Skip to main content
Log in

An Extended FMECA Method and Its Fuzzy Assessment Model for Equipment Maintenance Management Optimization

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The failure mode, effect and criticality analysis (FMECA) is a famous bottom-up analytical method for quantifying and ranking critical failures of a product normally at its design stage. At present, as the importance of equipment maintenance increases in industry, FMECA is often applied in maintenance management. In practical cases, equipment is composed of different components, and its maintenance optimization should consider requirements of reliability, availability and costs together. This paper proposes the method called the extended failure mode, effect and criticality analysis (e-FMECA) for equipment maintenance management optimization on the basis of the FMECA theory. This method gives the procedure of analyzing the risks of different failure modes associated with reliability, availability and maintenance costs of equipment. In order to measure these risks of reliability, availability and maintenance costs quantitatively, a fuzzy risk priority method for e-FMECA is developed. Finally, the case study of the e-FMECA method in terms of metro rolling stocks is given. The proposed e-FMECA might be beneficial for selecting the maintenance strategies, maintenance polices and maintenance optimizing objects for maintenance management optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Dekker, Applications of maintenance optimization models: a review and analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 51, 229–240 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bevilacqua, M. Braglia, The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 70, 71–83 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Chang, L. Li, Study of Tianjin metro ticket pricing based on Ramsey pricing model. Railway Eng. Cost Manag. 22(6), 12–17 (2007). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Bertling, R. Allan, R. Eriksson, A reliability-centered asset maintenance method for assessing the impact of maintenance in power distribution systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20(1), 75–82 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Jia, The decision models for reliability-centered maintenance (National Defense Industrial Press, Beijing, 2007). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Carmignani, An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: the priority-cost FMECA. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94, 861–871 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N.R. Sankar, B.S. Prabhu, Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 18(3), 324–335 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S.M. Seyed-Hosseini, N. Safaei, M.J. Asgharpour, Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 872–881 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Franceschini, M. Galetto, A new approach for evaluation of risk priorities of failure modes in FMEA. Int. J. Prod. Res. 39, 2991–3002 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Puente, R. Pino, P. Priore, D. de la Fuente, A decision support system for applying failure mode and effects analysis. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 19, 137–150 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Y.S. Lee, D.J. Kim, J.O. Kim, H. Kim, New FMECA methodology using structural importance and fuzzy theory. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26(4), 2364–2370 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Li, C. Qiu, Application of fuzzy FMECA in analysis of hydraulic system reliability. Hydraul. Pneum. Seals 1, 38–42 (2012). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Braglia, M. Frosolini, R. Montanari, Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 20(4), 503–524 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y.-M. Wang, K.-S. Chin, G.K.K. Poon, J.-B. Yang, Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 1195–1207 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A.C. Kutlu, M. Ekmek Cioglu, Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(1), 61–67 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Wang, J. Chu, J. Wu, Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 104, 151–163 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Ran, The research of the rank of triangular fuzzy numbers. J. Cent. Univ. Natl. 20(4), 37–42 (2011). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The research work described in this paper was supported by the Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project of Zhejiang Province Science and Technology Department (LGG18F030010), Research Project of Education Department of Zhejiang Province (Y201839978), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51504228, 51575503).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Gao, Y., Xu, W. et al. An Extended FMECA Method and Its Fuzzy Assessment Model for Equipment Maintenance Management Optimization. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 19, 350–360 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-019-00611-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-019-00611-3

Keywords

Navigation