Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 315–321 | Cite as

Investigation of an Optimum Concentration for Nano-Silica Used as an Adhesive Bonding Strength Enhancer

  • Soran Hassanifard
  • Bahman Paygozar
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed


In this paper, the effect of silica nanoparticles (nano-silica) on the bonding strength of reinforced adhesive joints was experimentally studied in five concentrations. A two-part epoxy-based adhesive (Araldite 2015) was used to bond the adherends as well as silica nanoparticles for strengthening purposes. Nano-silica was added into the adhesive by 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 and 3 wt.%. Some adhesive joints with and without nanoparticles were tested under uniaxial loading to obtain their bonding strength. The results showed that the change in the bonding strength is a function of nanoparticles concentration. Furthermore, it was concluded that the addition of silica nanoparticles has a suitable effect on the joint strength at an optimum point, in which the joint strength takes its maximum value, and a further increase in the nanoparticles weight fraction causes the joint strength to decrease.


Adhesive joints Bonding strength Silica nanoparticles Optimum concentration 


  1. 1.
    R.D. Adams, N.A. Peppiatt, Stress analysis of adhesive-bonded lap joints. J. Strain Anal. 9(3), 185–196 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.H. Tang, I. Sridhar, N. Srikanth, Static and fatigue failure analysis of adhesively bonded thick composite single lap joints. Compos. Sci. Technol. 86, 18–25 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.C. Wake, Adhesion and adhesives: science and technology A. J. Kinloch, Chapman and Hall, London, 1987. pp. xii + 441, price £35.00. ISBN 0-412-27440-X. Br. Polym. J. 20(3), 300 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Quaresimin, M. Ricotta, Fatigue behaviour and damage evolution of single lap bonded joints in composite material. Compos. Sci. Technol. 66(2), 176–187 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.M.R. Khalili, S. Khalili, M.R. Pirouzhashemi, A. Shokuhfar, R.K. Mittal, Numerical study of lap joints with composite adhesives and composite adherends subjected to in-plane and transverse loads. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 28(8), 411–418 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.S. Subramanian, J.N. Tey, L. Zhang, B.H. Ng, S. Roy, J. Wei, X.M. Hu, Synergistic bond strengthening in epoxy adhesives using polydopamine/MWCNT hybrids. Polymer 82, 285–294 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    V.K. Srivastava, Effect of carbon nanotubes on the strength of adhesive lap joints of C/C and C/C–SiC ceramic fibre composites. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 31(6), 486–489 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Z. Wang, Z. Gu, Y. Hong, L. Cheng, Z. Li, Bonding strength and water resistance of starch-based wood adhesive improved by silica nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 86(1), 72–76 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.A. Nassar, Z. Wu, K. Moustafa, D. Tzelepis, Effect of adhesive nanoparticle enrichment on static load transfer capacity and failure mode of bonded steel–magnesium single lap joints. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 137(5), 051024–051026 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P.K. Ghosh, A. Patel, K. Kumar, Adhesive joining of copper using nano-filler composite adhesive. Polymer 87, 159–169 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.J. Kinloch, R.D. Mohammed, A.C. Taylor, C. Eger, S. Sprenger, D. Egan, The effect of silica nano particles and rubber particles on the toughness of multiphase thermosetting epoxy polymers. J. Mater. Sci. 41(4), 1293 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    X.-L. Xie, Y.-W. Mai, X.-P. Zhou, Dispersion and alignment of carbon nanotubes in polymer matrix: a review. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 49(4), 89–112 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.C. Zunjarrao, R. Sriraman, R.P. Singh, Effect of processing parameters and clay volume fraction on the mechanical properties of epoxy-clay nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 41(8), 2219–2228 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.J. Barbero, Introduction to Composite Materials Design, 2nd edn. (Taylor & Francis, London, 2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.D.S.G. Campilho, M.D. Banea, J.A.B.P. Neto, L.F.M. da Silva, Modelling of single-lap joints using cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive parameters on the output of the simulations. J. Adhes. 88(4–6), 513–533 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.L. Vijaya Kumar, M.R. Bhat, C.R.L. Murthy, Evaluation of kissing bond in composite adhesive lap joints using digital image correlation: preliminary studies. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 42, 60–68 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Jia-Hu, L. Yu-Cun, C. Tao, J. Su-Ming, M. Hui, Q. Ning, Z. Hua, Y. Tao, H. Wei-Ming, Synthesis and properties of nano-silica modified environmentally friendly polyurethane adhesive. RSC Adv. 5, 44990–44997 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations