Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Failure Analysis and Mechanical Characterization of 3D Printed ABS With Respect to Layer Thickness and Orientation

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In contrast to conventional subtractive manufacturing methods which involve removing material to reach the desired shape, additive manufacturing is the technology of making objects directly from a computer-aided design model by adding a layer of material at a time. In this study, a comprehensive effort was undertaken to represent the strength of a 3D printed object as a function of layer thickness by investigating the correlation between the mechanical properties of parts manufactured out of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) using fused deposition modeling and layer thickness and orientation. Furthermore, a case study on a typical support frame is done to generalize the findings of the extensive experimental work done on tensile samples. Finally, fractography was performed on tensile samples via a scanning digital microscope to determine the effects of layer thickness on failure modes. Statistical analyses proved that layer thickness and raster orientation have significant effect on the mechanical properties. Tensile test results showed that samples printed with 0.2 mm layer thickness exhibit higher elastic modulus and ultimate strength compared with 0.4 mm layer thickness. These results have direct influence on decision making and future use of 3D printing and functional load bearing parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASTM International, Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies (Withdrawn 2015)—ASTM F2792-12a (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Letcher, B. Rankouhi and S. Javadpour, Experimental study of mechanical properties of additively manufactured ABS plastic as a function of layer parameters, ASME 2015 Int. Mech. Eng. Cong. and Exp., 2015, p. V02AT02A018-V02AT02A018.

  3. “Wohler’s Report, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry, Annual Worldwide Progress Report”, 2014, Wohler’s Associates, 2015, p. 20.

  4. B.M. Tymrak, M. Kreiger, J.M. Pearce, Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater. Des. 58, 242–246 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A.R. Torrado, D.A. Roberson, Failure analysis and anisotropy evaluation of 3D-printed tensile test specimens of different geometries and print raster patterns. J Fail. Anal. Preven. 16(1), 154–164 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Croccolo, M. De Agostinis, G. Olmi, Experimental characterization and analytical modelling of the mechanical behaviour of fused deposition processed parts made of ABS-M30. Comp. Mat. Sci. 79, 506–518 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Bellini, S. Güçeri, Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp. J. 9(4), 252–264 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Ahn, M. Montero, D. Odell, S. Roundy, P.K. Wright, Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyp. J. 8(4), 248–257 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J.F. Rodríguez, J.P. Thomas, J.E. Renaud, Design of fused-deposition ABS components for stiffness and strength. J. Mech. Des. 125(3), 545–551 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Ulu, E. Korkmaz, K. Yay, O.B. Ozdoganlar, L.B. Kara, Enhancing the structural performance of additively manufactured objects through build orientation optimization. J. Mech. Des. 137(11), 111410-111410-9 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B.H. Lee, J. Abdullah, Z.A. Khan, Optimization of rapid prototyping parameters for production of flexible ABS object. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 169(1), 54–61 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A.K. Sood, R.K. Ohdar, S.S. Mahapatra, Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater. Des. 31(1), 287–295 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Anitha, S. Arunachalam, P. Radhakrishnan, Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. J. of Mater. Process. Technol. 118(1–3), 385–388 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Vaezi, C.K. Chua, Effects of layer thickness and binder saturation level parameters on 3D printing process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 53(1), 275–284 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. R. Ma, L. U. Odhner, and A. M. Dollar, A modular, open-source 3d printed underactuated hand, Robot. Auto. (ICRA), IEEE Int. Conf., 2013, p. 2737-2743.

  16. J. Won, K. DeLaurentis, C. Mavroidis, Rapid prototyping of robotic systems. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Auto. 4, 3077–3082 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. J. De Laurentis, F. F. Kong, and C. Mavroidis, Procedure for rapid fabrication of non-assembly mechanisms with embedded components, ASME Int. Des. Eng. Tech. Conf. Comp. Info. Eng. Conf., 2002, p.1239-1245.

  18. J.T. Belter, A.M. Dollar, Strengthening of 3D printed fused deposition manufactured parts using the fill compositing technique. PLoS ONE 10(4), e0122915 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Jin, J. Plott, R. Chen, J. Wensman, A. Shih, Additive manufacturing of custom orthoses and prostheses–A review. Procedia CIRP 36, 199–204 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Telfer, J. Pallari, J. Munguia, K. Dalgarno, M. McGeough, J. Woodburn, Embracing additive manufacture: implications for foot and ankle orthosis design. BMC Musc. Dis. 13(1), 1–9 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. “Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics”, ASTM D638-14, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014.

  22. “Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials”, ASTM D3039/D3039M – 14, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014.

  23. L. Li, Q. Sun, C. Bellehumeur, P. Gu, Composite modeling and analysis for fabrication of FDM prototypes with locally controlled properties. J. Manuf. Proc. 4(2), 129–141 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A.R. Torrado Perez, D.A. Roberson, and R.B. Wicker, Fracture surface analysis of 3D-printed tensile specimens of novel ABS-based materials, J. Fail. Anal. Preven., 14(3), 2014, p. 343-353.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Joseph Robertson for his consultation on statistical analyses. The experiments presented in this study were performed in Material Evaluation and Testing Laboratory (METLAB) in the mechanical engineering department at South Dakota State University (SDSU). Financial support for this paper was provided by Advanced Manufacturing Process Technology Transition & Training Center (AMPTEC) under Contract Number 3S6674.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical Engineering, South Dakota State University, Dept PO Box 2219, Brookings, SD, 57007-2201, USA

    Behzad Rankouhi, Sina Javadpour, Fereidoon Delfanian & Todd Letcher

Authors
  1. Behzad Rankouhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sina Javadpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fereidoon Delfanian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Todd Letcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd Letcher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rankouhi, B., Javadpour, S., Delfanian, F. et al. Failure Analysis and Mechanical Characterization of 3D Printed ABS With Respect to Layer Thickness and Orientation. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 16, 467–481 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-016-0113-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-016-0113-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation