Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chemical Accident Simulation Tool (CAST): A System for Assessing Consequences of Accidents in Chemical Process Industry

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development and validation of a new software named chemical accident simulation tool (CAST) is presented. CAST enables development of scenarios of different types of accidental fires and explosions that can occur in chemical process industry (CPI). CAST is also capable of assessing the likely consequences of such accidents in terms of the area impacted and the types of impacts. The distinguishing features of CAST are (a) it incorporates a larger set of established models than handled by existing packages to simulate a wider variety of accidents in CPI; (b) it is developed with an integrated mapping tool to display damage zones around accident center; this makes the application useful in decision making; and (c) it calculates the results in a fast and reliable manner. Due to these attributes, CAST has increased efficiency, better understanding of the accident scenarios, and better communication of results. Validation of the software has been done with published results which shows that the codes for calculating the impacts from accidents are correct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, The expertise and the practice of loss prevention in the Indian process industry. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 83(B5), 413–420 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, The boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE): mechanism, consequence assessment, control. J. Hazard. Mater. 141, 489–519 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Dust explosions: cases, causes, consequence, control. J. Hazard. Mater. 140, 7–44 (2007)  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, The boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE) is fifty… and lives on! J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 21, 485–487 (2008)  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Abbasi, E.V. Ramasamy, F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Regional EIA and Risk Assessment in a Fast Developing Country (Nova Science, New York, 2013), p. x+433. ISBN 978-1-61942-234-6

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Abdolhamidzadeh, T. Abbasi, D. Rashtchian, S.A. Abbasi, A new method for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry. J. Hazard. Mater. 182, 416–426 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Abdolhamidzadeh, D. Rashtchian, T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Domino effect in process-industry accidents—an inventory of past events and identification of some patterns. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24(5), 575–593 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V. Babrauskas, Free burning fires. Fire Saf. J. 11(1–2), 33–51 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. W.E. Baker, P.A. Cox, P.S. Westine, J.J. Kulesz, R.A. Strehlow, Explosion Hazards and Evaluation (Elsevier, New York, 1983)

  10. Q.A. Baker, M.J. Tang, E.A. Scheier, G.J. Silva, Vapor cloud explosion analysis. Process Saf. Prog. 15(2), 106–109 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D.A. Carter, Aspects of risk assessment for hazardous pipelines containing flammable substances. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 4(2), 68–72 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W. Carter, Condensed atmospheric photooxidation mechanisms for isoprene. Atmos. Environ. 30, 4275–4290 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. CCPS, Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Consequence Analysis of Chemical Releases (American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1995). ISBN 978-0-8169-0786-1

    Google Scholar 

  14. CCPS, Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, 2nd edn. (American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1999). ISBN 978-0-8169-0720-5

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Chamberlain, Asymptotic efficiency in estimation with conditional moment restrictions. J. Econom. 34, 305–334 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G.A. Clay, R.R.D. Fitzpatick, N.W. Hurst, D.A. Carter, P.J. Crossthwaite, Risk assessment for installation where liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is stored in bulk vessels above ground, J. Hazard. Mater. 20, 357 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. N.A. Eisenberg, et al., Vulnerability Model: A Simulation System for Assessing Damage Resulting from Marine Spills (VM1), ADA-0150245, Coast Guard NTIS Report No. CG-D-137-75 (1975)

  18. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Accident hazard index; a multi-attribute method for process industry hazard rating. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 75, 217–224 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, OptHAZOP—an effective and optimal methodology for conducting HAZOP, study. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 10, 191–204 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, TOPHAZOP: a knowledge—based software. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 10, 333–343 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Techniques and Methodologies for Risk Analysis in Chemical Process Industries (Discovery Publishing House, New Delhi, 1998), p. ix+364

    Google Scholar 

  22. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, DOMIEFECT: (DoMIno eFFECT) a user-friendly software for domino effect-analysis. Environ. Model Softw. 13, 163–177 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Models for domino effect analysis in process industries. Process Saf. Prog. 17, 107–123 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Multivariate hazard identification and ranking system. Process Saf. Prog. 17, 157–170 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, MAXCRED—a new software package for rapid risk assessment in chemical process industries. Environ. Model. Softw. 14, 11–25 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, The worst chemical industry accident of 1990s: what happened and what might have been—a quantitative study. Process Saf. Prog. 18, 135–145 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Estimation of probabilities and likely consequences of a chain of accidents (domino effect) in Manali Industrial Complex. J. Clean. Prod. 9, 493–508 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence, and the damage potential of domino effect in a typical cluster of industries. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 14, 283–306 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, SWEHI a new user-friendly tool for swift yet comprehensive hazard identification and safety evaluation. Trans IChemE, (UK) 79(B), 65–80 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, A new methodology for safety management: SCAP. J. Hazard. Mater. A87, 23–56 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, A criteria for developing credible accident scenarios for risk assessment. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 15, 467–475 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. F.P. Lees, Lee’s Loss Prevention in the Process Industries: Hazard Identification, Assessment, and Control, 3rd edn. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. R.W. Prugh, Quantitative evaluation of” Bleve” hazards. J. Fire Prot. Eng. 3(1), 9–24 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. P.J. Rew, H. Spencer, J. Daycock, Off-site ignition probability of flammable gases. J. Hazard. Mater. 71(1), 409–422 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Risks of fire and explosion associated with the increasing use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 10(4), 322–333 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Development of a new chemical process-industry accident database to assist in past accident analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24, 426–431 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. S.M. Tauseef, D. Rashtchian, S.A. Abbasi, A method for simulation of vapour cloud explosions based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD). J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24, 638–647 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, R. Suganya, S.A. Abbasi, A critical assessment of available software for forecasting the impact of accidents in chemical process industry. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Math. 6(7), 269–289 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  39. TNO, Green Book: Methods for the Determination of Possible Damage to People and Objects Resulting from Release of Hazardous Materials, Report CPR 16E (TNO, The Hague, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  40. A.C. Van den Berg, The multi-energy method: a framework for vapour cloud explosion blast prediction. J. Hazard. Mater. 12(1), 1–10 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. S. Vasanth, S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Assessment of four turbulence models in simulation of large-scale pool fires in the presence of wind using computational fluid dynamics. J. Less Prev. Process Ind. 26, 1071–1084 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. L.J. White, The Automobile Industry since 1945 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1971)

Download references

Acknowledgments

SAA thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, for the Emeritus Scientist Grant (21(1034)/16/EMR-II).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tasneem Abbasi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tauseef, S.M., Suganya, R., Abbasi, T. et al. Chemical Accident Simulation Tool (CAST): A System for Assessing Consequences of Accidents in Chemical Process Industry. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 18, 101–116 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-018-0386-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-018-0386-8

Keywords

Navigation