Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 189–194 | Cite as

Failure of a Trunnion Axle on a Hard Suspension Multi-axle Trailer

  • Joseph A. Lemberg
  • Brett D. Ellis
  • Eric P. Guyer
Case History---Peer-Reviewed

Abstract

The failure analysis of a trunnion axle on a hard suspension multi-axle trailer is presented. All reported failures have occurred in an unloaded state very shortly after being put into service at or near the top of the trunnion axle in close proximity to a welded round plate. Analyses indicated a pre-existing flaw in the heat-affected zone near the weld. The unloaded state of the trailer, which may have exacerbated the dynamic loading, coupled with the limited damping provided by the hard suspension was likely the driving force for this failure.

Keywords

Brittle fracture Failure analysis Heat-affected zone Steel 

References

  1. 1.
    ASTM E3-11, Standard Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASTM A519-06(2012), Standard Specification for Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Mechanical Tubing (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASTM E384-11ε1, Standard Test Method for Knoop and Vickers Hardness of Materials (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASTM E112-13, Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ASTM E562-11, Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. MacKenzie, Overview of the mechanisms of failure in heat treated steel components, in Failure Analysis of Heat Treated Steel Components, ed. by L.C.F. Canale, R.A. Mesquita, G.E. Totten (ASM International, Geauga County, 2008), pp. 43–86Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K.F. Graff, Wave Motion in Elastic Solids (Dover Publications, New york, 1975), p. 81Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.R. Davis (ed.), ASM Metals Handbook Desk Edition, 2nd edn. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 2003), pp. 274–300Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Kuhn, D. Medlin (eds.), ASM Handbook Volume 8: Mechanical Testing and Evaluation (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 2000), pp. 563–575Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F.B. Pickering, The Effect of Composition and Microstructure on Ductility and Toughness, Towards Improved Ductility and Toughness, 1971 (Kyoto, Japan), Climax Molybdenum Development Company (Japan), Ltd., pp. 9–31Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ASTM E1019-11, Standard Test Methods for Determination of Carbon, Sulfur, Nitrogen, and Oxygen in Steel, Iron, Nickel, and Cobalt Alloys by Various Combustion and Fusion Techniques (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E.M.S. Frame, Determination of trace impurities in materials, in Impurities in Engineering Materials: Impact, Reliability, and Control, ed. by C.L. Briant (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999), pp. 91–142Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Bhanage, N. Satonkar, P. Desmukh, R. Sundge, Evaluation of crashworthiness for SAE materials under ductile to brittle transition temperature (DBTT). Int. J. Eng. Technol. IJET 6(5), 2129–2135 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T.J. Foecke, Metallurgy of the RMS Titanic, NIST Interagency/Internal Report NISTIR-6118 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.A. Wasynczuk, R.O. Ritchie, G. Thomas, Effects of microstructure on fatigue crack growth in duplex ferrite-martensite steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. 62, 79–92 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K.S. Ravichandran, A.K. Vasudevan, Fracture Resistance of Structural Alloys, ASM Handbook Volume 19: Fatigue and Fracture (ASM International, Geauga County, 1996), pp. 381–392Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph A. Lemberg
    • 1
  • Brett D. Ellis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eric P. Guyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Exponent, Inc.AtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering TechnologyUniversity of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations