Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 526–537 | Cite as

Texture Analysis for Crack Detection in Fracture Mechanics

  • Fernando A. Fardo
  • Gustavo H. B. Donato
  • Paulo S. Rodrigues
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed


In the context of the metal-mechanic industry, there is a strong demand for material behavior measuring methods in the presence of cracks under stress conditions. This behavior is usually quantified by means of fracture toughness tests using parameters such as the stress intensity factor K, the CTOD, or the J integral. Regardless of the parameters used to quantify fracture toughness, all tests require knowledge of the correct length of the existing fatigue pre-crack in the sample that generated the failure. Hence, most laboratories have adopted visual measurement methods using a stereoscopic magnifying glass or a profile projector. Additional techniques, such as the use of heat tinting, help users and researchers to visualize the stable crack growth front. With the improvement in image processing and computer vision techniques, the present paper proposes the application of a new method for border detection by texture analysis, in order to get the corresponding contour of the crack front in postmortem analyses of SE(B) samples with high precision. The results suggest that the proposed method could be applied with high precision to images of fracture toughness tests for crack length measurement, having achieved a discrimination rate of 98%. The results also suggest that the method can be applied to samples that have not undergone heat tinting.


Crack Fracture Texture LBP SVR 


  1. 1.
    ASTM Standard, ASTM E1820—Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness (2013), p. 54Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T.L. Anderson, Fracture Mechanics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.C. Barbosa, G.H.B. Donato, Development and experimental validation of algorithm for fatigue pre-crack and crack growth measurement using digital image analysis. Tecnol. Metal. Mater. Miner. 20110718, 2335–2347 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    British Standard Institution, BS 7448-4—Fracture Mechanics Toughness Tests. Method for Determination of Fracture Resistance Curves and Initiation Values for Stable Crack Extension in Metallic Materials (1997), p. 24Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.P. de Albuquerque, I.A. Esquef, A.R.G. Mello, Image thresholding using tsallis entropy. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 25(9), 1059–1065 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.C. Gonzalez, R.E. Woods, Digital Image Processing (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.C. He, L. Wang, Simplified texture spectrum for texture analysis. J. Commun. Comput. 7(8), 44–53 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Ojala, M. Pietikainen, D. Harwood. Performance evaluation of texture measures with classification based on Kullback discrimination of distributions. In Proceedings of the 12th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 1994. Conference A: Computer Vision & Image Processing, vol 1, (1994) pp. 582–585Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Ojala, M. Pietikainen, T. Maenpaa, Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(7), 971–987 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Otsu, A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Automatica 11(285–296), 23–27 (1975)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Scholkopf, A. Smola, K.-R. Muller, C. Burges, V. Vapnik, Support vector methods in learning and feature extraction, in Proceedings of the Ninth Australian Congress on Neural Networks, ed. by T. Down, M. Frean, M. Gallagher (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Smola, V. Vapnik, Support vector regression machines. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 9, 155–161 (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. Vapnik, Pattern recognition using generalized portrait method. Autom. Remote Control 24, 774–780 (1963)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando A. Fardo
    • 1
  • Gustavo H. B. Donato
    • 2
  • Paulo S. Rodrigues
    • 1
  1. 1.Electrical Engineering DepartmentCentro Universitário da FEISão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentCentro Universitário da FEISão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations