. Shrinath, Reliability Engineering. (East West Press, New Delhi, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    M.E. Stevenson, M.D. Hayes, J.L. McDougall, S.A. Sanders, Failure analysis of hydraulic fitting brazed connections. ASM J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 12(2), 118–122 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    M.E. Stevenson, M.D. Hayes, D.A. Turnquist, Failure analysis of a glass filled phenolic resin power steering pump pulley. ASM J. Fail. Anal. Prev. (2014)

  19. 19.

    K. Fraser, Maintenance management models—a study of the published literature to identify empirical evidence [A greater practical focus is needed]. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 32(6), 635–664 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    F.L. Cook, Plant maintenance strategy: evidence from four British manufacturing firms. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 9(3), 239–249 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    M.E. Stevenson, D.G. Klepacki, J.L. McDougall, D.E. Alexander, Failure investigation of an aircraft crankshaft gear connection. ASM J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 12(6), 617–622 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    K. Khazraei, J. Deuse, A strategic standpoint on maintenance taxonomy. J. Facil. Manag. 9(2), 96–113 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I am Anand S. Relkar, greatfully thanks to Dr. Dipen Kumar Rajak, Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, at Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre, Nashik for going through the manuscript and provides valuable comments and suggestions for improving the quality of this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anand S. Relkar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables

Table 8 FMEA for STALLON-200 (before)

8 and

Table 9 FMEA for STALLON-200 (after)

9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Relkar, A.S. Risk Analysis of Equipment Failure through Failure Mode and Effect Analysis and Fault Tree Analysis. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-021-01117-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Failure mode and effect analysis
  • Fault tree analysis
  • Maintenance
  • Equipment performance
  • Risk priority number
  • Criticality analysis