Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 129–138 | Cite as

Development of an Efficient Prognostic Estimator

Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed

Abstract

In this paper, the development of a new prognostic estimation technique for on-line gear health management system is described and demonstrated with real spiral bevel gear run-to-failure test data. Unlike conventional particle filter-based prognostic estimation methods, the prognostic technique presented in this paper is a hybrid of the unscented Kalman filter and particle filter. It is designed to improve the processing efficiency whilst the state estimation accuracy is maintained. The unscented Kalman filter is utilized to obtain the “best estimate” of the states of a degrading nonlinear component and the particle filter l-step ahead prediction technique is employed to obtain the remaining useful life of the component. In addition, data mining techniques are applied to efficiently define the system dynamics model, observation model, and predicted measurement information for the prognostic estimator. At last, the feasibility of the presented prognostic estimator is demonstrated with satisfactory results using the actual oil debris mass and health index data obtained from a spiral bevel gear test rig.

Keywords

Bevel gear CBM Condition-based management Health management Particle filter Prognostic estimator Prognostics Unscented Kalman filter Data mining 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and data provided by Dr. Paula Dempsey that have made this paper possible.

References

  1. 1.
    A.K.A. Jardine, D. Lin, D. Banjevic, A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 20, 1483–1510 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Ristic, S. Arulampalam, N.L. Gordon, Beyond the Kalman Filter (Artech House Publishers, Boston, 2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Doucet, A.M. Johansen, A Tutorial on Particle Filtering and Smoothing: Fifteen Years Later (Oxford Handbook of Nonlinear Filtering, Oxford, 2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.E. Orchard, G.J. Vachtsevanos, A particle-filtering approach for on-line fault diagnosis and failure prognosis. Trans. Inst. Meas. Control 31(3/4), 221–246 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Butler, J. Ringwood, Particle filters for remaining useful life estimation of abatement equipment used in semiconductor manufacturing, in Proceedings of the First Conference on Control and Fault–Tolerant Systems (Nice, France), October 6–8, 2010Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Saha, K. Goebel, S. Poll, J. Christophersen, Prognostics Methods for Battery Health Monitoring Using a Bayesian Framework. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 58(2), 291–296 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Zio, G. Peloni, Particle filtering prognostic estimation of the remaining useful life of nonlinear components. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 96, 403–409 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Daigle, A. Saxena, K. Goebel, An efficient deterministic approach to model-based prediction, in Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society , Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2012Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. He, E. Bechhoefer, J. Ma, J. Zhu, A particle filtering based approach for gear prognostics, in Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems: Methods and Techniques, Chap. 13, 2012Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Zhu, J. Yoon, D. He, B. Qiu, E. Bechhoefer, Online condition monitoring and remaining useful life prediction of particle contaminated lubrication oil, in IEEE PHM conference, Washington, DC, 2013Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Zhu, J. Yoon, B. Qiu, D. He, Lubrication oil condition monitoring and remaining useful life prediction with particle filtering. Int. J. PHM 4(020), 1–15 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Zhu, D. He, J. Yoon, E. Bechhoefer, Online particle contaminated lubrication oil condition monitoring and remaining useful life prediction for wind turbines. Wind Energy. (2014). doi: 10.1002/we.1746 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.F. Handschuh, Thermal Behavior of Spiral Bevel Gears, NASA/TM-106518, 1995Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.F. Handschuh, Testing of Face-Milled Spiral Bevel Gears at High-Speed and Load, NASA/TM-2001-210743, 2001Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ANSI/AGMA, Appearance of Gear Teeth—Terminology of Wear and Failure, ANSI/AGMA 1010-E95Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Bechhoefer, D. He, P. Dempsey, Gear health threshold setting based on a probability of false alarm, in Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, Quebec, Canada, 2011Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P.J. Dempsey, R.F. Handschuh, A.A. Afjeh, Spiral bevel gear damage detection using decision fusion analysis, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion, Annapolis, MD, 2002Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R.V.D. Merwe, A. Doucet, N.D. Freitas, E. Wan, The unscented particle filter, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2000, pp. 584–590Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S.J. Julier, J.K. Uhlmann, A new extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems, in Proceedings of the SPIE 3068, Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition, July 28, 1997, Orlando, FL. doi: 10.1117/12.280797
  20. 20.
    S.J. Julier, J.K. Uhlmann, H.F. Durrant-Whyte, A new approach for filtering nonlinear systems, in Proceedings of the 1995 American Control Conference, vol. 3, Jun 21–23, 1995 (Seattle, Washington)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S.J. Julier, J.K. Uhlmann, Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proc. IEEE 92(3), 401–422 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Sarkka, Recursive Bayesian inference on stochastic differential equations. Ph.D. Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, 2006Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    N.J. Gordon, D.J. Salmond, A.F.M. Smith, Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation. IEEE Proc. Radar Signal Process. 140(2), 107–113 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M.S. Arulampalam, S. Maskell, N. Gordon, A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 50(2), 174–188 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. He, E. Bechhoefer, P. Dempsey, J. Ma, An integrated approach for gear health prognostics, in The American Helicopter Society 68th Forum, May 1–3, 2002, Fort Worth, TXGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations