Root Cause Failure Analysis of a Domestic Pressure Cooker Through Metallurgical Characterization and Computational Simulation
- 111 Downloads
Pressure cooker is a closed domestic pressure cooking vessel for use with external heat source and capable of maintaining nominal cooking pressure up to 1.0 kgf/cm2 (100 kN/m2 approximately) gauge nominal. In pressure cookers, despite the development of electronic controllers, the basic edition of such vessels are still equipped with fewer advanced safety functions due to economic constraints. Although the provision of pressure relief valves (PRV) is considered as one of the major protective features, however, pressure cooker failure accidents have been reported frequently. This paper describes the analysis of pressure cooker failure that failed prematurely after 1 year of service considering the design life of > 5 years. It was hypothesized that the root cause of pipe failure was either material degradation from exposure to an aggressive environment or an inherent defect in the pressure cooker. To test this hypothesis, a thorough visual examination of the exhumed failed section and the fracture surface was undertaken, followed by liquid penetrant testing, material identification, hardness testing, and metallographic analysis. Computational models of static and transient loading were also used to determine the stress distribution along the actual geometry of the failed cooker and to understand the main causes of recurrent failures. Visual and macroscale examination revealed significant body deformation at the lower dish-ended shell showing distorted locking grooves. It was also noticed that dirt and food particle, from the earlier cooking, were stuck in the pressure valves orifice. In addition, no evidence of metallurgical defect was observed. The inspection indicated that the cause of failure is primarily due to the choking of pressure relief value (PRV) and overpressure safety valves. Consequently, the pressure release occurred from the sealing side of the top lid, which resulted in its ejection.
KeywordsFailure analysis Pressure cooker NDT (nondestructive techniques) PRV chocking Computational simulation
The authors acknowledge the support and are most grateful of UTM, Malaysia, and HITEC University, Pakistan, for their significant efforts and commitments in conducting experiments throughout research period.
- 1.C. Randall, Multi-purpose stovetop grilling and cooking device, U.S. Patent No. 7,059,318 (2006)Google Scholar
- 2.P. Roussard, U.S. Patent No. D413, 483. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC (1999)Google Scholar
- 3.F. Wagner, U.S. Patent No. D156, 298. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC (1949)Google Scholar
- 4.W.J. Jung, K.H. Kim, U.S. Patent No. D489, 223. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.Three Generations of Electric Pressure Cookers. http://en.huarenstore.com/blogging/?p=988. Accessed 1 Feb 2015
- 6.Cookware and Cooking Utensils. https://dir.indiamart.com. Accessed 23 Mar 2015
- 7.Science of pressure cooking (1999). http://www.scienceofcooking.com/science_of_pressure_cooking.htm. Accessed 6 May 2015
- 8.What’s the Best Electric Pressure Cooker?: “a third generation model for 21st century lifestyle.” https://www.bestreviews.com. Accessed 3 June 2014
- 9.A. Jacket, Sheets, E. Aluminum. Comply with ASTM B 209 Alloy 3003. H14 temper. (2007)Google Scholar
- 10.Y.A. Cengel, S. Klein, W. Beckman, Heat Transfer: A Practical Approach, vol. 141 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998)Google Scholar
- 11.V. Tvergaard, Material failure by void growth to coalescence. Adv. Appl. Mech. 27(1), 83–151 (1990)Google Scholar