Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 1059–1066 | Cite as

Rapid Assessment Testing of Polymer Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors in Elevated Temperature–Humidity Environments

  • Anshul Shrivastava
  • Michael H. Azarian
  • Michael Pecht
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed


Aluminum electrolytic capacitors with polymer electrolytes were developed to obtain lower equivalent series resistance (ESR) than that is achievable with liquid electrolytes. Replacement of the liquid electrolyte with a solid conductive polymer also overcomes the propensity of the liquid to evaporate over time, which leads to a reduction in capacitance and an increase in ESR values. However, capacitor manufacturers acknowledge that humidity can degrade the polymer, thereby having an adverse effect on the reliability of polymer aluminum (PA) capacitors. In the current study, surface mount and thru-hole PA capacitors from two different manufacturers were subjected to highly accelerated stress testing (110 °C, 85% RH) and elevated temperature–humidity (85 °C, 85% RH) conditions for rapid assessment. The polymer electrolyte in the capacitors was poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Failure analysis was performed to determine the observed failure modes and the underlying failure mechanisms. The dominant failure modes observed were an increase in leakage current and an increase in ESR.


Polymer aluminum electrolytic capacitors Temperature-humidity test PEDOT Rapid assessment testing HAST Polymer capacitor screening 


  1. 1.
    A. Zanobini, G. Iuculano, A. Falciani, Automatic-test equipment for the characterization of aluminum electrolytic capacitors. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 55(2), 682–688 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Kőmives, S. Gál, K. Tomor, Gy. Kovács, Thermogravimetric studies on aluminium foils for electrolytic capacitors. J. Therm. Anal. 27, 315–324 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Bruder, M. Intelmann, A. Ishikawa, U. Merker, A. Sautter, T. Suzuki, K. Wussow, Conductive Polymer Dispersions for Aluminum Capacitors, CARTS Europe, Munich, 10–11 November 2010Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Morimoto, Y. Hamatani, M. Yoshitake and H. Yamada, US Patent 4831499, 1979Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Shrivastava, S. Bangerth, M.H. Azarian, C. Morillo, M. Pecht, M. Levin, L. Steinhardt, A. Callini, Detection of capacitor electrolyte residues with FTIR in failure analysis. J. Mater. Sci. 25(2), 635–644 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Shrivastava, M.H. Azarian, C. Morillo, B. Sood, M. Pecht, Detection and reliability risks of counterfeit electrolytic capacitors. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 63(2), 468–479 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Liu, M. Sampson, Physical and Electrical Characterization of Aluminum Polymer Capacitors, CARTS Proceedings, New Orleans, LA, 24–26 March 2010, pp. 209–229Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.D. Rawlings, New Family of Conductive Polymers For Solid Electrolyte Aluminum Capacitors, CARTS Asia, Taipei, 9–13 October 2006Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Yamamoto, M. Oshima, M. Fukuda, I. Isa, K. Yoshino, Characteristics of aluminium solid electrolytic capacitors using a conducting polymer. J. Power Source. 60(2), 173–177 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Kudoh, A. Akami, Y. Matsuya, Solid electrolytic capacitor with highly stable conducting polymer as a counter electrode. Synth. Met. 102(1–3), 973–974 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Elschner, S. Kirchmeyer, W. Lövenich, U. Merker, K. Reuter, in PEDOT: Principles and Applications of an Intrinsically Conductive Polymer (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2010), Print ISBN: 978-1-4200-6911-2, eBook ISBN: 978-1-4200-6912-9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Garreau, G. Louarn, S. Lefrant, J.P. Buisson, G. Froyer, Optical study and vibrational analysis of the poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT). Synth. Met. 101(1–3), 312–313 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Nogami, K. Sakamoto, T. Hayakawa, M. Kakimoto, The effects of hyperbranched poly(siloxysilane)s on conductive polymer aluminum solid electrolytic capacitors. J. Power Source. 166, 584–589 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Peter, M.H. Azarian, M. Pecht, in Reliability of Manganese Dioxide and Conductive Polymer Tantalum Capacitors under Temperature Humidity Bias Testing, International Symposium on Microelectronics, vol. 2015, No. 1 (2015), pp. 000713–000719Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CALCE, Center for Advanced Life Cycle EngineeringUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations