Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 101–116 | Cite as

Chemical Accident Simulation Tool (CAST): A System for Assessing Consequences of Accidents in Chemical Process Industry

  • S. M. Tauseef
  • R. Suganya
  • Tasneem Abbasi
  • S. A. Abbasi
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed

Abstract

The development and validation of a new software named chemical accident simulation tool (CAST) is presented. CAST enables development of scenarios of different types of accidental fires and explosions that can occur in chemical process industry (CPI). CAST is also capable of assessing the likely consequences of such accidents in terms of the area impacted and the types of impacts. The distinguishing features of CAST are (a) it incorporates a larger set of established models than handled by existing packages to simulate a wider variety of accidents in CPI; (b) it is developed with an integrated mapping tool to display damage zones around accident center; this makes the application useful in decision making; and (c) it calculates the results in a fast and reliable manner. Due to these attributes, CAST has increased efficiency, better understanding of the accident scenarios, and better communication of results. Validation of the software has been done with published results which shows that the codes for calculating the impacts from accidents are correct.

Keywords

Chemical process industry Explosion Fire Accident scenarios Consequence assessment Accident simulation tool 

Notes

Acknowledgments

SAA thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, for the Emeritus Scientist Grant (21(1034)/16/EMR-II).

References

  1. 1.
    T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, The expertise and the practice of loss prevention in the Indian process industry. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 83(B5), 413–420 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, The boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE): mechanism, consequence assessment, control. J. Hazard. Mater. 141, 489–519 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Dust explosions: cases, causes, consequence, control. J. Hazard. Mater. 140, 7–44 (2007)  CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, The boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE) is fifty… and lives on! J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 21, 485–487 (2008)  CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Abbasi, E.V. Ramasamy, F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Regional EIA and Risk Assessment in a Fast Developing Country (Nova Science, New York, 2013), p. x+433. ISBN 978-1-61942-234-6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Abdolhamidzadeh, T. Abbasi, D. Rashtchian, S.A. Abbasi, A new method for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry. J. Hazard. Mater. 182, 416–426 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Abdolhamidzadeh, D. Rashtchian, T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Domino effect in process-industry accidents—an inventory of past events and identification of some patterns. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24(5), 575–593 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Babrauskas, Free burning fires. Fire Saf. J. 11(1–2), 33–51 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.E. Baker, P.A. Cox, P.S. Westine, J.J. Kulesz, R.A. Strehlow, Explosion Hazards and Evaluation (Elsevier, New York, 1983)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Q.A. Baker, M.J. Tang, E.A. Scheier, G.J. Silva, Vapor cloud explosion analysis. Process Saf. Prog. 15(2), 106–109 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.A. Carter, Aspects of risk assessment for hazardous pipelines containing flammable substances. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 4(2), 68–72 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Carter, Condensed atmospheric photooxidation mechanisms for isoprene. Atmos. Environ. 30, 4275–4290 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    CCPS, Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Consequence Analysis of Chemical Releases (American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1995). ISBN 978-0-8169-0786-1Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    CCPS, Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, 2nd edn. (American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1999). ISBN 978-0-8169-0720-5Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Chamberlain, Asymptotic efficiency in estimation with conditional moment restrictions. J. Econom. 34, 305–334 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G.A. Clay, R.R.D. Fitzpatick, N.W. Hurst, D.A. Carter, P.J. Crossthwaite, Risk assessment for installation where liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is stored in bulk vessels above ground, J. Hazard. Mater. 20, 357 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N.A. Eisenberg, et al., Vulnerability Model: A Simulation System for Assessing Damage Resulting from Marine Spills (VM1), ADA-0150245, Coast Guard NTIS Report No. CG-D-137-75 (1975)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Accident hazard index; a multi-attribute method for process industry hazard rating. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 75, 217–224 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, OptHAZOP—an effective and optimal methodology for conducting HAZOP, study. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 10, 191–204 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, TOPHAZOP: a knowledge—based software. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 10, 333–343 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Techniques and Methodologies for Risk Analysis in Chemical Process Industries (Discovery Publishing House, New Delhi, 1998), p. ix+364Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, DOMIEFECT: (DoMIno eFFECT) a user-friendly software for domino effect-analysis. Environ. Model Softw. 13, 163–177 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Models for domino effect analysis in process industries. Process Saf. Prog. 17, 107–123 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Multivariate hazard identification and ranking system. Process Saf. Prog. 17, 157–170 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, MAXCRED—a new software package for rapid risk assessment in chemical process industries. Environ. Model. Softw. 14, 11–25 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, The worst chemical industry accident of 1990s: what happened and what might have been—a quantitative study. Process Saf. Prog. 18, 135–145 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Estimation of probabilities and likely consequences of a chain of accidents (domino effect) in Manali Industrial Complex. J. Clean. Prod. 9, 493–508 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence, and the damage potential of domino effect in a typical cluster of industries. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 14, 283–306 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, SWEHI a new user-friendly tool for swift yet comprehensive hazard identification and safety evaluation. Trans IChemE, (UK) 79(B), 65–80 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, A new methodology for safety management: SCAP. J. Hazard. Mater. A87, 23–56 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, A criteria for developing credible accident scenarios for risk assessment. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 15, 467–475 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    F.P. Lees, Lee’s Loss Prevention in the Process Industries: Hazard Identification, Assessment, and Control, 3rd edn. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    R.W. Prugh, Quantitative evaluation of” Bleve” hazards. J. Fire Prot. Eng. 3(1), 9–24 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    P.J. Rew, H. Spencer, J. Daycock, Off-site ignition probability of flammable gases. J. Hazard. Mater. 71(1), 409–422 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Risks of fire and explosion associated with the increasing use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 10(4), 322–333 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Development of a new chemical process-industry accident database to assist in past accident analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24, 426–431 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    S.M. Tauseef, D. Rashtchian, S.A. Abbasi, A method for simulation of vapour cloud explosions based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD). J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24, 638–647 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, R. Suganya, S.A. Abbasi, A critical assessment of available software for forecasting the impact of accidents in chemical process industry. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Math. 6(7), 269–289 (2017)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    TNO, Green Book: Methods for the Determination of Possible Damage to People and Objects Resulting from Release of Hazardous Materials, Report CPR 16E (TNO, The Hague, 1992)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    A.C. Van den Berg, The multi-energy method: a framework for vapour cloud explosion blast prediction. J. Hazard. Mater. 12(1), 1–10 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    S. Vasanth, S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Assessment of four turbulence models in simulation of large-scale pool fires in the presence of wind using computational fluid dynamics. J. Less Prev. Process Ind. 26, 1071–1084 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    L.J. White, The Automobile Industry since 1945 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1971)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Tauseef
    • 1
  • R. Suganya
    • 2
  • Tasneem Abbasi
    • 2
  • S. A. Abbasi
    • 2
  1. 1.Environmental Research InstituteUniversity of Petroleum and Energy StudiesDehradunIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Pollution Control and Environmental EngineeringPondicherry UniversityPuducherryIndia

Personalised recommendations