Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 262–274 | Cite as

Characterization and Failure Analysis of an Automotive Ball Joint

  • M. N. Burcham
  • R. EscobarJr.
  • C. O. Yenusah
  • T. W. Stone
  • G. N. Berry
  • A. L. Schemmel
  • B. M. Watson
  • C. U. Verzwyvelt
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed

Abstract

This case study describes the failure analysis of an automotive lower ball joint that fractured under normal driving conditions. Through spectroscopy, the material was determined to be SAE-AISI 5135H steel. The metallographic examination revealed a tempered martensitic structure, and hardness measurements radially across the surface of the cut ball stud suggested that the stud was through hardened. Scanning electron microscopy of the fracture surfaces indicated fatigue as the main failure mechanism. Finite element analysis was used to analyze the performance of the part under a normal loading condition. A detailed fatigue analysis to determine the effect of various loads on the life of the ball joint was completed using three methods: S-N curve approximation using hardness values, S-N approach using Basquin’s equation, and a linear elastic crack-growth model. The cause of failure was determined to be from surface cracks forming in the high stress concentration neck region where the ball and stud are joined. The presence of a small surface flaw in this region was shown to significantly reduce the fatigue life of the ball joint.

Keywords

Failure analysis Ball joint 5135H steel Fatigue Beach marks 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank both the Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems (CAVS) and Institute for Imaging and Analytical Technologies (I2AT) at Mississippi State University for allowing the use of equipment to perform tests. We would also like to thank Olalekan Junaid for assistance in testing.

References

  1. 1.
    R.N. Jazar, Steering Dynamics, in Vehicle Dynamics: Theory and Application, 1st edn. (Springer, 2008) pp. 379–454Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.E. Holmes, R.D. Stone, Tyre forces as functions of cornering and braking slip on wet road surfaces, in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 183 (1968), pp. 35–55Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Chetan, P. Khushbu, M. Nauman, The fatigue analysis of a vehicle suspension system—a review article. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Res. 2(6), 386–390 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N.J. Durisek, K.J. Granat, E.W. Holmes, Analysis of Front Suspension Ball Joint Separations in Motor Vehicle Crashes, SAE Technical Paper (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B.S. Sin, K.H. Lee, Process design of a ball joint, considering caulking and pull-out strength. Sci. World J. 14, 1–10 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B.H. Jang, K.H. Lee, Analysis and design of a ball joint, considering manufacturing process. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C 228(1), 146–151 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Uguz, S.H. Oka, Modeling the effects of mechanical loads: finite element modeling of ball joints under dynamic loading. Mater. Test. 46(10), 506–512 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Aardema, Failure Analysis of the Lower Rear Ball Joint on the High-Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV) (U.S. Army Tank-Automotive Command, Warren, 1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E.A. Ossa, C.C. Palacio, M.A. Paniagua, Failure analysis of a car suspension system ball joint. Eng. Fail. Anal. 18(5), 1388–1394 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    “Photo by A. Rivan” Photobucket. Web. 07 Dec 2016. http://s253.photobucket.com/user/TheJGB3/media/PreludeSuspension.jpg.html
  11. 11.
    ASTM E407-07(2015)e1, Standard Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    SOLIDWORKS (version Student Edition 2014–2015), Dassault Systems (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    “AISI 5135H Steel” MatWeb Material Property Database. Web. 17 Dec 2016. http://www.matweb.com
  14. 14.
    H. Chandler,  Heat Treater’s Guide: Practices and Procedures for Irons and Steels, 2nd edn. (ASM International, Materials Park, 1995), p. 405Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASTM E140-12be1 Standard Hardness Conversion Tables for Metals Relationship Among Brinell Hardness, Vickers Hardness, Rockwell Hardness, Superficial Hardness, Knoop Hardness, Scleroscope Hardness, and Leeb Hardness (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2012). doi: 10.1520/E0140
  16. 16.
    E.J. Pavlina, C.J. Tyne, Correlation of yield strength and tensile strength with hardness for steels. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 17(6), 888–893 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s11665-008-9225-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G.F. Vander Voort, Visual examination and light microscopy, in American Society for Metals Handbook, 9th ed., vol. 12. Fractography (1987), pp. 91–165Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    C.R. Brooks, A. Choudhury, Fracture Modes and Macrofractographic Features, Failure Analysis of Engineering Materials (2002), pp. 250–279Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.E. Peterson, Design factors for stress concentration. Mach. Des. 23(2), February 1951, p. 169; no. 3, March 1951, p 161, no. 5, May 1951, p 159; no. 6, June 1951, p 173; no. 7, July 1951, p 155Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Neuber, Kerbspannungstehre (Springer, Berlin, 1958); Translation Theory of Notch Stresses, U.S. Office of Technical Services (Washington, 1961)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C.S. Bandara, S.C. Siriwardane, U.I. Dissanayake, R. Dissanayake, Developing a full range S-N curve and estimating cumulative fatigue damage of steel elements. Comput. Mater. Sci. 96, 96–101 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C.S. Bandara, S.C. Siriwardane, U.I. Dissanayake, R. Dissanayake, Full range S-N curves for fatigue life evaluation of steels using hardness measurements. Int. J. Fatigue 82, 325–331 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Alsaran, M. Karakan, A. Çelik, The investigation of mechanical properties of ion-nitrided AISI 5140 low-alloy steel. Mater. Charact. 48, 323–327 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O.H. Basquin, The exponential law of endurance tests, in Proceedings of the ASTM, vol. 10, Part 11 (ASTM, West Conshohocken, 1910), p. 625Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    P.C. Paris, F. Erdogan, A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. J. Basic Eng. Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. 85(2), 528–534 (1963)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    ASM International Handbook Committee, ASM Handbook, vol. 19 (ASM International, 1996)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    J.M. Barsom, S.T. Rolfe, Fatigue and Fracture Control in Structures, 2nd edn. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1987), pp. 288–291Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. N. Burcham
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. EscobarJr.
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. O. Yenusah
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. W. Stone
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. N. Berry
    • 1
  • A. L. Schemmel
    • 1
    • 3
  • B. M. Watson
    • 1
  • C. U. Verzwyvelt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA
  2. 2.Center for Advanced Vehicular SystemsMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Clean Energy TechnologyMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA

Personalised recommendations