Skip to main content
Log in

Safety and Risk Analysis of an Operational Heater Using Bayesian Network

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrials systems, including chemical industries, can be exposed to undesired events that may cause terrible accidents. These accidents must be controlled and reduced. To this end, numerous risk analysis management approaches have been aimed at reducing the risks to a tolerable level to avoid the catastrophic accident. This reduction is achieved by implementing several layers of protection, including organizational and technical barriers, this later known as safety-instrumented systems (SIS). The main objective assigned to a SIS is the detection of dangerous situations and implementation of a set of reactions necessary at a specific time to ensure that the equipment is under control. This function is typically name the safety-instrumented function and is characterized by a safety integrity level (SIL). A SIL is defined as a measure of the confidence to perform the safety function. This paper deals with the uncertainties of SIS using one of several robust probabilistic methods from a group of Bayesian networks (BN). A case study of an operational heater is used to illustrate the application. The results are then compared with the risk tolerance criteria and the safety of the improved process by updating the BN model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Possibility theory, first proposed by Professor Lotfi Zadeh in 1978, is a mathematical theory for dealing with certain types of uncertainty and is an alternative to probability theory.

References

  1. International Electrotechnical Commission (2003) IEC 61511: functional safety—safety instrumented systems for the process industry. Part1: framework, definitions, system, hardware and software requirements

  2. International Electrotechnical Commission (2010) IEC 61508: functional safety of electrical/ electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems. Part1: General requirements. Edition 2.0, April 2010

  3. Y. Liu, M. A. Lundteigen, Reliability Importance of the Channels in Safety Instrumented Systems, in 2nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Applications (ICIMSA2015), Tokyo, Japan, 2015

  4. Y. Dutuit, F. Innal, A. Rauzy, J.-P. Signoret, Probabilistic assessments in relationship with safety integrity levels by using Fault Trees. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93(12), 1867–1876 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P.R. Kannan, Bayesian networks: application in safety instrumentation and risk reduction. ISA Trans. 46(2), 255–259 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Ouazraouia, R. Nait-Saida, M. Bourarechea, I. Sellami, Layers of protection analysis in the framework of possibility theory. J. Hazard. Mater. 262, 168–178 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference (Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Philippe, L. Jouffe, Complex system reliability modelling with Dynamic Object Oriented Bayesian Networks (DOOBN). Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91(2), 149–162 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Hanea, B. Ale, Risk of human fatality in building fires: A decision tool using Bayesian networks. Fire Saf. J. 44(5), 704–710 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Bobbioa, L. Portinalea, M. Minichinob, E. Ciancamerlab, Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71(3), 249–260 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. F.V. Jensen, T.D. Nielsen, Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, 2nd edn. (Springer, New York, 2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. O. Doguc, J.E. Ramirez-Marquez, A generic method for estimating system reliability using Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(2), 542–550 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. IEC61882. Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP studies)—Application Guide, International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), 2001

  14. AgenaRisk software, version 6.1 (2015). <www.agenarisk.com>

  15. Methodology for Layer of Protection Analysis, SONATRACH Company, Hassi-R’Mel, Rep. S-30-1240-140, 2007

  16. OREDA, Offshore Reliability Data Handbook, 4th edn. (OREDA, Norway, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. CCPS, Layer Of Protection Analysis, Simplified Process Assessment (Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute for Chemical Engineers, New York, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their comments that have allowed the improvement of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamza Zerrouki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zerrouki, H., Tamrabet, A. Safety and Risk Analysis of an Operational Heater Using Bayesian Network. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 15, 657–661 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-015-9986-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-015-9986-8

Keywords

Navigation