Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 83–91 | Cite as

A New Method for Siting Hazardous Units in Chemical Process Facilities Which Minimizes Risk at Least Cost: RIDIMPUS

  • A. Basheer
  • S. M. Tauseef
  • Tasneem Abbasi
  • S. A. Abbasi
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

A new method, RIsk and DIstance Minimization in Process Units Siting (RIDIMPUS), is presented with which hazardous units can be sited in a chemical process facility in a manner that the risk of accidents involving the hazardous units as also the cost of spacing the units is minimized. To achieve this, safety and cost factors were modeled using various governing parameters and then expressions were designed to integrate the safety and the economic concerns to form model equations, inequalities and disjunctions. The resulting nonlinear programming model is solvable by using algorithms and solvers on any common desktop computer, thereby providing an optimal and prompt solution.

Keywords

Hazardous chemicals Fire Explosion Siting Risk–cost optimization 

Notes

Acknowledgment

SAA thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, for the Emeritus Scientist Grant (21(1034)/16/EMR-II).

References

  1. 1.
    T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, The expertise and the practice of loss prevention in the Indian process industry. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 83(B5), 413–420 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, The boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE): mechanism, consequence assessment, control. J. Hazard. Mater. 141, 489–519 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Accidental risk of superheated liquids and a framework for predicting the superheat limit. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 20, 165–181 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Dust explosions: cases, causes, consequence, control. J. Hazard. Mater. 140, 7–44 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, The boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE) is fifty… and lives on! J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 21, 485–487 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Abbasi, H. Pasman, S.A. Abbasi, A scheme for the classification of explosions in the chemical process industry. J. Hazard. Mater. 174, 270–280 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Abbasi, E.V. Ramasamy, F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Regional EIA and Risk Assessment in a Fast Developing Country (Nova Science, New York, 2013). ISBN 978-1-61942-234-6Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Abdolhamidzadeh, T. Abbasi, D. Rashtchian, S.A. Abbasi, A new method for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry. J. Hazard. Mater. 182, 416–426 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Abdolhamidzadeh, D. Rashtchian, T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Domino effect in process-industry accidents—an inventory of past events and identification of some patterns. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24(5), 575–593 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Antonioni, G. Spadoni, V. Cozzani, Application of domino effect quantitative risk assessment to an extended industrial area. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22(5), 614–624 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    BP (Firm), Fatal Accident Investigation Report, Isomerization Unit Explosion Final Report, Texas City, Texas, USA (British Petroleum, London, 2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Basheer, S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Methodologies for assessing risks of accidents in chemical process industries. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manage. (2017, communicated)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buncefield incident, 11 December 2005: the final report of the Major Incident Investigation Board. Health and Safety Executive, 2008Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    CCPS, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis (Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Hoboken, 1992)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    CCPS, Guidelines for Investigating Chemical Process Incidents, 2nd edn. (Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 2003). ISBN 0-8169-0897-4Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    CCPS, Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety (Center for Chemical Process Safety American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 2007). ISBN 978-0-470-16569-0Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Daily mail, Half a million people evacuated as deadly fire rages through Jaipur oil depot, London: Dailymail.co.uk. 1 November 2009Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    N.S. Georgiadis, C.D. Terzidou, A.S. Dimitriadis, Coralline hydroxyapatite sphere in orbit restoration. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 9(4), 302–308 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Holmstrom, F. Altamirano, J. Banks, G. Joseph, M. Kaszniak, C. Mackenzie, S. Wallace, CSB investigation of the explosions and fire at the BP Texas City refinery on March 23, 2005. Process Saf. Prog. 25(4), 345–349 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D.M. Johnson, The potential for vapour cloud explosions–Lessons from the Buncefield accident. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23(6), 921–927 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Jung, D. Ng, C.D. Laird, M.S. Mannan, A new approach for facility siting using mapping risks on a plant grid area and optimization. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23(6), 824–830 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Accident hazard index; A multi-attribute method for process industry hazard rating. Process saf. Environ. Prot. 75, 217–224 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, OptHAZOP – an effective and optimal methodology for conducting HAZOP, study. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 10, 191–204 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, TOPHAZOP: a knowledge—based software. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. (Elsevier) 10, 333–343 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Techniques and Methodologies for Risk Analysis in Chemical Process Industries (Discovery Publishing House, New Delhi, 1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, DOMIEFECT: (DoMIno eFFECT) a user-friendly software for domino effect-analysis. Environ. Model Softw. 13, 163–177 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Models for domino effect analysis in process industries. Process Saf. Prog. 17, 107–123 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Multivariate hazard identification and ranking system. Process Saf. Prog. 17, 157–170 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, MAXCRED—a new software package for rapid risk assessment in chemical process industries. Environ. Model. Softw. 14, 11–25 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, The worst chemical industry accident of 1990s: what happened and what might have been—a quantitative study. Process Saf. Prog. 18, 135–145 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Estimation of probabilities and likely consequences of a chain of accidents (domino effect) in Manali Industrial Complex. J. Clean. Prod. 9, 493–508 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence, and the damage potential of domino effect in a typical cluster of industries. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 14, 283–306 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, SWEHI a new user-friendly tool for swift yet comprehensive hazard identification and safety evaluation. Trans IChemE 79(2), 65–80 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, A new methodology for safety management: SCAP. J. Hazard. Mater. A87, 23–56 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    F.I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, A criteria for developing credible accident scenarios for risk assessment. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 15, 467–475 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    M.S. Mannan, H.H. West, P.C. Berwanger, Lessons learned from recent incidents: facility siting, atmospheric venting, and operator information systems. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 20, 644–650 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    S. Mannan, Lees’ Loss Prevention in the Process Industries: Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control (Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam, 2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    J.C. Mecklenburgh, Process Plant Layout (Wiley, New York, 1985)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Z. Mingguang, J. Juncheng, An improved probit method for assessment of domino effect to chemical process equipment caused by overpressure. J. Hazard. Mater. 158(23), 280–286 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    K.B. Mishra, K.D. Wehrstedt, H. Krebs, Lessons learned from recent fuel storage fires. Fuel Process. Technol. 107, 166–172 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    D.I. Patsiatzis, G. Knight, L.G. Papageorgiou, An MILP approach to safe process plant layout. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 82(5), 579–586 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    F.D. Penteado, A.R. Ciric, An MINLP approach for safe process plant layout. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35(4), 1354–1361 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    M.S. Peters, K.D. Timmerhaus, R.E. West, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers (McGraw Hill, New York, 2003)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Puerto Rico Seismic Network (2009) Informe Especial, Explosión de Caribbean Petroleum en Bayamón, PR, 23 de octubre de 2009. University of Puerto Rico Mayagüez CampusGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    E. Salzano, V. Cozzani, The analysis of domino accidents triggered by vapor cloud explosions. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 90(23), 271–284 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    J.A. Tompkins, J.A. White, Y.A. Bozer, E.H. Frazelle, J.M.A. Tanchoco, J. Treviño, Facility Planning (Wiley, New York, 1996)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Risks of fire and explosion associated with the increasing use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 10(4), 322–333 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Development of a new chemical process-industry accident database to assist in past accident analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24, 426–431 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    S.M. Tauseef, D. Rashtchian, S.A. Abbasi, A method for simulation of vapour cloud explosions based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD). J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24, 638–647 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    S. Vasanth, S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, S.A. Abbasi, Assessment of four turbulence models in simulation of large-scale pool fires in the presence of wind using computational fluid dynamics. J. Less Prev. Process Ind. 26, 1071–1084 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    R. Vazquez-Roman, J.H. Lee, S. Jung, M.S. Mannan, Optimal facility layout under toxic release in process facilities: a stochastic approach. Comput. Chem. Eng. 34(1), 122–133 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Basheer
    • 1
  • S. M. Tauseef
    • 2
  • Tasneem Abbasi
    • 1
  • S. A. Abbasi
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Pollution Control and Environmental EngineeringPondicherry UniversityChinakalapet, PuducherryIndia
  2. 2.Environmental Research InstituteUniversity of Petroleum and Energy StudiesDehradunIndia

Personalised recommendations