Skip to main content
Log in

Full Length Symmetric Versus Partial Length Un-symmetric Pin Loading Failure and Analysis for Clevis Attachments

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, testing failure of the clevis–pin attachments for full length symmetric versus partial length un-symmetric configuration is considered. Theoretically and analytically it can be shown that due to higher stress levels in the partial length un-symmetric pin clevis configuration failure occurs sooner than in a full length symmetric pin clevis configuration. However, here by placement of the two different configurations at opposite ends of one axial tensile test setup the theory was put in test. The test results also indicated that the partial length clevis–pin attachment fails sooner than the full length clevis–pin attachment. Experimental procedures are described here in this paper. Both theoretical and finite element analyses are performed to validate the failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Pechatsko, J. Stambolia, E.B. Shields, J.B. Davenport, A.D. Orning, Stress analysis of a pin and clevis assembly, in ASME 2003 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference (ASME, New York, 2003)

  2. W.C. Young, Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Javidinejad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Javidinejad, A. Full Length Symmetric Versus Partial Length Un-symmetric Pin Loading Failure and Analysis for Clevis Attachments. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 16, 67–74 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-015-0046-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-015-0046-1

Keywords

Navigation