Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 629–634 | Cite as

Characterization of Damage Induced by Impacting Objects in Udimet-500 Alloy

  • H. K. Farahani
  • M. Ketabchi
  • Sh. Zangeneh
  • M. Hosseini
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed

Abstract

Foreign object damage (FOD) is one of the common mechanisms in turbine blade failures which reduces high cycle fatigue life and contributes significantly to premature failure. Therefore, this study experimentally simulated FOD on the first stage blade of a gas turbine. Foreign objects with two parameters of object nose shape (spherical, conical, and flat) and impact angle (90° and 45° relative to the blade surface) were impacted on the surface of flat specimens of Udimet-500 at a temperature of 733°C with velocity of 300 m/s (same as working condition of blades). In order to evaluate the impact site morphologies, induced craters were first studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Then samples were sectioned symmetrically, and by using image analysis tool software, the depth of each crater was measured. Finally, based on the results, it was found that maximum and minimum stress concentration factors and induced microcracks, respectively, are regarding to flat projectiles with impact angel of 45° and spherical at impact angle of 90°.

Keywords

Object nose shape Foreign object damage Impact angle Udimet-500 

References

  1. 1.
    X. Chen, Foreign object damage on the leading edge of a thin blade. Mech. Mater. 37(4), 447–457 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Zabeen, M. Preuss, P.J. Withers, Residual stresses caused by head-on and 45° foreign object damage for a laser shock peened Ti–6Al–4V alloy aerofoil. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 560, 518–527 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.O. Peters, R.O. Ritchie, Influence of foreign-object damage on crack initiation and early crack growth during high-cycle fatigue of Ti–6Al–4V. Eng. Fract. Mech. 67(3), 193–207 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    X. Chen et al., Foreign object damage in a thermal barrier system: mechanisms and simulations. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 352(1–2), 221–231 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.W. Crowell et al., Experiments and numerical simulations of single particle foreign object damage-like impacts of thermal barrier coatings. Int. J. Impact Eng 48, 116–124 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.M. Marandi, K. Rahmani, M. Tajdari, Foreign object damage on the leading edge of gas turbine blades. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 33(1), 65–75 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Duó et al., Evaluation and analysis of residual stresses due to foreign object damage. Mech. Mater. 39(3), 199–211 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.M. Martinez et al., Effects of ballistic impact damage on fatigue crack initiation in Ti–6Al–4V simulated engine blades. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 325(1–2), 465–477 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Spanrad, J. Tong, Characterization of foreign object damage (FOD) and early fatigue crack growth in laser shock peened Ti–6AL–4V aerofoil specimens. Procedia Eng. 2(1), 1751–1759 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.R. Bache, C. Bradshaw, W. Voice, Characterisation of foreign object damage and fatigue strength in titanium based aerofoil alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 354(1–2), 199–206 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.J. Ruschau, T. Nicholas, S.R. Thompson, Influence of foreign object damage (FOD) on the fatigue life of simulated Ti–6Al–4V airfoils. Int. J. Impact Eng 25(3), 233–250 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Lin et al., Residual stresses due to foreign object damage in laser-shock peened aerofoils: simulation and measurement. Mech. Mater. 82, 78–90 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Hall et al., Influence of foreign object damage on fatigue crack growth of gas turbine aerofoils under complex loading conditions. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 31(5), 386–397 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Lin et al., Fatigue crack growth in laser-shock-peened Ti–6Al–4V aerofoil specimens due to foreign object damage. Int. J. Fatigue 59, 23–33 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B.L. Boyce et al., The residual stress state due to a spherical hard-body impact. Mech. Mater. 33(8), 441–454 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B.L. Boyce et al., Mechanical relaxation of localized residual stresses associated with foreign object damage. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 349(1–2), 48–58 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Nowell, P. Duó, I.F. Stewart, Prediction of fatigue performance in gas turbine blades after foreign object damage. Int. J. Fatigue 25(9–11), 963–969 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P.G. Frankel et al., Residual stress fields after FOD impact on flat and aerofoil-shaped leading edges. Mech. Mater. 55, 130–145 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fiat, TTG, TG20 Gas turbine training manualGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fiat, TTG, TG20-Row 1 and 2 rotating blade, Udimet 500 (1985)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Viswanathan, Damage Mechanisms and Life Assessment of High Temperature Components (ASM International, 1989)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. K. Farahani
    • 1
  • M. Ketabchi
    • 1
  • Sh. Zangeneh
    • 2
  • M. Hosseini
    • 3
  1. 1.Mining and Metallurgical Engineering DepartmentAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringRazi UniversityKermanshahIran
  3. 3.Poolad Peech Kar Applied Science DepartmentPakdashtIran

Personalised recommendations