Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 730–737 | Cite as

Analysis on the Fire Accident of Hydrocracking Unit

  • Ju Liu
  • Qiankun Zheng
  • Jianyou Feng
  • Ziwei Pan
  • Sixian Rao
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed


A fire accident occurred in an oil refinery in north China. The on-site investigations proved that the fire was triggered by the leakage of tail oil from one hole on the pipeline. The detailed analysis of the metallurgical microstructure of related pipelines indicated that some micro-cracks existed in the pipeline. Under the action of tensile stress induced by inner pressure, one of the micro-cracks kept propagating and evolved into macro-crack; under the action of cyclic circumferential tensile stress and stress concentration in the crack tip, the macro-crack was transformed to penetrated crack, finally the crack was torn open by inner pressure, and then the leakage hole on the pipeline was formed and fire accident occurred.


Failure analysis Fire damage Fatigue cracking Fracture mechanism Low cycle fatigue 


  1. 1.
    J.W. Cheng, Y. Luo, F.B. Zhou, Explosibility safety factor: an approach to assess mine gas explosion risk. J. Fire Technol. 51(2), 309–323 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Planas, E. Pastor, J. Casal, J.M. Bonilla, Analysis of the boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion (BLEVE) of a liquefied natural gas road tanker: the Zarzalico accident. J Loss Prev. Process Ind. 34, 127–138 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Planas-Cuchi, N. Gasulla, A. Ventosa, J. Casal, Explosion of a road tanker containing liquified natural gas. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 17(4), 315–321 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yi Zhu, Xin-ming Qian, Zhen-yi Liu, Ping Huang, Meng-qi Yuan, Analysis and assessment of the Qingdao crude oil vapor explosion accident: lessons learnt. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 33, 289–303 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Liu, W. He, J. Guo, Q. Huang, Risk propagation mechanism: Qingdao Crude Oil Leaking and Explosion case study. J. Eng. Fail. Anal. 56, 555–561 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G.B.G. Ni-na, Consequence analysis of fire and explosion accident of the catalytic cracking unit. J Ind. Saf. Environ. Prot. 34(02), 32–34 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Shi, J. Shuai, K. Xu, Fuzzy fault tree assessment based on improved AHP for fire and explosion accidents for steel oilstorage tanks. J. Hazard. Mater. 278, 529–538 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yeongjin Chung, Case analysis of oil fire accidents. J. Korean Rev. Crisis Emerg. Manag. 10(2), 133–155 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Guo, M.J. Peng, J.F. Ruan, Wan W Cause analysis of the fire and explosion during crude oil desulfurization in China. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26, 961–967 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Landucci, A. Tugnoli, V. Busini, M. Derudi, R. Rota, V. Cozzani, The Viareggio LPG accident: lessons learnt. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24(4), 466–476 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Vianello, G. Maschio, Risk analysis of natural gas pipeline: case study of a generic pipeline. J. Chem. Eng. Trans. 24(24), 1309–1314 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P.L. Metropolo, A.E.P. Brown, Natural gas pipeline accident consequence analysis. J. Process Saf. Prog. 23(23), 307–310 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ju Liu
    • 1
  • Qiankun Zheng
    • 1
  • Jianyou Feng
    • 1
  • Ziwei Pan
    • 1
  • Sixian Rao
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringAnhui University of TechnologyMaanshanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations